<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'measurement'</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=measurement&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'measurement'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>BARB for online video is coming!</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/film38/archive/2009/05/08/barb-for-online-video-is-coming.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:08:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:43987</guid><dc:creator>1363416</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I cheered this morning when I read that the Broadband Measurement Working Group are developing standards for measuring viewing of online video. This is going to be a huge boost for everyone working in the online video industry as advertisers will be able to feel more confident about putting money behind online video campaigns once there is a standard and sophisticated way of measuring it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It could also raise the bar as to the quality of online video campaigns once we have a standard to compare the effectiveness of campaigns against each other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bring it on! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Flash report from the imedia brand summit</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/bloggingforfood/archive/2008/11/14/flash-report-from-the-imedia-brand-summit.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:59:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:31936</guid><dc:creator>1319935</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Intel, the BBC, Dell, Coca-Cola, Samsung and Cadbury’s et al presented experiences of interactive capacity and competency in their companies.&lt;br /&gt;I was asked to moderate a panel of experts from the newspaper industry, the BBC, the online travel world and the global advertiser on the state of the nation of the impact digital technique has in the world of communication. A very high quality panel discussed a range of issues, including how businesses are organising themselves for effectiveness in the digital world, and what some of the challenges have been in getting them there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Peter Ward from WAYN (the travel social network) spoke well about how his business has pushed the limits of technique from the beginning. As with many other social networking sites, WAYN enables its users to create a profile and upload photos. Users can then search for others, and link them to their profiles as friends. If you register it is possible to send and receive messages using email, discussion forums, eCards, SMS and instant messaging. Matt from the BBC spoke about how stakeholder management remains a skillset we need to excel at since the need to get so many interest groups focused on a single strategy around the consumer is as critical in the BBC&amp;#39;s world as it is in the world of brand communication. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Simon Shipley from Intel was firm in his belief that delivering digital work required a commitment to learning new skills. Intel has undertaken a serious programme of training internally to digital knowledge. And the ability to develop communities of interest amongst target audiences has been one area of growing effectiveness. Intel runs a programme aimed at IT Managers, a critical audience (in both meanings of the word) called the IT Manager Game. It’s proving to be more and more effective as time spent and quality of content consumed through the game play increases. It’s a completely ‘non-traditional’ activity, which makes it harder to measure in terms of media metrics, but easy to measure in terms of effectiveness of shifting perception and commitment to the Intel brand.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anne Foster from the Newspaper Marketing Agency reflected on how the demands of advertisers had changed to reflect the audiences, and the mood in the media industry was definitely a focus on sales and ROI rather than brand. Also there were different levels of media need by category. We had talked offline about an increased interest in emotional factors influencing decision making, which, and how we are in danger of too much focus on the short term. It’s inevitable, though, in current forecast market conditions. Anne also presented a strong grip on the statistics of consumer behaviour, how they consume media and what this means.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Measurement remained a big issue for everyone. I put the question to the floor “is anyone happy with their measurement?” and the universal response (although in such an environment it’s natural for people not to give too much away) was “not really.”&amp;nbsp; There are new dynamics of measuring digital media, and dashboarding gives us a view, but there is a shortage of common currency, both in planning and measurement. For example, the current pressure on ROI and direct response means refocusing on click through, but as consumer behaviour online has adapted to the range of content and browsing behaviour, click through just isn’t enough.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So what’s the answer to that? Again, opinions varied, and the room was divided on what we’re trying to measure. My take is that if we accept the job of the marketer is to be gaining or defending ‘share’, or launching new products, services and variants, then we need to have people with the broad view as well as the detailed ability to pick targets off one by one. Share, of course, is only one aspect. Profitability is another, and sustaining profitable share is the job of everyone, not just the marketer. There is universal need to learn, however, how ‘being part of the conversation’ can be measured in these terms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Econometrics for beginners</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2008/01/22/econometrics-for-beginners.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:44:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13761</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/364841/rip-last-click-wins.html"&gt;Matthew Finch has a great article on how to measure the impact of all of your online marketing activities&lt;/a&gt; - a thing surprisingly hard to do:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is it time to say farewell to the old model of assigning all the value to the last click? Many marketers want the ability to measure customers&amp;#39; paths to purchase and understand the influences of each channel on a sale.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=732833" title="subscribe by email"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/email.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by email" width="16" height="16" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; email&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt; or &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/advertising2" title="subscribe by RSS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/feed.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by RSS" width="16" height="16" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; RSS&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Research is the only route to measuring effectiveness</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2008/01/11/research-is-the-only-route-to-measuring-effectiveness.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:51:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13925</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Articles/36388/Research+is+the+only+route+to+measuring+effectiveness.html"&gt;Richard Huntington&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;We need real attempts to prove the commercial value of immersing people in a brand&amp;#39;s world and having them interact with it and share it with others, not to mention the means by which to model the sales effect of digital activity and prove its contribution to the client&amp;#39;s bottom line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=732833" title="subscribe by email"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/email.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by email" width="16" height="16" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; email&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt; or &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/advertising2" title="subscribe by RSS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/feed.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by RSS" width="16" height="16" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; RSS&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>A/B and multivariate testing</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2007/06/04/ab-and-multivariate-testing.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 18:23:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13415</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Catchy headline huh? Well, &lt;a href="http://technologyweekly.mad.co.uk/Main/Home/Articlex/6f452b7cb4db47a8afc00ff9b8fb9752/Quant-is-King.html"&gt;read on&lt;/a&gt; to see how you can get a 70% uplift in response rates...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=732833" title="subscribe by email"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/email.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by email" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; email&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt; or &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/advertising2" title="subscribe by RSS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/feed.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by RSS" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; RSS&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why bother with Web Analytics?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2007/05/14/why-bother-with-web-analytics.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 21:28:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13859</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;For those of you that have forgotten, &lt;a href="http://www.e-consultancy.com/news-blog/363322/why-bother-with-web-analytics.html"&gt;a little refresher&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=732833" title="subscribe by email"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/email.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by email" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; email&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt; or &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/advertising2" title="subscribe by RSS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/feed.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by RSS" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; RSS&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Online reach - are visitor counts half-baked?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2007/05/14/online-reach--are-visitor-counts-halfbaked.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2007 13:44:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13364</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;One for the measurement geeks only - &lt;a href="http://www.adotas.com/2007/05/online-reach-%e2%80%93-are-your-visitor-counts-half-baked/"&gt;Adotas have a good article on what the recent revelation that cookie deletion is causing sites to massively overestimate their numbers of unique visitors actually means&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=732833" title="subscribe by email"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/email.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by email" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; email&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt; or &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/advertising2" title="subscribe by RSS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/feed.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by RSS" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; RSS&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>By what measure?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2007/04/18/by-what-measure.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:41:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13441</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description> &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.netimperative.com/2007/04/16/Nielsen_time_research"&gt;Nielsen//Netratings have done some interesting research looking at the leading UK websites according to different metrics&lt;/a&gt; - by total page views and pages per visitor, by total visits and visits per visitor and by total time and time per visitor - which throws up some really interesting results (both the &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6564671.stm"&gt;BBC&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.rmmlondon.com/archive/its-not-how-much-its-how-long/"&gt;RMM&lt;/a&gt; have good follow-ups on this).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;sup&gt;Subscribe to Advertising 2.0 by&lt;/sup&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=732833" title="subscribe by email"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/email.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by email" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; email&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;sup&gt; or &lt;/sup&gt;&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/advertising2" title="subscribe by RSS"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.neighbourhoodfixit.com/i/feed.png" border="0" alt="subscribe by RSS" /&gt;&lt;sup&gt; RSS&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt; </description></item><item><title>The problem with integration is the concept</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2007/03/02/the-problem-with-integration-is-the-concept.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:49:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:14043</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://garethkay.typepad.com/brand_new/2007/03/incorrect_words.html"&gt;Gareth Kay on integration&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;is integration the right concept?&amp;nbsp; Isn&amp;#39;t it really all about interaction of different elements creating a new idea rather than the integration of the same idea or execution across every channel? (I think &lt;a href="http://lbtoronto.typepad.com/lbto/2006/10/transmedia_plan.html"&gt;Faris&amp;#39; and Jason&amp;#39;s thinking on transmedia planning&lt;/a&gt; supports this)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And this leads me to the ongoing futile debate about measuring &amp;#39;integrated&amp;#39; campaigns. And this, I believe, is what is causing the futility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="http://herd.typepad.com/"&gt;Mark&lt;/a&gt; talks about quite brilliantly in &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Herd-Change-Behaviour-Harnessing-Nature/dp/0470060360"&gt;Herd&lt;/a&gt;, there is a big difference between things that are complicated and things that are complex. As he explains, an airplane is complicated - you can break it down into its parts and then build it up again - whereas mayonnaise is complex - it&amp;#39;s ingredients become something interwoven and quite different through their interaction and cannot be separated to its initial ingredients.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Most (if not all) of our measurement of &amp;#39;integrated&amp;#39; ideas assume they are complicated - we can measure the individual channels and their contribution to the net result (and therefore optimize the mix). But isn&amp;#39;t this wrong? If these ideas are interactive in nature then aren&amp;#39;t we talking about a complex entity, not a complicated one. And, if we are, shouldn&amp;#39;t we just be looking at the overall impact on the brand rather than trying to crack the nut into bits?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item><item><title>Size doesn't matter - it's who views your content</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/advertising_20/archive/2007/01/15/size-doesnt-matter--its-who-views-your-content.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:30:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:13704</guid><dc:creator>878512</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://media.guardian.co.uk/mediaguardian/story/0,,1990190,00.html"&gt;Jeff Jarvis in the Media Guardian&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;/p&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just when we were getting used to it, the page view has been declared dead. There are many reasons for its passing, having to do with how web pages are now made and how web content is now distributed. But there is one seismic implication to this - in media, mass is over. Size doesn&amp;#39;t matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You see, overall circulation mattered only when you and your ads were stuck in the same pages with many other advertisers and you all got the same audience, whether that audience gave a damn about you or not. But now, online, you could find better ways to reach just the people you wanted or who wanted you. Thus, travel advertisers needn&amp;#39;t care about the circulation of Guardian Unlimited, only about who saw their ads on travel pages. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now add to this the widgetisation of the web. Content may be displayed not only on your pages but also in widgets - boxes, gadgets and applications - that are embedded in pages elsewhere. This is how much of MySpace is built and how YouTube spreads video all over the internet. The audience becomes the distributor. How do you count that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And consider Google AdSense modules that are spread all across the web, from NYTimes.com to my humble blog. Shouldn&amp;#39;t each of those be counted as Google page views since Google revenue is attached? Doesn&amp;#39;t that make Google look even more gigantic than it already is? What this really means is that in the new distributed media economy, owning a site doesn&amp;#39;t matter so much as enabling a network.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;But more fundamental than all this is, again, that size doesn&amp;#39;t matter anymore, not in media. Oh, yes, the movie with the biggest box office or the book with the biggest sales still makes the most money - for now at least. But in more and more of the media, mass measurements are obsolete because we are now fragmented into the mass of niches. And the truth is that we, the audience, never cared how many more people were watching what we watched. And advertisers don&amp;#39;t care so much what we&amp;#39;re watching so long as we&amp;#39;re watching them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a world of so many choices, the audience care about trust, taste, relevance, usefulness, not ratings. And advertisers care more about targeting, efficiency, engagement, branding and return on investment. These are better measurements than print circulation or broadcast ratings or online page views. And so now, publishers, advertisers and technologists must catch up and change their yardsticks for success yet again. It is time to measure quality over quantity.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>