Search results matching tag 'lady geek'

Technology: Is it different for girls?

2085942 — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:15:00 GMT

I am frustrated. I am bored. I feel patronised. PC World is telling me My World is Pink (it has not been pink since I was 7) and I need a new laptop to match my outfit (it would never even occur to me to match my outfit with my technology). Samsung is asking me “What Colour is my Life?” (hello?) and Dell is telling me that technology is like candy (do me a favour).

I am a 35 year-old professional woman with my own home. I am educated, fairly tech literate and, most importantly, I have cash to spend. Plenty of cash to spend, on technology that will make my life easier, more creative and fun.

Out of every ten gadgets bought in the UK, four are now bought by women. And, before you ask, we are not talking about fridges and washing machines. No, these are high-end items such as HD TV's, games consoles and smart phones. And there are more games being played by women than men between the ages of 25-34. I am not alone in feeling patronised or alienated by technology and consumer electronic brands.

I recently conducted some research for Forrester. This highlighted that one third of all British women do not feel connected to a single technology brand. Over half of all women walk out of shops because they cannot find what they are looking for. This missed opportunity is calculated at £0.6 billion. The technology industry is where the automotive industry was 20 years ago- nervous boys at the school dance who do not quite know what to do or say to women. They end up leading with two left feet.

So why do technology companies think that pinking up and dumbing down their marketing is the way to get professional, well educated women to part with their cash? Why do they treat young girls and women alike - as an afterthought? Why are companies not researching “what women really want” and getting advice from expert consultants?

How can we help technology companies understand what women want?

Many technology brands believe that the way to a woman's purse is to make her feel “special”, and have aimed to achieve this by giving women their “own” space, site or product. Dell's disastrous Della website, which handed out technological advice alongside recipe tips and fashion articles, was shut down within weeks. Carphone Warehouse, Dixons and Comet (Comet Angels) have all had their share of “initiatives” and women's only days, all with the aim of helping women turn the telly on. All, one assumes, with a glass of Prosecco held in their manicured, nail-varnished hands.

No woman wants to be a target with an overt "female friendly" message. Being singled out as different is as off-putting today as it was when you were singled out at school. Nor do women want to be stereotyped or bamboozled by obscure jargon. It is ironic, given its widespread reputation for untarnished machismo, but the BBC’s Top Gear has democratised cars. It might be a legacy to make Jeremy Clarkson flinch, but he has helped to make cars accessible to women. Once purely the domain of men, the programme now has nearly as many female viewers as male, thanks largely to being both playful and light-hearted. It stands for unadulterated honesty and entertainment looking at how people in the real world think and relate to their cars.

In September this year, the Harvard Business Review stated that women now represent a bigger market opportunity than India and China combined. Technology brands must put an end to these clumsy marketing strategies and put money and time behind understanding how real women in the real world engage with technology.

Women are no longer the second sex. We are the more profitable sex.

Belinda Parmar is the founder of Lady Geek http://ladygeek.org.uk, which helps technology companies understand and sell to women. Belinda would love you to have your say on how technology companies are talking to women by filling out this short survey Follow me on Twitter:

The Death of Dixons

2085942 — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:15:00 GMT

Women want brands that offer certainty and trust. Tesco have levels of trust reaching 70%, higher than any financial institution. Previously I talked about how women are reassurance addicts when it comes to technology- they will rely heavily on the sales staff or "phone a friend" before they buy technology.

Tesco entering the IT support market is a smart move.Positioning it as a female friendly service is an every smarter strategy. My research highlighted women often feel dumb walking into Dixons or PC World. It's hard to ask a spotty teenager what "RAM" means. As one women said to me when I asked her first impression of Dixons: "There was a strong scent of man"

But give women a female friendly environment where they feel they can ask silly questions and they will buy. Not only will they buy but they will buy along with their eggs, meat and the rest of the shopping. Hence tech shopping stops being a painful diversion and becomes a less-scary add-on to the shopping list. The no commission business model will also stand Tesco in good stead as so many women talk without feeling under pressure to buy.

My advice to Tesco would be to extend this service to compete with the Geek Squad and offer women help installing and servicing their consumer electronics in their home.

1) Demystifying technology.

2) Going to women's environments rather than asking them to come to yours.

3) Using women to recruit other women.

4) No commission based business model.

With a strategy like this, who ever needs to smell the scent of man in Dixons again?

I am a PC

2085942 — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:07:00 GMT

At first when I heard about the Microsoft "I am a PC" ads, my first instinct was that the world's biggest computer company should not feel the need to respond to Apple's "I'm a Mac and I'm a PC" ads which had aired more than six months ago. It signified that not only that they gave a damn but also they were likely to loose control of the debate.

After seeing the hundreth Apple ad mimicking and stereotyping the Microsoft user, I started to see Apple as the bully of the playground. Poking fun at the perceived 'not so cool' Microsoft user was like the 'IT' girl in the playground with the cooler nike trainers picking on others.

Microsoft approached me to be in the I am a PC. I wanted to do it not only to get the Lady Geek brand out there but more importantly, I am tired of the unconditional and undeserving love people have for the Apple brand. The original reason for the Apple brand being so desired, was clearly a great product but also a position of being the underdog and a brand for the non conformist.

With Apple's growth rate surpassing Microsoft, has Apple become the brand for the lazy conformist? The person who can't think past the 'mac tax' and see the new sexier brands like asus and acer chomping at their heels? Is Apple's behaviour precisely the behaviour of that which they criticized Microsoft? Have the tables turned? And ultimately, do the I am PC ads successfully connect women with Microsoft? showed some Lady Geeks the ads and they got an encouraging response.

With comments from 'I love the stories behind the technology' to 'it made me reappraise the role of technology in my life.' If its objective is to build the brand ethos first and foremost, its clearly successful. It has managed to move away from the technology and product specs and talk about what technology means to women and what they care about. It achieves Malcolm Gladwell's fundamental question of what can Microsoft mean to people over and above being a software developer.

But if its aim was to get people to reappraise Vista, then there is a fundamental problem to solve. I asked my female colleagues at work what they knew about Microsoft Vista. All are tech literate, bright and articulate 20 and 30 somethings. I got answers ranging from 'is it a credit card?' to 'something on my computer but I am not sure what.' The majority of women don't know or care what an operating system is, and could not identify Microsoft's flagship product as an example of an operating system.

Meanwhile Apple seem to have no difficulty communicating the value of OSX - it seems as if every insignificant widget is trumpeted as if it were the greatest development in computing since the invention of the mouse. Apple are fortunate to have fans who create a reality-distortion field through which apple's products appear magical - and under the same lens Microsoft's products are by definition the exact opposite.

Lovers generally tend to overlook the faults in the object of their affection and Apple have been very good at building that kind of loyalty beyond reason amongst their audience. Microsoft have never invested in building any kind of emotional connection with their audience - which is what makes their new campaign such a significant departure from their normal product-focused, conservative advertising.

With the imminent launch of Windows 7, Microsoft claim to have fixed the technical issues that disappointed so many Vista users - now the goal should be to fix the marketing so that women care about this thing that Microsoft have made, and understand how it enhances their life.