<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'freeview'</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=freeview&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'freeview'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Freeview balls-up and it's all just so some people can receive Five</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/jeremyleeonmedia/archive/2009/10/01/freeview-cock-up-and-it-s-all-just-so-some-people-can-receive-five.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:55042</guid><dc:creator>1704826</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In the finest traditions of British balls-ups, Freeview&amp;#39;s attempt at successfully managing a retuning process is well up there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fortunately I don&amp;#39;t have Freeview - telly is too important to be restricted to its limited offering - but 18m homes do. And it&amp;#39;s chaos - the websites giving details of the retune don&amp;#39;t work, people can&amp;#39;t get through to Freeview on the phone (and that&amp;#39;s just the people who know about the need to retune their sets, which I should imagine is a minority as the campaign has been so poorly communicated).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some homes will lose ITV3 and ITV4 while other Freeview boxes will cease to work at all. And it&amp;#39;s all so some more homes will be able to watch such excellent entertainment as Live from Studio Five and the &amp;#39;exciting&amp;#39; return of Name That Tune.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Which leaves me thinking the whole exercise is a waste of time, the DTT platform is fundamentally flawed and that Sky or Freesat, which update automatically, are a better option.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Freeview HD?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/media_control/archive/2007/11/21/freeview-hd.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:21:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:17060</guid><dc:creator>1841938</dc:creator><description>&lt;div class="storycontent"&gt;&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s interesting times for digital platforms at the moment. Both DAB Digital Radio and DTT (Freeview) have enjoyed much success with lots of boxes out there and lots of happy viewers and listeners. However, both systems don&amp;#39;t have a lot of expansion left in them. They&amp;#39;re filling up. This means its difficult to introduce new services and technical innovations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The main issue Freeview is grappling with is HDTV. HD takes up much more space than a traditional SD (standard definition) channel so it&amp;#39;s very difficult to squeeze in any of these channels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, Ofcom, probably under pressure from stakeholders, have issued an &lt;a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/consult/condocs/dttfuture/"&gt;interesting consultation&lt;/a&gt; where they try to find a way through these issues to find some space for some new HD channels. Basically they&amp;#39;re suggesting that one of the Freeview multiplexes (indeed, one of those owned by the BBC) is emptied with its services distributed over the others. The spare multiplex could then become an MPEG4 multiplex, which means there would be more room for HD goodness (though probably just three HD channels) alongside a couple of extra SD channels too. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, none of the existing Freeview boxes will be able to pick up these MPEG4 services, so you&amp;#39;ll need to get a new box. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally the main UK broadcasters have &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2007/nov/20/digitaltvradio.television"&gt;suddenly got together&lt;/a&gt; to plug HD on Freeview, who&amp;#39;d of thought!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DAB Digital Radio is facing similar pressures. There&amp;#39;s a new codec that will allow a stereo station to be broadcast in about a third of the capacity that an existing station broadcasts at, for roughly similar (though potentially better) quality. In theory this means you could triple the number of stations available on the platform. However, once again the majority of the existing radios won&amp;#39;t be able to receive these new DAB+ stations, not that any exist or are even planned to exist at the moment. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now traditionally radio and TV devices have lasted for decades, the concept of a replacement cycle hasn&amp;#39;t really existed for them. Whereas with other consumer electronic devices it certainly has, with buyers changing things like mobiles every 18 months to be able to access new services. Will consumers be happy to replace their TV and radio more often?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>