Search results matching tag 'US media'

How corporations killed newspapers

255762 — Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:32:00 GMT

In case you were wondering it wasn't the internet and free content that killed newspapers it was corporations. Well that's what Michael Moore has been telling people in Toronto as he promotes his film, 'Capitalism: A Love Story'.

He spent some time talking about the US newspaper business and the thousands of reporters who have been cut by their corporate bosses, which has left many beats uncovered and stories unwritten. He said he looked at including the decline of newspapers in his new film, but the subject was a documentary in itself.

He argues that American newspapers have ignored their markets and stopped writing about what people want to read. So fewer reporters covering labour and poverty issues, which if you live in Detroit (his home town) or Baltimore (home of 'The Wire's' creator David Simon) might be important.

The decline of US newspapers is, of course, a subject close to David Simon's heart and Moore says he spent time speaking with him about the subject. The final season of the 'The Wire' picks up the story of The Baltimore Sun as it goes through a new round of cuts by its parent corporation in Chicago.

The Baltimore Sun like a lot of US newspapers is in decline. In 'The Wire' we got to see its foreign bureaus shut down and reporters made redundant resulting in corners being cut and standards slipping.

Moore says it’s the cost cutting bean counters and corporations in America who have bought these newspapers like Sam Zell whose Tribune owns the Baltimore Sun and private equity firm Platinum Equity, which bought and swiftly slashed The San Diego Union-Tribune.

"These newspapers have slit their own throats,” Moore said. "Good riddance."

Worse in Moore's mind is these corporations backed the Republicans who have reduced investment in education, which means America has a growing illiteracy and comprehension problem that ultimately means there are less people capable of picking up and reading a newspaper.

Follow me on Twitter

Chris Anderson and newspapers, he doesn't care anymore

255762 — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:42:00 GMT

Chris Anderson, the Wired editor-in-chief and author of 'Free', has had it with newspapers. No seriously, he's through. He doesn't care. And journalism? And Media? Kids those words are so passe.

Anderson, who struck it big with his book 'The Long Tail' and wants everything to be 'Free', has given a long interview to the German weekly Spiegel where he makes a string of provocative statements as he talks about the internet's challenge to the traditional press.

Spiegel kicked off by asking Anderson about the future of journalism. The interview could have stopped right there. Anderson was already annoyed and made this clear. He doesn't use the word "journalism" and the word "media" is also a no no.

Anderson: This is going to be a very annoying interview. I don't use the word journalism.

Spiegel: "Okay, how about newspapers? They are in deep trouble both in the United States and worldwide."

Anderson: "Sorry, I don't use the word media. I don't use the word news. I don't think that those words mean anything anymore. They defined publishing in the 20th century. Today, they are a barrier. They are standing in our way, like a 'horseless carriage'."

It must be tough for Anderson who is (okay among other things) a "magazine editor". Sadly, Spiegel did not ask him about this, what it did ask him was what other words would he use instead of media and journalism.

And I have to tell you at this point things start to get really difficult. Apparently there are no words. That's right, like not at all.

"There are no other words. We're in one of those strange eras where the words of the last century don't have meaning. What does news mean to you, when the vast majority of news is created by amateurs? Is news coming from a newspaper, or a news group or a friend? I just cannot come up with a definition for those words. Here at Wired, we stopped using them," Anderson told Spiegel.

Is it just me or is Anderson, you know, like full of himself? I wish to add here that it isn't only me as others have also noted this "fullness".

You kind of want to jump in and shout words like: content, editorial, commentary and analysis and ask: "Don't any of these words have any meaning? Are they all redundant?".

At this stage in the interview, the German "journalist" turns to the subject of "newspapers". I'm guessing here that as "news" has no meaning then it's likewise for newspapers. I'm kind of right here as Anderson really does not care about newspapers.

Spiegel: "So did you read a newspaper this morning?"

Anderson: "No."

Spiegel: "Your local newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, is fighting for survival. If it was to disappear tomorrow..."

Anderson: "... I wouldn't notice. I don't even know what I'd be missing...newspapers are not important. It may be that their physical, printed form no longer works. "

Speigel: "So how do you stay informed?"

Anderson: "It comes to me in many ways: via Twitter, it shows up in my inbox, it shows up in my RSS feed, through conversations. I don't go out looking for it."

Speigel: "You just don't care."

Anderson: "No, I do care. You know, I pick my sources, and I trust my sources."

It strikes me that for a "journalist" (in part at least) who works in print to dismiss newspapers so out of hand as almost akin to biting the hand that feeds you. That could just be me.

Wired like every other print product has seen its advertising revenues plummet. The New York Times reported earlier this year that Wired has lost 50% of its ad pages so far this year, ranking it among the worst off of the more than 150 monthly magazines measured by Media Industry Newsletter.

How many people would miss Wired if it closed? Would Chris Anderson? Does he still want us to go out and buy it even though he gives the indication that he wouldn't got out and buy a printed publication himself (he'd have a point as he would have to pay for that "media", as it wouldn't, you know, be free).

He goes on in the interview to talk extensively about where he gets his news from. He talks RSS and Twitter. He loves these technologies (as do we all) and how he and others are still trying to figure out how we can all make money out of the web to fund our future.

All this comes after critics recently took a swipe at his new book, 'Free: The Future of a Radical Price', with the FT saying that the problem with Anderson is that he veers between sweeping statements and balancing paragraphs in a manner that leaves the reader unsure of what he is actually saying.

Follow me on Twitter

News Corp talks paid content – content bundling

255762 — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:52:00 GMT

News Corporation's new digital boss Jonathan Miller has been banging the paid content drum. His spin was "content bundling" kind of like the charging equivalent of pick 'n' mix.

Speaking in New York at the Hollywood Reporter's Digital Power event, Miller said News Corp wants to see a model established for charging online. He said he envisioned "a return to multiple revenue streams" and that part of that model could include paid-for journalism, which echoes comments made recently by his boss Rupert Murdoch.

On the kind of shape such a service might take, Miller gave a hint of what a media firm as diverse as News Corp might consider. He suggested bringing together content from different arenas under one charging umbrella – not unlike the way that digital/cable TV firms already charge whereby customers buy online, mobile, phone and TV services from one provider.

One scenario he suggested was that News Corp's various papers or various New York media, including the New York Post and the circulation of the Wall Street Journal, could be bundled together. "What works for consumers, I think -- and this has to be tested -- are bundles," Miller said.

Looking at the future of ad funded online video joint venture Hulu, Miller said it was "an environment for premium content". Suggesting that the video freebie might not be free for long.

Follow me on Twitter

DailyCaller.com to take on Huffington and Tina Brown

255762 — Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:00 GMT

Don't know much about former MSNBC and now Fox personality Tucker Carlson, but he launching a site called DailyCaller.com to take on the HuffingtonPost.com and Tina Brown's Daily Beast.

Report earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal that says pundit Carlson will launch a "conservative-leaning news site that will aim to be an answer to the Huffington Post".

"We're sincerely trying to think through what comes next in journalism," Carlson told the paper. "I think we can answer the basic question, which is: How do you keep reporting? How do you make reporting a viable business?"

As well as blog posts, Carlson is promising original reporting: "We don't simply want to be parasites of other news sites. We want to be creators of news."

The site will focus on coverage of President Barack Obama's administration, I'm guessing from a conservative point of view.

But Carlson is no Bush supporting Republican. He has said in the past that he cares deeply about conservative ideas, but he does not care about the success or failure of any political party. And Conservative Republicans have accused Carlson of not being sufficiently conservative

As well as giving the likes of the Huffington Post and thedailybeast.com (for which he has written for and he's a fan of) a run for their money (Carlson described it as a "general interest newspaper") it will also try to outpace the conservative favourite Drudge Report.

There's more on the website TV News Insider including this:

Daily Intel: So, all of the articles about your new project say that you're competing with the Huffington Post. But isn't what you are doing also competing with Tina Brown's Daily Beast, which you sometimes write for?

Tucker: Even if I could, I'd never compete with Tina, both because I love her, and also because I'm not that stupid.

Daily Intel: Says: You love her? (Thinks: Does he mean in a Harold and Maude kind of way? Ew. Don't ask that. You don't want to know the answer.) Says: That's kind of gross.

Tucker: And also true.

Life in the clickstream: the future of journalism

255762 — Thu, 28 May 2009 11:00:00 GMT

Everyone who works online and has anything to do with publishing should be reading this. A report out today that attempts to map the carnage in publishing and take a guess at the future. Full of good nuggets.

With nods to both the Guardian's Emily Bell ("We are on the brink of two years of carnage for western media") and Roy Greenslade ("Popular newspapers, the mass newspapers, are dying and will die") the starting point and the narrative of the Future of Journalism report produced by the Media Alliance in Australia is the declining fortunes of print and the challenges that disruptive technologies bring in the Australian, UK and US markets.

The starring names of this story are all there as papers like the The Christian Science Monitor fold, as others like the Washington Post, The Guardian, The Daily Telegraph and CNN rise to the challenge.

No one is immune and while no one is sure exactly what the solutions are, people do know that one thing's for sure: that news media has fundamentally changed and that publishing has to adapt to "the economic and technological landscape".

The companies that will survive and prosper will be those that remember and nurture their core business, which also have the journalists on board who are equipped with the skills to flourish in the new landscape. For the journalists, it is the ones with those skills who will prosper. Hopefully.

The investment question is as important as the question of what content we actually produce.

The report asks a lot of questions about content (it is after all what we do) and provides some answers: where are people going online and what are people doing? It looks at the kinds of content they are consuming and what that tells us.

There are some really good case studies here which offer a pick 'n' mix smorgasbord of options for publishers to choose from and experiment with. Not everything is going to work.

It takes a brief look at CNN's IReport mini-site devoted to user-generated content, which has been a real success for CNN. The news giant has learned well to adapt and ride the Web 2.0 wave like the best. Its success with UGC and other experiments like Twitter offer a lot.

It takes a look at the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, "where quotas rule".

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution restructured in 2007, targeted older reporters and editors for redundancy and divided those left into two main sections: news and information, with about 170 journalists who break news; and enterprise, with about 50 staff concentrating on features and investigations.

It then imposed controversial quotas on reporters: 60 pieces a year for narrative and profile writers, and 12 for investigative reporters.

The UK is well represented in this report and The Daily Telegraph is billed as the original "newsroom of the future". There is a quote from the paper's digital editor Edward Roussel who is worth repeating with his line that the new era calls for a new type of reporter, with the attributes of a wire journalist or a sports reporter.

"If you imagine the way a football reporter works, filing grabs every few minutes and then turning the whole thing into a story very quickly after the end of the game, that is the way our reporters work now when filing for online."

Roussel is also a believer (and really who isn't) in Jeff Jarvis's belief that success lies in premium content and that we must all live by this maxim: "Do what you do best and link to the rest".

Johnston Press' The Lancashire Evening Post and its "converged newsroom" is here with its newsroom seen as a model as to what regional newspapers can do. Its newsroom has evolved to use Sony HD video cameras, Edirol digital recorders, Soundslide for galleries and Avid Pro Express for editing videos. The Post, and its 65 editorial staff, blossomed into lep.co.uk.

Online content is discussed at every conference. Lep.co.uk publishes stories continuously and most stories appear online first. "We have the market to ourselves as a regional newspaper, so we can control our content, which is a bit different to our national papers," says Post's deputy editor, Mike Hill.

The convergence of journalism and data is looked at in EveryBlock.com. This site is the brainchild of former Washington Post journalist Adrian Holovaty. Working for the Post in Chicago, he set up chicagocrime.org to analyse daily crime reports from the Chicago Police Department’s website and reorganised the information so people could see what was happening in their neighbourhood. Now with Everyblock no matter where you live you can see what's happening with on your block - it is local news at the micro level and another example of the rise of community sites. Database-inspired journalism is much bigger in the US, but offers untapped opportunities here and elsewhere.

Bloggers on steroids/the rise of community journalism- the community model is seen as the way forward by some and a red herring by others. The report looks at in the journalist-free news operation: Examiner.com.

Examiner.com is owned and run by the Clarity Media Group in Denver, Colorado, and also runs freesheets in cities including San Francisco, Washington and Baltimore. It is owned by billionaire Philip Anschutz and run by former AOL executive Michael Sherrod. The group has domain names for hyperlocal sites in 70 US cities and has officially launched in beta in San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore, Denver, and Seattle (all markets where the paid for print titles are risk and folding like the San Francisco Chronicle and the late Seattle Post Intelligencer). Almost following the scent of print death.

The idea behind Examiner.com is pure citizen journalism with contributions from examiners paid by numbers of page views and advertising clicks (not unlike the model used by Nick Denton at Gawker Media). The pay starts at $2.50 for every thousand page views and, according to TechCrunch, the median income is $25 a month. Not exactly a future career.

"We are building a community of Examiners to focus on specific topics ranging from sports to tourism to local politics," a post on the website said recently. "Examiners are local experts who have a voice, knowledge and an opinion. Think of an Examiner like a blogger on steroids."

And so to The Washington Post, which has long been seen as a pioneer. The report looks at some of the Post's work on video, which again offers a lot of ideas. The speed and focus is impressive.

Jim Brady, Washingtonpost.com executive editor, says his team were poor relations in the pecking order until recently, but that has all changed.

Brady said the Post had introduced comprehensive training and all reporters could shoot video, which – he said – was "the hot thing now".

"We have a political blogger out there who has a camera mounted on his computer and when a big story breaks he will do the 60 seconds on what this means, and he will push a button on his computer, send it to our computer guys and 10 minutes later there will be a video of him up there reacting to Teddy Kennedy having a brain tumour … it is totally crappy video, it is a webcam, but it gets it out there.

Brady adds: "Production values are not everything – communicating simple information is what matters. You might get 10,000 video streams for something that took 90 seconds to make."

The Washingtonpost.com has six dedicated video journalists who make everything from documentary-style stories to three minute campaign reports. They are part of a team of about 100 dedicated online journalists who prepare copy from the print operation, moderate blogs, produce video and podcasts and produce original stories.

Niche for news junkies. Here the report quotes the American Journalism Review's Philip Meyer who recently envisaged a “smaller, less frequently published version, packed with analysis and investigative reporting and aimed at well-educated news junkies, that may well be a smart survival strategy for the beleaguered old print product".

That sounds like a description of a news magazine as much as it does a newspaper. The model is the same - as long as what you offer is the best in your field representing premium value to advertisers then you will find a market.

Ownership and partnerships are looked at as the report concludes. Both hot topics. Will US newspapers like the Los Angeles Times and The New York Times become grand old charitable trusts?

What new partners do we need to find, and does this mean looking in areas where you may not have looked before as being 'frenemies' becomes the new norm as companies join rivals in joint ventures, each contributing what they do best.

This report comes in the same week that the World Association of Newspapers had its conference (issued this: Newspaper Circulation Grows Despite Economic Downturn) and both see reasons to be optimistic as they look to the future where many models, new and old, look like they will co-exist. This will doubtless mean that a lot less trees will be needed.

Follow me on Twitter

Boston Globe fate hangs in the balance

255762 — Tue, 05 May 2009 11:33:00 GMT

The fate of the Boston Globe is hanging in the balance this week as the New York Times Company moves towards a deal with unions, but one with journalists is so far out of reach.

According to a report in the Washington Post, the New York Times Company has backed off from threats to close the paper temporarily at least. It has reached agreement with six of the seven unions that operate at the Globe, but crucially not with the union representing journalists, the Newspaper Guild, which represents 600 editorial staff.

The remaining $10m of cuts the New York Times Co wants to see have to come from the Newspaper Guild, which said it has offered a proposal that has met management's demands. But the New York Times Company says the Guild hasn't come gone far enough.

But even if they do agree the $20m cuts its nowhere near the $85m that the paper is going to lose this year.

There are a number of sticking points. While both have proposed ways of cutting $10m in pay and benefits the Newspaper Guild and the New York Times Company have gone about it in different ways. The Guild has proposed pay cuts of 3.5% as well as longer working hours and reductions in benefits. The New York Times Company wants pay cuts of 23%. There is a lot of distance between those two figures.

That said, that isn't even the main stick point. This is the fact that the union is demanding that the lifetime job guarantee is retained. I can see why they want this. Once that is lifted it is likely the New York Times Company could use it as a way to cut jobs. In particular it would get rid of expensive long serving staff. It is what happens.

But what do you do? The New York Times Co has the Guild over a barrel as the US newspaper industry goes down the pan faster than you can say, I don't know, pan? And with the Boston Globe set to lose $85m (to recap) in 2009 there is no way it can not continue with those kinds of losses for long as pretty soon you will end up with no newspaper and no jobs at all. Period.

It's sad in so many ways as people will lose their jobs, and we're all concerned for the future, but some jobs have to be better than no jobs?

There's loads of coverage around on this here at the Washington Post with more at the New York Times and not forgetting the Boston's Globe's comprehensive coverage of its own troubles.

While down market rival the Boston Herald reports that if talks do fail and the New York Times decides to sell or close the paper, it might not get that much for the asset it paid $1.1bn back in 1993.

Also worth a look is the Wall Street Journal's useful map and table tracking trials and tribulations of the US newspaper industry.

Follow me on Twitter

Fall in US newspaper sales is accelerating

255762 — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:16:00 GMT

The economy and swine flu is bad enough, but while big stories fill the front pages of US newspapers, new figures show that the rate of decline in print circulation has accelerated since last autumn.

According to a report in the New York Times, figures out on Monday show a more than 7% drop compared with the previous year.

The industry knows where these people are going as well, but it doesn't help. They aren't going away, they are going to the web. As circulation falls accelerated, newspaper website traffic increased 10.5% in the first quarter, but revenue gains have come nowhere near matching that increased audience.

The only paper out of the top 25 in the US to post a circulation increase was The Wall Street Journal, but that rose only by 0.6%, according to the US Audit Bureau of Circulations.

Many of the falls are double digit at newspapers whose future is in doubt like the San Francisco Chronicle (down 15.72%), Houston Chronicle (down 13.96%) and The Boston Globe (down 13.68%).

Top 25 US newspapers by paid average weekday circulation

Title                                                       March 09        +/-

USA TODAY                                         2,113,725    -7.46%
WALL STREET JOURNAL                   2,082,189    +0.61%
NEW YORK TIMES                              1,039,031    -3.55%
LOS ANGELES TIMES                           723,181    -6.55%
WASHINGTON POST                             665,383    -1.16%
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS                      602,857    -14.26%
NEW YORK POST                                  558,140    -20.55%
CHICAGO TRIBUNE                               501,203    -7.47%
HOUSTON CHRONICLE                        425,138   -13.96%
ARIZONA REPUBLIC                              389,701   -5.72%
DENVER POST                                       371,728     N/A*
NEWSDAY                                               368,194    -3.01%
DALLAS MORNING NEWS                     331,907    -9.88%
MINNEAPOLIS STAR-TRIBUNE             320,076    -0.71%
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES                           312,141    -0.04%
SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE             312,118    -15.72%
BOSTON GLOBE                                    302,638    -13.68%
CLEVELAND PLAIN DEALER                291,630    -11.70%
DETROIT FREE PRESS                         290,730    -5.90%
PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER                     288,298   -13.72%
NEWARK STAR-LEDGER                       287,082   -16.82%
ST. PETERSBURG TIMES                      283,093   -10.42%
OREGONIAN                                           268,512   -11.76%
ATLANTA JOURNAL CONSTITUTION    261,828    -19.91%
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE               261,253     -9.53%

Elsewhere, the New York Times has some personal stories from the heart of the downturn and how some reporters are being hit.

One is that of Todd Smith, a reporter from the St Louis surburbs who was covering a city hall story for the Suburban Journals when a man with a gun and a grudge stormed the building and fatally shot six people, before being killed by the police. Smith was short through the hands, but survived. In April he was laid off.

"I thought my job [as the online editor] was pretty safe," he said. "And yeah, I thought getting shot for the company might be looked at as something important, but I guess not."

There is a happier story from Arizona. Paul Giblin and Patti Epler, former journalists at The East Valley Tribune outside Phoenix, were laid off earlier this year and with a few colleagues started The Arizona Guardian, a news site supported by subscriptions and advertising.

Since then, Giblin and Gabrielson have won a string of awards for their project at The Tribune, including, last Monday, a Pulitzer Prize.

Follow me on Twitter

State of Play - new media versus old

255762 — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:34:00 GMT

Some cracking reviews of the 'State of Play' movie appearing, which has amongst its many plotlines something of the current clash between new and old media, between print and bloggers, about it. It is almost portrayed as print's last stand as the bloggers charge in.

It has an apparent credulous portrait of a blogger played by Rachel McAdams as Della Frye, who stars opposite the grizzled old school journalist Russell Crowe, who takes on the role of Cal McCaffrey, with Helen Mirren as his editor. She says wanker and buggers a lot. She would wouldn't she, she's a British newspaper editor in America.

It's being talked of as the kind of film that they don't make anymore, about newspapers and conspiracy theories, with nods to classics such as 'All the President's Men' and 'The Parallax View', while remaining thoroughly modern.

The film comes at a crossroads moment for newspapers and a lot of reviewers have talked about how it is a film about the death of old journalism and of newspapers, but at the same time asks pertinent questions about the future of the fourth estate.

The Los Angeles Times says one of the questions that director Kevin Macdonald asks is "what happens when journalists aren't there to ask the difficult questions of politicians?". It's a good question, maybe someone will forward an email to Guido Fawkes.

The LA Times goes onto say that the film "captures the feeling of an industry in transition, perpetually under economic pressures from the outside, while inside a battle for supremacy reigns between the brash but unseasoned young bloggers and the traditional hard-charging gumshoe reporters".

The Times has Crowe as a "newspaperman who has no respect for the ubiquitous internet bloggers and their opinions", but he finds himself partnered with the paper's resident internet "whizz kid, Della" on a story involving his former college friend, the US Congressman Stephen Collins (Ben Affleck).

The blogger angle is a nice update from the excellent BBC One TV series even if on the screen there is really little time to explore that debate before we see Della learn to "be a real reporter" from old hand Crowe. Early on in the film when Crowe meets McAdams Della character he says he will have to read a few blogs before he forms an opinion. The New York Times put it like this: "Each has so much to learn from the other. What Della learns, charmingly if none too plausibly, is that some stories lie too deep for blogs and can only truly live on the smudgy, crumply page."

But as the Huffington Post has it "Della Frye never establishes an identity of her own, we never really learn what kind of blogger she is, what she likes to write about, or how she feels about the current tug-of-war that exists in the newspaper community."

Maybe in the end in State of Play the battle print and the bloggosphere is not the real one. It is not about a battle of the mediums. That's a distraction and a red herring, maybe a misreading of the world by director Kevin McDonald. The other battle here is the corporation that owns the Washigton Globe and is putting Mirren's editor under pressure to cut costs and turn a profit. We never learn much about them, but one images a Sam Zell type character, the real estate billionaire who snapped up the Los Angeles Times owning Tribune, which is now in Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Whatever, it is fun to see a film set in the world of newspapers. The original newspaper setting in the BBC TV series was modelled on the Guardian, although the Washington Globe in the film is modelled on the Washington Post. Well they did give us Woodward, Bernstein and Watergate.

Still The Guardian has its starring role in the third Jason Bourne film 'The Bourne Ultimatium', which also had an investigative reporter at the heart of its plot – even if it were more about bullets, blocks and punches than the more cerebral 'State of Play'.

Old media or new, with The Times calling it "exhilarating, compulsive storytelling" that is "likely to be one of the year's cinematic highlights", it looks more than worth a cinematic visit.

Tales of US newspaper gloom: Phoenix, Detroit and Boston

255762 — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:45:00 GMT

A few more interesting bits out of the Newspaper Association of America with stories about how badly several newspapers are faring after implementing major changes.

I blogged yesterday about what Google CEO Eric Schmidt told executives in San Diego, but Fortune has a story today about how three newspapers that have undergone tough format changes are doing: not well.

The first was a presentation from the East Valley Tribune, which publishes near Phoenix in Arizona. In January it went from a seven-day paid newspaper to a four times a week free paper with an expanded web presence.

In doing so it cut 40% of its staff when it made the switch, but that wasn't enough and a few weeks ago the East Valley Tribune's owner Freedom Communications asked staff to take five days of unpaid leave.

The Arizona Republic has dubbed these new style unpaid vacations "Fur-cations".

The Fortune piece also gave a few more details on how the two Detroit newspapers are doing following their recent switch from seven day a week home delivery to three.

The Detroit Free Press and Detroit News, run under a joint operating agreement between Gannett and Medianews, are now delivered only three days a week and according to Dave Hunke, the CEO of the Detroit Media Partnership, around 85% of the papers' advertising revenue is now generated on those three delivered days.

The future looks grim when you look at the state of Motor City. Hunke listed skyrocketing unemployment, foreclosures and a market where 47% of adults are functionally illiterate as the challenges the titles faced. "We send more children to prison than to college. So we've got quite a problem on our hands."

As for the changes to the way the papers operate it is, Hunke said, too early to tell.

In New York and Boston, there are reports today of how badly the $20m cuts the New York Times Company wants the Boston Globe to make have gone down. Staff at the Boston paper feel pretty much like they are being thrown to the wolves.

As if the rivalry between the New York Yankees and the Boston Red Sox's wasn't enough (best not to mention that New York media firm also owns a slice of the Sox and Fenway Park). It is the New York Times today that carries a story about the "mix of resignation and anger" that staff on the Boston Globe have expressed after hearing yesterday that of the pay and benefit cuts and the lost job security that The New York Times Company wants them to accept as the price of keeping the money-losing Globe in business.

The Times said that members of the Boston Newspaper Guild understood the need for cuts, but were shocked at how much the company was asking.

“The company’s demands are outrageous,” said Daniel Totten, the union’s president. “We’re willing to consider some concessions but not the draconian amount they put forth.”

Another report in Fortune with the headline "New York vs Boston: this time it's personal" puts into perspective how importantly the city sees the Boston Globe.

"The Globe helped build our city," Boston Mayor Thomas Menino told Fortune. "The Globe holds people accountable on the issues, and that's important. You might not like it sometimes. Sometimes we don't agree. But they ask tough questions and back it up with data, real data. That's what's important. They're out there doing their work. It would be a real travesty if they weren't around."

The sad truth is for the grand Boston paper that it lost $50m last year and is set to lose a whopping $85m this year.

“They want us to accept those figures without offering any observation of the books,” said Julie Dalton, a copy editor. “People feel like The Times is willing to throw us overboard.”

Blog posts of the newspaper crises

Also online

Read Brand Republic's full coverage of how the downturn is hitting the US newspaper industry

Follow me on Twitter

Bad day to kill print in Detroit/Is there an e-reader future?

255762 — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:16:00 GMT

The irony gods were working double time yesterday. The biggest news day in Detroit for years (GM chairman axed, Chrysler and Fiat and big hoop news) was the day that its two newspapers ended their home delivery service and the web couldn't cope.

You can't make stuff like that up. The Gannett owned Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News, owned by MediaNews Group, had until last week been landing on the doormats of Motor City residents like they have for years, but Detroit's two papers are in bad shape and costs had to be cut, bringing an end to home delivery.

Since 1990 Detroit News has seen its circulation tumble 64.4% and the Detroit Free Press 53.12%. Between them they have lost 660,000 plus copies and the future is grim; for the papers and the city so closely linked to the US car industry.

Then comes the brave new dawn of no more home delivery Monday and a hammer blow is struck at the city and at the American newspaper industry.

Such a juicy news day: The White House pushing out GM CEO Rick Wagoner; pushing for Chrysler to merge with Fiat; and Michigan State University basketball team making the Final Four.

It was a real D-Day of news, a real Day of Days, but nothing on the doorsteps. The Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News were sending readers online, but it is not the same for some.

One reader, Nancy Nester, 51, a program coordinator at a traumatic brain injury centre who subscribed to both papers for four years, told the New York Times: "This morning, I felt like something was missing. There was this feeling of emptiness."

Let's call it the print gap.

The thing is she didn’t go to the store and buy a copy as "I don't have time to stop at the store. That’s why I have home delivery".

Instead of home delivery on Monday, The News and The Free Press distributed half a million free copies of a condensed print edition before it is back to the 50 cent cover price today.

The two want people not only to go to the web, but to the e-editions of the papers. At the moment these are free, but soon e-editions will be for paying customers only.

I have never had much time for e-editions. I know there are some good ones out there, but the whole process of trying to reproduce a facsimile of a paper product online seems like a waste of time to me. I don' t like reading them (on a monitor at least). Give me the web or the real thing.

That said, maybe Amazon's Kindle will change that. Maybe there are those out there who will pay a subscription fee to read their daily newspaper on an e-reader. Even me, I could see THAT happening and I could see people parting with some cash and some cash is better than no cash.

Some people already like them that way, but with as many as 50,000 people trying to click on the e-editions in Detroit yesterday, five times as many as usual, the NY Times goes onto report that the computers "delivering the e-editions could not keep up on Monday morning, and many people were unable to load them".

"We had an overwhelming — literally overwhelming — number of people trying to get onto the e-edition site this morning, and it’s gratifying on one hand, but it slowed things down," said Jonathan Wolman, editor and publisher of The News, which is owned by MediaNews Group.

For one generation the jump to an e-edition is clearly too much, but for another there is always Jean-Luc Picard.

Follow me on Twitter