<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'Jonathan Harris'</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=Jonathan+Harris&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'Jonathan Harris'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>Who will be the Digital David Ogilvy?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/three_minute_happiness/archive/2009/02/11/who-will-be-the-digital-david-ogilvy.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:37521</guid><dc:creator>1696774</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s been a while since i posted here, been busy in NY helping Dare set up and all that jazz. Anyway, there is an interestng debate going on over these parts about whether digital creativity is up to scratch or not. &lt;a href="http://www.randallrothenberg.com/" title="RR"&gt;Randy Rothenberg&lt;/a&gt;, president of the IAB no less, has weighed in saying he thinks we are all sub par and will never reach the level of David Ogilvy or Bill Bernbach. Is he right?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Course he&amp;#39;s not. Randy&amp;#39;s
notion that digital creativity sucks is a pretty weak argument. Who is
to say who will be the Bernbachs or the Ogilvy&amp;#39;s of digital? It&amp;#39;s
pretty unlikely that there will be *no one* - the odds just don&amp;#39;t stack
up. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="comment-content" id="comment-148253685-content"&gt;
			
			&lt;span id="comment-148253685-content"&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Someone will become that famous, at the time DO and BB were not
gods, merely people running their own agencies. They became gods in
history. It&amp;#39;s so much easier to look back and say there was all this
great work but for every &amp;#39;Lemon&amp;#39; there were a million real lemons - bad
press ads, bad commercials, that no one ever talks about. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I should imagine the percentage of &amp;#39;good&amp;#39; versus &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; digital work
is identical to the percentage of &amp;#39;good&amp;#39; versus &amp;#39;bad&amp;#39; work in every
other media in every other era. It just so happens that we are in the
middle of a new era so it&amp;#39;s easier to scrutinize / criticize. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We can have a sensible debate (if talking about meaningless stuff
that sells meaningless products could ever be described as sensible!)
in 10, maybe 20 years time. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the meantime it&amp;#39;s always fun to guess though isn&amp;#39;t it? So who would you think is the person most likely to be remembered as the digital daddy? At the moment my money would be either on the artist Jonathan Harris or Ben Palmer from Barbarian, with an each way bet on me and Flo ;-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
		&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>