<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'ITV FriendsReunited'</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=ITV+FriendsReunited&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'ITV FriendsReunited'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>ITV/FriendsReunited</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/morw/archive/2009/03/05/itv-friendsreunited.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:39143</guid><dc:creator>1736064</dc:creator><description>&lt;div class="post-body entry-content"&gt;Just adding some rather random thoughts to this&lt;a class="" title="story" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7922770.stm"&gt;&lt;font color="#666699"&gt; story&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_0"&gt;ITV&lt;/span&gt; pay £150-175m for something that is now worth £2.50)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It is so rare to find an acquisition that goes right &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_1"&gt;isn&amp;#39;t&lt;/span&gt; it? (a round of applause for &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_2"&gt;DMGT&amp;#39;s&lt;/span&gt; purchase of &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_3"&gt;Jobsite&lt;/span&gt; though!). The typical story tends to be large corporate has strategy vacuum but feels the need to do something. Consultants are employed and feel the need to recommend something. Both of these end up with &amp;quot;lets go out and acquire something&amp;quot; 
&lt;li&gt;Now just possibly this acquisition&amp;#39;s main purpose is for the page 1-3 story in FT of the announcement that &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_4"&gt;indicates&lt;/span&gt; that company is getting all web - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_5"&gt;e-commerce&lt;/span&gt; - international - moving up supply chain (delete as appropriate) 
&lt;li&gt;After Day 1 - the company then have to think &amp;quot;what the hell are we going to do with this&amp;quot; 
&lt;li&gt;In &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_6"&gt;FriendsReunited&lt;/span&gt; - it was lets stick a job board on it - and dating - and classifieds. That must have taken about 5 &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_7"&gt;mins&lt;/span&gt; to come up with! 
&lt;li&gt;Execution in all areas - pretty appalling - and short term view taken so parts are closed down 
&lt;li&gt;Almost from Day 1 - &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_8"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; site is completely engulfed by better technology - proper Web 2.0 and presumably a complete lack of inspiration to pick up &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_9"&gt;the&lt;/span&gt; challenge from &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_10"&gt;ITV&lt;/span&gt; 
&lt;li&gt;In all likelihood - all the board who bought it (and consultants who advised buying it) have moved on and it can be safely binned 
&lt;li&gt;They have &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-corrected" id="SPELLING_ERROR_11"&gt;announced&lt;/span&gt; that would be prepared to sell it for £50m - any takers? - no - didn&amp;#39;t think so - it would be like buying 34 year old crocked footballer who was once a star player - so &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_12"&gt;ITV&lt;/span&gt; better hope Newcastle or West Ham are in the market. I cant imagine what the true value would be - but not a great deal for a product in terminal decline that does not have an established revenue stream. 
&lt;li&gt;I saw this quote in one of the pieces &amp;quot;Last year &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_13"&gt;ITV&lt;/span&gt; claimed Friends Reunited had doubled its monthly unique users to 5.5m after switching from subscriptions to an ad-funded model&amp;quot; - 5.5m monthly &lt;span class="blsp-spelling-error" id="SPELLING_ERROR_14"&gt;uniques&lt;/span&gt; - really?? - it may be true but does anyone know anyone who has been on this site for the last 3 years? &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;div style="CLEAR:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>