A loss of £16.5m is a lot, but when you take into account start-up costs and dummy-run costs, it's not that much really, especially when it was originally launched as a spoiler to Associated's London Lite. I'm sure Rupert thinks it's money well spent to make sure Associated doesn't get a grip on a potentially profitable market.
And it's a small price to pay to cross-promote NI's and News Corps' other products, like The Sun, the News of the World, Collins books, Sky TV, 20th Century Fox movies, MySpace, etc etc. In that way, I'm sure the loss has been more than worth it.
Personally, I'm still waiting for Richard Desmond's legendary London Eye, the "paper" that got the other two off their arses but has yet to surface. Bated breath, tricky Dicky, bated breath.