Blogs

Word on the street

Comments: 4
Rating:
 

Talk about low hanging fruit. As Tory leader David Cameron planned his moral-high-ground strategy on the parliamentary expenses scandal last week, one line on the MPs' expenditure sheet caught his eye.

MPs can claim £10,000 a year as a 'communications allowance' in order to correspond with their constituents; such 'communications' take the form of mail-merged letters (style: circa 1990) informing constituents of MPs' clinics and door-dropped newsletters full of bad photos of MPs on their rubber chicken rounds.

At Prime Minister's question time last Tuesday, Cameron ridiculed the literature MPs produced with the allowance.

"Let's be honest taxpayers are effectively paying out thousands of pounds so we can all tell our constituents what a wonderful job we are doing," he said at PM's Question Time. "Isn't this a gigantic waste of money? Scrap the communications allowance now."

The use of leaflets, inserts, door-drops by MPs wouldn't be such an easy target if they were properly used.

It's a shame, because leaflets - handed out or door-dropped - are a potent political marketing tool.

Why, even in President Obama's digital-centric election campaign last year, leaflets (used to full effect, that is) managed to grab national headlines.

Perhaps the fault lies in the relatively miniscule amount granted for MP communications. Compared to the profits being made by ministers and MPs on the sale of second homes, an allowance of £10,000 is small beer.

I can't help wondering what direct marketing's finest printers would do for MPs' communications, given a decent budget and a meaningful message to deliver.

All Comments

  May 19, 2009

The key paragraphs in Noelle's excellent article are:

"The use of leaflets, inserts, door-drops by MPs wouldn't be such an easy target if they were properly used."

"It's a shame, because leaflets - handed out or door-dropped - are a potent political marketing tool."

As a door drop company we have our own feelings on Mr Cameron's comments which we have blogged at: http://cli.gs/m4gR8N

Pingback from  David Cameron is right. MPs' direct mail and door-drops are awful … | thedirectmailsecrets

  May 20, 2009

Cameron is not right. MPs have a duty to communicate with constituents. If they are doing it badly (and some do it well), let's help them improve. That's not a reason for cutting the allowance.

Of course, that would mean only rich MPs would have the funds for communications. Which is what Cameron wants.

  May 22, 2009

For a prime example of the 'awful political door drops' genre, there's always the BNP leaflet that I got through my door the other day (Chris - you post on the posties delivering these (or not) is also excellent).

Aside from the fact that these are obviously hateful little bits of paper, I have seen misspelled pizza leaflets and takeaway fliers very obviously written by non-English speakers that had better production values and more persuasive copy. Even if the poor posties could bring themselves to deliver these pieces of tripe then I doubt that they could convince even a wavering national front member of their merits.

To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT