Information Commissioner Richard Thomas is at it again pushing the data security button, raising concerns about how both government and business are handling personal records. This time he highlighted the issue at the recent DMA conference where he said there have been more than 400 breaches in data security since late 2007.
This comes on the heels of the commissioner putting the commercial sector under the spotlight in a report last month – and he clearly wants more teeth for dealing with private companies. But is that what’s really needed?
I’m sorry but let’s face it, the data transgressions of any private organisations still pale in comparison to what we have seen the public sector: HM Revenue & Customs loses personal details on 25 million people, British Council loses personal details on 2,000 employees, Government loses 12 million personal details in pub car park, 25 million child benefit records lost, 7,000 Northern Ireland drivers details, MOD has 658 laptops stolen in just four years, three million drivers details lost from the UK in Iowa in the US, and so it goes on.
So if I seem wary about any public officials criticising the private handling of data, forgive me. But if I get one more piece of bureaucratic claptrap or red tape ruling from some idiotic government related burke sitting in some high rise office in London informing me of yet another guideline or instruction that I should follow in order to maintain ‘data security’ I will blow a bloody gasket.
I have a better idea: why don’t we as an industry offer to train Government officials in terms of security? After all, the DM and data industry is still by far the most successful sector at policing the movement of data.
And if I read one more time that Government is outsourcing its data requirements to places as far flung as Iowa, Bombay or the Philippines I will throw myself against a brick wall. HELLO?! We are here in the UK and we are data specialists, so call me for a quote pleeeeeeeeze. Is it just me, or do others out there feel the same?