Skip To Site Navigation

Blogs

Seedy thoughts

 A few years ago I was thinking of setting up a club called  “Five Creative Directors Behaving Badly”.


The idea was fairly explanatory in the title.


I think the members were gonna be me, Robert Saville, Trevor Beattie, Dave Droga  and Robert Campbell.


But rather than just getting p*ssed, there was another agenda, which was that we’d throw our collective weight around. If we didn’t like the way Cannes was behaving, we’d threaten to boycott it. If we felt that Campaign’s treatment of anyone or anything was unfair, we’d let them know.


But it never took off. Because I was too lazy to make it happen.


And it would be even harder to do it these days.


Because – what’s happened to Creative Directors ?


And is there any chance in hell of any of them behaving badly ?


If you want to know what a creative director’s role should be, you could do a lot worse than look at Alex Bogusky.


Because he’s forged an agency which produces great work at a time when just about everybody else seems to have given up.


When he was asked what he did,  he answered – it’s simple, it’s about picking the right idea and making it as good as we can.


And that IS simple to say.


But doing it is another matter.


That’s why pitches are decided on chemistry. Because it’s a lot easier to pick a bunch of people you like than it is to pick a good idea.


That’s why research is king. Because picking the right idea is …  f*cking scary, if you’re serious about it


In Hollywood there are people who make decisions about creativity every day, who’ve done it for years, and they sh*t themselves while trying to pick the next one.


Here, we give the decision to a bunch of disinterested people eating Kettle’s crisps in a room with a suspiciously smoky mirror on one wall.


Picking the right idea is what creative directors should do – it’s what Alex Bogusky does brilliantly, it’s what Dave Droga does brilliantly.


But we’ve done away with the concept here in Britain.


Well ok, not quite – Robert and Richard are outstanding.


And just to be perfectly clear, I’m not questioning the rest of the talent here in the UK. We’ve got probably got more creative talent than ever before. I’m questioning the politics of the industry right now.


The attitude of the industry.


A few years ago, a friend of mine was tasked with answering the question as to why WPP won a lot fewer creative awards than Omnicom agencies.


He did a very meticulous analysis, the precise details of which now escape me.


But having compared all the variables, he concluded that there was only ONE significant structural, difference between the two groups.


Omnicom agencies back then were run jointly by people from creative and account management backgrounds.


WPP agencies were run almost exclusively by people just from account management backgrounds.


And these days it’s not just an issue for WPP, it’s an issue for our industry as a whole – the fact that, currently, creative talent is hired not partnered.


The people who set up the legendary old agencies were all, largely, creatives.  From David Abbott through to Leo Burnett through to David Ogilvy.


But unless you work in Fallon or Mother, when was the last time your Creative Director made a decision that actually carried any real weight ?


A lot of the big network agencies don’t even seem to have ECDs anymore.


Creative Directors used to be the people who made a difference.


Now they’re just people who can be wheeled out for pitches to make small talk.


I’m surprised they don’t all want to  behave really, really badly.





All Comments

  November 2, 2009

It's all too late. The double-speakers have got their feet firmly under the table. If I was the Gandalf of Creative Advice travelling with the Fellowship of the Talented Young Creative, I would cry 'flee you creative fools, flee!' before falling into an abyss.

  November 5, 2009

Great post, as usual, Steve. To add to your debate I'd question the evolution of the role of marketing directors and brand managers in client organisations. Generally, they're rubbish. Harsh, but fair. To disguise their inadequacies they move job every five minutes - the optimum lifespan of bullshit. And account men are perhaps more inclined to conspire in this confederacy of dunces than creatives. We're more inclined to get shouty and cross (or is that just me?). Taking risks requires trust trust. And trust is established over time and through shared experience. Bearing in mind the brand manager on one of your main clients will have changed three times while you read this, its difficult to see how that trust can become established. Maverick creatives need risk-disposed clients but they're as common as talent on the X Factor

  November 5, 2009

Great post, but I think you underestimate the difference between advertising and all other creative industries right now. The BBC is heavily influenced by 'research' and run mainly by accountants and all Hollywood movies are screened in the LA equivalent of Slough, to a team of teenagers and often reshot accordingly. Maybe in comparison, some areas of advertising may actually (believe it or not) leave the creative director more freedom. It's worth remembering that the Office was very nearly never shown and the BBC developed The Full Monty and passed on it. More account handlers fearful of their jobs at work. These people can only really say 'no', never 'yes' and any show that's currently being shown on TV has generally had to have worked in another territory. Advertising has been dealing with kettle chip munchers for ages and at least some have garnered a skill at keeping them at bay. Reminds me of a famous head of art who showed me a big pile of research he'd just received then proceeded to open the window and throw it out. Keep up the great work.

  November 6, 2009

i agree with Phil, it's like we've entered a new McCarthy era. creatives have no say in anything anymore, we've turned into a service industry.

we're told what to do and if we question it (quite reasonably) we're thrown out.

there's no room for opinions or any kind of individual thought and everyone's too scared to stand up for anything.

the only place any real truth is spoken is on blogs such as these by people hiding behind fake names. i think it's a really very sad state of affairs.

advertising could be really amazing but most of the time it's just really VERY boring.

there's no spontaneity, no colour, no passion, no originality. qualities that were once prized in a creative are now seen as flaws.

we've turned into an industry of androids. controlled by the powers that be, the men with the fat wallets.

the irony is, if the advertising was better, their wallets would get even fatter.

we've lost 'the big idea' it's just about the latest widget or gadget and the small ideas that fit into them, rather than using them to explore and enhance 'the big idea'.

  November 13, 2009

Thanks for this post Steve, I was having the very same conversation over lunch with an Account Man at a rather successful boutique agency in London that's shareholders structure consist of 2 parts creative (team), 1 part account man and 1 part planner. I think this is the right sort of balance to ensure clients are kept reasonably happy without undermining our creative principles.

To comment on this post you have to be logged in

Search Community

 
 

About this blog

Steve Henry's Blog
Contributors

Blogging for:

Steve Henry's Blog

Member since: 19 Nov 2008

Last login: 16 Nov 2009

Total Posts: 52

Archives

Popular Tags

Syndication

 
ADVERTISEMENT