Steve Barrett

August 2008 - Posts

So what are we to make of Stephen Miron's surprise move to jump ship from Associated Newspapers and take on a completely new role as chief executive of radio at Global Group?

It's a big change of scenery for arch-networker Miron, who will run the group's enlarged radio division following its acquisition of GCap Media. But he is extremely smart and ambitious and probably felt that, after five years as managing director of The Mail on Sunday, it was time to take on a bigger role of a type not immediately available at Associated.

Aside from confirming a story run by Media Week in May about Global seeking a big hitter to run radio in a senior ops role reporting to group chief executive Ashley Tabor - inexplicably aggressively denied at the time by Global and its PR company - Miron's move raises questions about the future structure of commercial operations at Northcliffe House.

It is ingrained in the fabric of Lord Rothermere's media empire that internal competition brings out the best in its brands and people. That flies in the face of what's going on at other newspaper groups, where brands are coming closer together and being sold as a package. What has happened elsewhere is unlikely to be replicated at Associated, but it could be time to look at joint client sales teams for example, though joint agency sales teams would be a step too far.

It is also not beyond the imagination to see one individual running it all, such as the Daily Mail's managing director Guy Zitter. Alternative options include elevating one of Associated's other MDs, Andrew Mullins at the Evening Standard or Steve Auckland at Metro, to Miron's vacated role. Then there's the second rung of executives, such as ad directors Simon Davies, John Teal or Rosemary Gorman. But it's more likely they would move over to the Metro or Standard if one of the other MDs stepped up to the Mail on Sunday job.

Associated could hire externally, though that is a longer shot. Or it could look at promoting someone else to the role who is well-regarded internally, such as group marketing services director Linda Grant - that's where some of the smart money is going at the moment.

The biannual ABC magazine circulation figures have become something of an anachronism. Once eagerly awaited by publishers, they prompted wild celebrations or intense soul searching, depending on results.

Last Thursday, many senior magazine executives weren't even around to mark the latest data, for January to June 2008. It's August and many people are away. But I can't help feeling holidays would once have been planned with the ABCs in mind. Now it seems as though people deliberately go away to avoid the doom and gloom of yet another round of circulation declines.

This is partly to do with the nature of modern magazine publishing. Magazines are no longer just print products - they are brands spanning multiple platforms, including the web, mobile, radio and even TV. But, as with newspapers, measurement systems haven't caught up. Maxim, for example, posted a staggering circulation decline of almost 60%, but Dennis Publishing chief executive James Tye counters that the "magazine" reaches one million people across all platforms. NME and Kerrang! come into the same category.

Some hard-luck stories mask legitimate developments. Bauer Media's More dropped 37% year on year, but sells more copies in total because it has switched from a fortnightly to a weekly. The same applies to BBC Worldwide's Doctor Who Adventures. And it's worth noting that the big six publishers (five if you take Bauer as one entity) - IPC, H Bauer, Bauer Media, NatMags, BBC Worldwide and Conde Nast - still posted circulations totalling 21 million. That's a significant reach and an attractive audience for advertisers.

Measurement systems must evolve to include all platforms. But only about 5% of magazines currently commission an ABCe audit - and many of these are out of date. Media Week has started including a top 10 ABCe circulation list in its ABC supplement - free with this issue - but it is slightly artificial when so few are measured. Until all publishers buy into the ABCe system and get regular audits, they can hardly complain that print ABCs aren't representing their brand reach properly.

Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT