Steve Barrett

June 2008 - Posts

If there's one major bugbear that comes up when media owners get together, it's that media agencies don't represent their properties sufficiently strongly to clients.

Understandably, media owners imagine their particular TV channel, radio station, newspaper, magazine or group of properties is unique - and it consumes all their time and attention. They suspect those nasty media agencies sway advertisers' money towards the media owners that give the agency the best trading deals and bring them most profit, rather than to the media property that will best suit the client's brand or campaign.

It's why media owners have made strenuous efforts to get closer to clients. And it's why communications planning hot-shops such as Naked sprang up, claiming to offer truly neutral media planning because they don't sully their hands with media buying.

I'm sure there's some truth in this - human nature dictates it. But the counter argument is that the consolidated modern media environment requires effective agencies to have a very powerful buying operation behind it - whether at group level or in-agency.

This was all brought into focus when I interviewed Honda's media guru, Ian Armstrong, and OMD UK's managing director, Jonathan Allan, for Media Week TV. I asked them what advice they would offer media owners wanting to better represent their offer to clients and agencies. The answers were illuminating. Allan's advice was pithy but pertinent: "Listen, don't sell." And Armstrong advised them to realise that clients have a fixed investment to spend and that they're not going to allocate it all to one media owner: "Don't be precious and realise that there are different priorities and different objectives throughout a year."

It's good advice and there's much more where that came from in the full interview, which goes live at www.mediaweek.tv

One of the most difficult things to get right in many fields of activity is succession planning, and this is just as true in business as it is in other areas.

No matter how capable he is, Prime Minister Gordon Brown is finding it almost impossible to fill the shoes of his smooth-operating predecessor Mr Blair. And the poor soul who has to eventually take over from the legend that is Sir Alex Ferguson at Manchester United Football Club will also find that mantle a problematic one to assume - no matter how talented they are.

In the media world, a group of charismatic, entrepreneurial individuals blazed a trail in the '80s and '90s, setting up agencies that have become the engine rooms of modern media buying and planning. Jonathan Durden, David Pattison, Nick Manning, Colin Gottlieb and Christine Walker are just some of these legends.

Many have now moved on or are enjoying well-earned semi-retirement. Meanwhile, the next generations have to deal with their intrepid founders' legacies but also blaze their own trail and position these now-mature businesses for a very different 21st Century media environment.

In some cases, the transition has been smooth; in others, the growing pains have been more severe. Interviewing Philippa Brown recently, the chief executive of Omnicom Media Group and acting chief executive of PHD UK, I was struck by the fact that she had had to adopt a very firm and proactive strategy to put PHD back on course.

But, of course, she had the benefit of a clear mandate from her boss - who happens to be one of the aforementioned legends - to make these changes, something that may not have been afforded to her immediate predecessor in the top seat at PHD.

Don't forget to submit your entries for the Media Week Awards: the deadline is this Friday, 20 June. This is also the deadline for the inaugural Guardian Newspaper Planning Awards, in association with Media Week. And finally, the deadline for the AOL Online Planning Awards, in association with Media Week, is Friday, 4 July.

Having now finished Jonathan Durden's first novel I can report back on more echoes of the real world within its pages, which I have to admit were very easy to turn.

First of all, don't read on if you don't want to know some of the details of what happens in the book.

Only two real-world media characters appear under their own names in Essex, Drugs and Rock'n'Roll as far as I can tell: Tom Toumazis of Disney, and Mirror Group Newspapers and Media Week's own David Emin. They appear fleetingly as fellow diners lunching at media haunt St Alban. Durden's good friend Emin is described rather unflatteringly as, "a short man resembling Morocco Mole from the 60s Secret Squirrel cartoon"...

More characters that might have echoes of real-life people work at lead character Mark Cohen's ad agency BC (shortened from Bond Craze, named after the founders Andrew Bond - "God" - and Patrick Craze - "the Devil"). They include S&M-loving head of global account management Julia Hardy-Roberts, who agency deputy chairman Cohen has a torrid affair with and who ultimately negotiates the acquisition of BC having moved to Interpublic Group. Then there's Cohen's glamorous PA Ellie, who dispenses favours out on the fire escape, and sexy, middle-aged receptionist Cherry.

I previously reported on a character called "Derek Peterson", which apparently was the in-house nickname of one of Durden's fellow founders of media agency PHD. Later in the book, it transpires that wide boy Peterson resides in a mansion called "Wattapenis Palace"... There is no sign in the book of characters called Julian Dorking or Neil Hunter, however.

I will leave any analysis of possible self-redemption in the novel to others, but for anyone interested in advertising and media, or black comedies, I would recommend it as a fun read - especially the description of a pitch for Primo bleach.

One of the fun things about reading media legend Jonathan Durden's first novel is trying to work out which bits are fact and which bits are fiction.

The same applies to some of the characters in the book, which are often thinly veiled caricatures of people who may or may not exist in the real world.

Durden's magnum opus,
Essex, Drugs & Rock'n'Roll, is out at the start of July. The lead character, Mark Cohen, is a 40-year-old advertising executive with "a lifestyle to die for and enough designer trappings to pass any Essex bling audit". Remind you of anyone?

I have only read the first few chapters so far, but I was particularly taken with another character, called "Derek Peterson", who is introduced to the reader early in the piece. I couldn't help thinking this guy might bear some resemblance to a certain well-known agency colleague of Jonathan's in his days at PHD, but then I read the description of "Derek":"If Danny DeVito had ever successfully mated with a Bee Gee, Derek would have been the result. Short, fat and bald, he wore white suits and high-neck shirts with vast, brightly coloured lapels. His belt buckle was custom-made and had 'Bite Me' inscribed on it in giant gold letters, while his underpants bore the legend 'Beware, long vehicle'."

Hmm, maybe not. Or maybe it's a private joke between the two of them. Either way, the book looks like a lot of fun and I will report back with any other interesting echoes of the real media world as I read on.

What Sir Martin Sorrell says is always worth listening to, even if he does have the habit of trotting out the same stuff, presumably as a process of reinforcement or because he does so many speaking engagements.

I caught him at the Advertising Association’s summer reception at the House of Lords last night. He reinforced his previously stated belief that 2008 would not be as bad a year as a lot of people think, although he conceded that developed advertising markets such as Western Europe and the US would have a much harder time than developing economies such as China, Russia, Brazil and India. He warned that the downturn would be as serious in developed markets as it was in the early 90s, with 2009 expected to be a tough year and green shoots of recovery emerging in 2010.

But he was quick to point out that his company, WPP, is no longer an "advertising" firm, and that the name "Advertising Association" was something of a misnomer in the world of modern communications. Only about half of Sorrell’s group revenues now come from what would traditionally be called advertising – including 15% attributed to media planning and buying, which, encouragingly for us in the media world, he called the engine room of future growth. The rest comes from things like market research and digital.

Ad Association chief executive Baroness Peta Buscombe admitted that they had been thinking about their branding and considering new names with communications in the title rather than advertising, so watch this space for a possible re-brand at the AA.

Sorrell advised the advertising industry to keep the wheels of the industry turning in the coming tough times by investigating communications strategies that will persuade consumers to change their behaviours or even to consume less, which led to mutterings from people in some parts of the room, who find that whole concept an anathema.

But I was most interested in the fact that he split digital out as a separate category in his analysis of WPP’s revenues. Surely the whole concept of the modern communications industry is that agencies should offer their clients integrated planning that isn’t platform-specific?

As I hope you will already have noticed, Media Week has had a fresh lick of paint this week.

It's not a "rip it up and start again" redesign, more an evolution of what we've been doing since Haymarket acquired the title three years ago: with a fresher look and feel, a few new elements and more integration between our offline and online offer.

New elements in the revamped Media Week include: Planet Media - a double-page spread, one-stop shop, weekly roundup of everything that's happened in the commercial media world; Meet the Client - a different client advertiser profiled every week; Globetrotter - a weekly Q&A with a UK media professional who is working abroad; and Planning Casebook - a weekly case study highlighting best practice in media planning and communications strategy.

The changes have come about after a period of consultation with you, our readers. They will give the top media players within the client community - your clients and advertisers - the opportunity to have more profile in Media Week.

They reflect the increasingly global nature of media and the respect with which British media professionals are regarded abroad. And they introduce more opportunities for us to profile the excellent planning work that media agencies are engaged in, from concept to execution and effective-ness, from the point of view of the lead media planner.

I would love to know what you think of the new, improved (hopefully) Media Week. I'm genuinely interested in your feedback, whether positive or negative. And we want your suggestions for clients, globetrotters and case studies that we should be featuring in the magazine in the future.

Magazines have to evolve constantly these days, otherwise they go backwards, and this is part of our continuing evolution to serve you in the best possible way. I hope you will like what we've done and that it helps you and your teams to do your jobs better.

Page 1 of 1 (6 items)
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT