Steve Barrett

From the editor of Media Week

It’s coming up to the usual February half-yearly magazine ABC time and, as is becoming usual these days, Media Week is faced with a quandary as to how to cover it.

On the one hand, there is little doubt that print magazine circulations are in general declining. Our sneak previews into the men’s and women’s monthly and weekly markets show no signs that this trend is set to end.

On the other hand, as Dennis Publishing’s chief executive James Tye points out in this week’s print issue of Media Week, the web sites and digital operations of all magazines are expanding exponentially and attracting lots of traffic and unique users. Tye points out that Maxim now attracts 776,000 monthly unique users, over twice the audience the print title had at its peak. Digital-only products such as Dennis’s Monkey are also being successfully developed. So, the news isn’t all bad for the magazine sector.

Now it’s not Media Week’s job to be a cheerleader for the sector; it is our job to report facts and trends accurately and in a balanced fashion, highlighting negatives as well as positive developments in equal measure.

However, as the premier title for the media industry - print and online hopefully - we have no desire to foster an atmosphere of doom and gloom about any media sector, including magazines.

But it is significant that Dennis, whilst naturally delighted at the traffic it is attracting to its digital brand extensions, chooses not to obtain an ABCe certificate for Maxim.

Until all magazine publishers, ABC and ABCe can get round a table and thrash out a scenario where digital traffic is also measured, or an overall reach figure is calculated for each magazine brand, the magazine sector is faced with the prospect of being hamstrung by the biannual doom-fest that the magazine ABCs are becoming.

 

All Comments

  January 24, 2008
Doom OR gloom, eh Steve? Well there’s an appetising choice! Just before we get all Davos and talk ourselves into a recession, let’s pause for breath. It’s not all bad news in the magazine market - at least not in the men's sector. Take the long view: before 1994 total market volumes were modest, GQ, Esquire and the others together shifted well below 200,000 per month. Then came the monster, mainstream monthlies, led by Loaded and FHM. Volumes of men’s titles rocketed to over two million copies by the end of the decade. Then in 2004 the weeklies launched and overall volumes soared again, to above 3 million per month. You see the pattern: at every turn, the market has been boosted by innovation in content, or price, or frequency, or format, or distribution methodology. And often a mix of some or all of those factors. Before every new explosion in volumes there is a lull. During every lull sceptics quickly conclude that men have fallen out of love with magazines. With respect, I’ve heard that too many times to agree. Actually, the men’s magazine market is fit, vibrant and only doing what it has done with striking regularity over the last 15 years - innovating again to meet the needs of its readers. Now, I would say this, wouldn’t I? But here are the facts: ShortList and Sport are attracting hundreds of thousands of new, quite upmarket male readers in their 20s, 30s and even 40s into the market every single week in London (in Sport’s case) and Nationwide (in ShortList’s). Their scale and editorial quality make both titles powerful, distinctive and valued. And their readers are every bit as passionate about their magazines as the readers of men’s titles were in the 90s. Get the content, character and the delivery right and it need be neither doom nor gloom for any magazine sector. Roll on those ABCs!
  January 31, 2008
Mike - yes, it was a crap headline, you are correct. This being t'internet, I have changed it to better reflect the thrust of the argument. I admire your confidence in the sector and look forward to seeing many more advertisers flocking to ShortList and Sport after the next set of ABCs.
To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT