Blogs

Ritson on Brand

Comments: 2
Rating:
 
It's A Wonderful Life is one of the greatest movies ever made. In a pivotal scene, the hero George Bailey, faces a run on his family bank from worried investors convinced they are about to lose their savings.

By making an impassioned speech about community and trust, Bailey persuades most of his panicked customers to believe in the bank and not withdraw their money. At 5pm, with a single dollar left in the safe, he closes the door and saves the day.

Alas, there is no Bailey on hand at Northern Rock. Instead, worried staff were forced to call in the police on Friday, while chief executive Adam Applegarth spent Monday reassuring customers all was well, with the startled look of a man on the edge.

The financial explanation for the plight of Northern Rock is simple. Since going public, the bank has grown by cutting back its operating costs, offering low-interest mortgages to price-sensitive savers, and borrowing heavily from other banks to fund its transformation into the UK's fifth-biggest mortgage lender. There is no doubt that Northern Rock's initial problems were caused by changing credit markets, which forced it to approach the Bank of England last week. But what is really interesting is why it has fallen from grace so quickly.

It was only last Thursday morning that rumours of problems began to emerge. Within 24 hours, lines were forming and phone lines were jamming. Barely five days later, the bank and its share price were in free fall. An almost total absence of brand equity meant that when they were faced with even the smallest indication of trouble, too many customers attempted to empty their accounts completely.

Northern Rock has no reservoir of brand equity because it is a victim of its own success. Applegarth is proud of transforming his company into 'the most cost-efficient bank in Europe'. But by cutting back on branches and personal service, and encouraging customers to bank online and by phone, he also destroyed brand equity. Northern Rock was no longer Diane the bank clerk at the branch on the high street, it was a flickering cursor on a computer screen or a recorded menu choice at the end of an 0800 line.

While it's true these approaches are far less expensive to operate, they are also far less likely to build trust. When the cursor stopped flicking this week and the phone lines went dead, panic erupted.

Northern Rock is also a victim of its own successful targeting strategy. The bank has been able to grow by tempting customers to re-mortgage through its low-interest loans. This price-sensitive segment is easy to attract, but also easy to lose and reacts badly to crisis. These customers moved their mortgage to Northern Rock not because of emotion, history or relationships, but because it was cheap. Those who had banked there for decades and believed in what it stood for would have been more accepting of the credit squeeze.

The irony for Northern Rock is that, after years of destroying its brand equity, it has achieved its goal - it is trading at a huge discount to its tangible net assets. Unlike brands that add value through the intangible asset of brand equity, Northern Rock's brand is worth significantly less than the sum of its parts. One of the big banks can now acquire it for less than the value of its loan book and infrastructure, and make a significant profit in doing so. The Northern Rock brand name, of course, will be discarded. By now the only brand equity it possesses is likely to be negative.

Applegarth should be pleased. He has created a bank so lean that it will soon no longer exist.

All Comments

  September 18, 2007
Brand equity squmequity! Show me a bank that can survive with a similar tidal onslaught of primetime negative publicity, and I'll show you a bank that has impeccable public relations connections. Yes, I'll agree that perhaps some positive 'brand equity' would have rubbed off on the TV, radio and newspaper reporters and editors to limit the damaging headlines, but really Northern Rock were screwed from the onset with their unintelligent and fear-inducing media communications. In my opinion the only thing that could have prevented their downfall post media-panic was stellar public relations to kill the story.
  September 18, 2007
err, that should be 'schmequity' not 'squmequity'! sp?
To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT