Blogs

Ritson on Brand

February 2007 - Posts

McDonalds Repositioning???

Is McDonalds really repositioning itself successfully?

The textbook says no. The figures say yes.

Designer chairs, better coffee than Starbucks, ethical focus, environmental packagin, sales up....

According to the todays FT McDonalds are succeeding in the mother of all repositioning jobs.... I still think that they cannot pull it off but so far, their sales data is saying yes.

 

Burger, fries and a shake-up

 

By Jenny Wiggins

Published: February 26 2007 18:13 | Last updated: February 26 2007 18:13

The lime green “egg” chairs designed by Arne Jacobsen, the eminent Danish architect, would look more at home in a modish coffee shop than in a London branch of McDonald’s.

But that is exactly the impression Denis Hennequin, who is in charge of all the chain’s restaurants in Europe, wants to create.

“It’s very modern and contemporary,” the 49-year-old Frenchman says. “Much better than Starbucks.” With Howard Schultz, chairman of Starbucks, this month expressing concern over the encroachment of fast-food operations on his business, the timing is apt.

The chairs (called egg for the way they cocoon the body) can be spotted near the windows of McDonald’s branches on British high streets. They are part of Mr Hennequin’s grand plan for redefining the brand, which entails other changes in interior and exterior design and additions to the menu.

“I’m changing the story,” Mr Hennequin says. “We’ve got to be loyal to our roots, we have to be affordable, we have to be convenient . . . but we have to add new dimensions.”

These dimensions include putting iPods in restaurants in France so that people can sit and listen to music; making better coffee from fair trade-style beans; and introducing a “McDonald’s passport” so young staff members can work at any restaurant in Europe.

The changes seem to be working. Sales at McDonald’s European franchises are growing faster than in other regions. Last month, Europe (which accounts for about 36 per cent of annual profits) reported quarterly comparable sales growth of 7.3 per cent against 5.9 per cent in the US. And a survey in Consumer Reports magazine this month gave McDonald’s coffee a higher rating than that of Starbucks.

Worldwide, McDonald’s managers – who were lambasted in the late 1990s and early 2000s for their restaurants’ poor food, bad service and tacky decor – have been trying to update the image of their brand. The success of coffee chains such as Starbucks, which appeal as much to workers on the move as to students, has forced companies like McDonald’s to create a more sophisticated eating environment.

While its focus on costs sets limits on the quality of McDonald’s ingredients, healthier foods have appeared on menus and restaurants have been refurbished, leading to better global sales. Last month the restaurant chain reported record annual profits of $4.4bn (£2.3bn).

But it is developments in the European business that may provide the best guide to where the McDonald’s brand will go in future.

Mr Hennequin, a graduate of one of Paris’s top law schools who joined McDonald’s after deciding it would be more “fun” than being a lawyer, was appointed to run Europe after making a series of successful changes to its French outlets in the late 1990s.

He does not look like a typical McDonald’s executive. Unlike many of the chain’s American managers, who dress in white shirts and suits, he wears no tie and lets his blue shirt hang out over corduroy trousers. He carries a small backpack containing a black Apple Macintosh laptop computer. A self-confessed “brand freak”, he includes Apple among his favourites.

Nor does he act like most executives. In the 1990s, he established a design studio in Paris and started spending money creating more congenial environments in French McDonald’s. Visitors would be served by hosts in ties and jackets, and offered free chocolates with their coffee. The changes were risky, given that US management was trying to cut costs.

“At the time, I was swimming against the current . . . But our chairman at the time came over here and wanted to understand and in the end he said: ‘If it works for you, just do it.’?”

The investment paid off. Comparable sales in France rose consistently between 1997 and 2005. Now Mr Hennequin wants to emulate those changes elsewhere in Europe.

Asked if he thinks the McDonald’s brand has suffered because of its slowness to adapt to changing consumer tastes, Mr Hennequin smiles and looks up at the ceiling. “No comment.”

He argues that it is hard for large corporations such as McDonald’s to change. “It’s been such a successful business model that you’re always bouncing between ‘let’s do it because it works’ and ‘if it’s not broken, don’t fix it’,” he says.

He has a three-pronged strategy: improve the experience of customers and employees, make sure restaurants adapt to local communities, and be more transparent about how McDonald’s does business.

Getting rid of fixed plastic seating and replacing it with more comfortable furniture, including upholstered seating and imitation leather banquettes, have been the first steps in improving customer experience.

McDonald’s design studio has developed 11 designs that franchisees can choose from (64 per cent of its European restaurants are franchised). The most popular designs use low-hanging lampshades, wooden tables or long communal tables and poufs.

“When Starbucks is charging you £2.50 for the coffee, it’s not because of the coffee; it’s because of that casualness that you can build around your restaurant,” he says. “I think we can do that very easily.”

For his employees Mr Hennequin introduced the “McPassport”, which contains details of training and language skills and enables the holder to work in any branch in Europe.

The passport is designed to appeal to Europe’s mobile young. “One of the biggest aspirations of kids is to travel around,” says Mr Hennequin, who expects the passport to get a lot of use in countries such as Greece and Italy during summer.

Mr Hennequin came up with the idea after friends in France asked him to help their children get work at McDonald’s restaurants in London. He realised the attraction the city held for young people. “Working in London was suddenly something cool,” he says.

But while he may be happy to see his employees shift countries, he wants the restaurants to retain local customs. “We’re not the United States of Europe,” he says. “We’ve got 41 countries at very different stages of development and we’ve got to respect that.”

He wants to bring in more franchise partners to help stimulate new ideas. “I strongly believe that new ideas and innovation come from the field,” he says. And he encourages restaurants to serve foods that locals like.

In Portugal, soup is on the menu and when Mr Hennequin is in London he eats the porridge that McDonald’s serves for breakfast along with McBacon rolls and sausage and egg McMuffins. “I don’t think it would work in France but why not, I’m trying it!” he says.

Then he confides: “To be honest, I’m not too excited by it. Every time I come to the same conclusion: the bagel and cream cheese is more my thing.”

Restaurants’ healthy outlook

McDonald’s, having for so long served as global shorthand for junk food, has had to grapple with society’s increasing distaste for unhealthy eating.

After introducing salads and sandwiches to its menus, the chain is still trying to make its food healthier. Late last year it announced plans to cut back on unhealthy trans fats.

In a bid to create greater transparency, McDonald’s has been running an “open doors” programme in which customers are invited to go behind the scenes at restaurants and suppliers. In Poland, 50,000 people have taken up the offer. The chain is also putting more nutritional information on packaging and sourcing foods from sustainable sources.

A new three-tier pricing strategy sells products at a range of prices for people on different budgets.

Another initiative involves introducing more McCafés – counters selling coffee and pastries inside McDonald’s restaurants.

Mr Hennequin says the group has more work to do in addressing consumers’ environmental and ethical concerns. He wants outlets to use less plastic and recycle more. “I’m going to redesign packaging for Europe,” he says.

The group is also sourcing more foods from sustainable sources and Mr Hennequin plans to extend the use of Rainforest Alliance coffee beans throughout Europe. The beans, which are certified by a non-profit group that monitors environmental standards and workers’ welfare, are currently used only in the UK.

In the long term, Mr Hennequin hopes his changes will transform McDonald’s image from a “fast food” restaurant chain into one known for serving “good food fast”.

 

 

Prince Charles attacks McDonald's over fast food

by Alex Donohue Brand Republic 28-Feb-07, 09:00

LONDON - The Prince of Wales has attacked McDonald's for its perceived negative impact on healthy lifestyles, claiming that banning the fast food giant holds the key to improving people's diets.

In a further broadside against McDonald's, the Prince is reported to have made negative comments about the restaurant chain to nutritionist Nadine Tayara and journalists during a visit to a medical school in Abu Dhabi yesterday.

He said: "Have you got anywhere with McDonald's? Have you tried getting it banned? That's the key."

The Prince, who is a strong supporter of organic farming and fresh produce, has restated his views on healthy eating but his remarks have been met with dismay by McDonald's, which branded the criticism "disappointing".

Nick Hindle, spokesperson for McDonald's, said that younger members of the Royal Family "have probably got a more up-to-date picture of us", referring to the Prince's son Harry being spotted eating at McDonald's in 2005.

Hindle said: "This appears to be an off-the-cuff remark in our opinion. It does not reflect our menu or where we are as a business."

A spokesperson for the Prince of Wales said: "[The Prince] was keen to emphasise the need for children to enjoy the widest variety of food and not to eat any particular sort of food to excess."

However, the criticism will come as a further blow to McDonald's efforts to reposition itself as a more health-conscious and ethical retailer ahead of Ofcom's restrictions on junk food ads, which will be introduced on April 1.

McDonald's signed a £1m in January to buy coffee from South and Central America farm co-operatives, in an attempt to improve its image as an ethical retailer.

Posted Feb 27 2007, 12:09 PM by Mark Ritson with no comments

Brand Jobs Even You Wouldn't Want

There are always those strategic roles and consulting jobs that appear to be beyond the skills of even the greatest marketing mind.

Cue music from Mission Impossible. Teletext joins the list....

There have always been impossible jobs in marketing.

The head of corporate social responsibility for Exxon Mobil.

The head of PR for Ryanair (if they ever got round to having one)

Uk Marketing Manager for Dasani

Head of Interactive Division for HMV

But a new impossible mission has just begun. Teletext is launching an £8m revitalisation campaign designed to convince the market that it is not out of date. No, not at all.

 

The new positioning for Teletext: "Teletext. No blah blah". The idea is based on communicating that in a world filled with complex up to the minute advanced information sources, a slow, clunky, hard to access technology with bad brand equity is a wonderful opportunity.

Posted Feb 27 2007, 11:19 AM by Mark Ritson with 1 comment(s)

Every Little Helps - Tesco in Brand Revitalisation

Rumours abound that Tesco are undergoing a major brand review. What? Why? Who? When? Eh?

All the questions and none of the answers...

 

 

 

 

Its always been one of the hardest moments in my MBA course on Brand Management. We bow down and worship at the altar of Tesco's marketing, research, segmentation, private label, brand architecture, leadership and then comes the positioning problem.

There is no question that Tesco is, pound for pound, the greatest marketing company in the UK. And yet at the heart of its magical transformation through the 1990's, usurption of Sainsbury, and global emergence is one of the tattiest, most generic little straplines imaginable. Every Little Helps. And it sits squarely within the famous 'steering wheel' - see above that has guided Tesco for most of the last 10 years.

The best you can say for the ELH strapline is that it is tight, it does unite staff, and its a appropriately plain and simply approach for the famously tight, no-nonsense Tesco brand.

But finally, perhaps, the penny has dropped and Tesco are about to focus on a richer more complex positioning. Don't expect a BIG relaunch or lots of fancy wheels and traingles when Tesco eventually launch their new positioning.

But it will be very interesting to see what they come up with and (perhaps even more interesting) who they will turn to for help in developing it. Inhouse? The Red Brick Road? Landor?

 

Posted Feb 27 2007, 11:06 AM by Mark Ritson with 1 comment(s)

jet VERY blue

Starting with a Valentine's Day disaster in which Jet Blue passengers were stranded for 11 hours - America's formerly much loved budget airline is now in trouble.

The brand was founded on 'Bringing humanity back to air travel" and "making the experience of flying happier and easier for everyone". It is now facing a very difficult crisis that has destoryed much of its hard won brand equity.

 

 

THE INITIAL PROBLEMS: 

 

NBC11.com

More Jet Blue Flights Canceled, CEO 'Mortified'

POSTED: 8:17 am PST February 19, 2007

 

Low cost fares, quirky blue potato chips and even a mea culpa from JetBlue Airways' founder may not be enough to ease passenger anxiety Monday as the airline braces for another day of disrupted flights.

 

The company said it would be canceling almost a quarter of the day's flights but hopes to be fully operational on Tuesday, almost a week after a Valentine's Day snowstorm created a meltdown for the airline.

 

David G. Neeleman, the company's founder and chief executive, said he was "humiliated and mortified" by the breakdown in the airline's operations. He promised in an interview with The New York Times for its Monday editions that in the future the company would pay penalties to customers should they be stranded on a plane for too long.

 

Neeleman blamed the crisis on poor communications and a failed reservation system. He said the ice storm had left many of the airline's 11,000 pilots and flight attendants a great distance from where they could operate the planes. He also said JetBlue lacked trained staff to coordinate the flight crews. The reservation system had also been overwhelmed.

 

The airline had scheduled 600 flights for Presidents Day, more than the 550 to 575 flights on a typical Monday. Of those, 139 flights have been canceled, JetBlue announced late Saturday night.

 

JetBlue Airways Corp. spokesman Sebastian White said headway was being made on Sunday, but that the cancellations on Monday were needed to make sure all flight crews had gotten the legally mandated amount of rest before taking to the skies again.

 

"Canceling one more day's operations will really help reset our airline," White said.

 

All flights on JetBlue were canceled in and out of 11 airports: Richmond, Va.; Pittsburgh; Charlotte and Raleigh/Durham, N.C.; Jacksonville, Fla.; Austin and Houston in Texas; Columbus, Ohio; Nashville; Portland, Maine; and Bermuda.

 

White said the airline had tried to warn passengers through phone and e-mail of flight cancellations over the past couple of days, and was in the process of doing so for Monday's flights. JetBlue has been trying to reduce the backlog of passengers through a number of methods including flying charter flights, adding flights in certain sectors, rebooking passengers who had some travel flexibility to later dates, and booking seats on other airlines, White said.

 

The cancellations followed hundreds of other canceled and delayed flights since Wednesday, when a snow and ice storm grounded jets at John F. Kennedy International Airport through the weekend.

 

Passengers scrambled to deal with the disruption of their plans.

 

"Oh my God, horrendous," Maria Arbelo, a teacher from New Haven, Conn., said of her experience. "It's been a terrible ordeal, I tell you. We've been from line to line."

 

Arbelo and two companions had been ticketed for a JetBlue flight to Houston on Saturday morning to begin a Caribbean cruise. That flight was canceled, as were all flights to Houston on Sunday. The airline put the three women up in a hotel for the night, and placed them on a Sunday evening flight to Cancun. From there, they would have to find a driver to take them on a four-hour trip to meet their ship.

 

Arbelo said JetBlue staffers had been nice, but seemed confused about what to tell passengers. "I laugh about it because there's nothing we can do," the teacher said, resigned to losing two days of her vacation.

 

Baggage handlers also struggled with the mountain of luggage returned to the terminals because of the cancelations. Some passengers complained that they couldn't leave the airport, even after their flights were canceled, because no one could find their bags.

 

White said the airline had teams out in New York City and Long Island on Sunday delivering luggage to customers.

 

JetBlue's service hot lines became overwhelmed by people trying to rebook flights.

 

Affected customers may receive refunds or rebook their flights, the airline said.

 

The airline said it initially tried to get its system back to normal by selectively canceling flights Thursday and Friday, but long delays continued as a result of constraints that included a one-runway operation at JFK on Thursday, and flight crews burning through the number of hours they are legally allowed to work before taking a rest.

 

Prior to the current crises, JetBlue was overwhelmingly popular, offering affordable fares, in-flight snacks of blue potato chips and DIRECTV.

THE APOLOGY :

Jet Blue Apologizes to Customers
2/23/2007 11:18:49 AM

Dear JetBlue Customers,

We are sorry and embarrassed. But most of all, we are deeply sorry.

Last week was the worst operational week in JetBlue's seven year history. Following the severe winter ice storm in the Northeast, we subjected our customers to unacceptable delays, flight cancellations, lost baggage, and other major inconveniences. The storm disrupted the movement of aircraft, and, more importantly, disrupted the movement of JetBlue's pilot and inflight crewmembers who were depending on those planes to get them to the airports where they were scheduled to serve you. With the busy President's Day weekend upon us, rebooking opportunities were scarce and hold times at 1-800-JETBLUE were unacceptably long or not even available, further hindering our recovery efforts.

Words cannot express how truly sorry we are for the anxiety, frustration and inconvenience that we caused. This is especially saddening because JetBlue was founded on the promise of bringing humanity back to air travel and making the experience of flying happier and easier for everyone who chooses to fly with us. We know we failed to deliver on this promise last week.

We are committed to you, our valued customers, and are taking immediate corrective steps to regain your confidence in us. We have begun putting a comprehensive plan in place to provide better and more timely information to you, more tools and resources for our crewmembers and improved procedures for handling operational difficulties in the future. We are confident, as a result of these actions, that JetBlue will emerge as a more reliable and even more customer responsive airline than ever before.

Most importantly, we have published the JetBlue Airways Customer Bill of Rights—our official commitment to you of how we will handle operational interruptions going forward—including details of compensation. I have a video message to share with you about this industry leading action.

You deserved better—a lot better—from us last week. Nothing is more important than regaining your trust and all of us here hope you will give us the opportunity to welcome you onboard again soon and provide you the positive JetBlue Experience you have come to expect from us.

Sincerely,

THE FALLOUT: 

JetBlue Rides Out the Turbulence

February 22, 2007

By Mike Beirne

CHICAGO -- The customer bill of rights and the $30 million that JetBlue Airways will hand out in vouchers and expenses related to last week’s operations meltdown could deliver more impact than any marketing executed by the seven-year-old airline. Or the new policy’s downside is it creates an entitlement that would make profitability even more elusive.

By proactively enacting its own customer bill of rights, the No. 9 carrier, in terms of operating revenue, has grabbed industry leadership on the issue of reconciling with passengers on delayed and canceled flights. That policy eventually will include compensation for lost or late luggage, said airline spokeswoman Jenny Dervin. It’s a reform that flyers—particularly grass roots groups like the Coalition for Airline Passengers’ Rights and "Travel Insider" e-newsletter publisher David Rowell—have been pleading for since long before 1999 when 4,000 of Northwest Airlines passengers were stranded, some for up to eight hours, on airport tarmacs during a Detroit winter storm.

The JetBlue situation isn’t an oddity. On Dec. 29, Texas thunderstorms kept flyers cooped up for eight hours in an American Airlines plane with overflowing toilets. Thousands of Christmas travelers found themselves late or stranded during 2004 when a glitch in crew scheduling software grounded COM air and US Airways flights.

“I can almost hear the grumbling of the legal departments at some traditional airlines saying 'no way, we can’t have a passenger bill of rights; do you know how much money we would lose?'” said Gene Lewis, a partner at Digital Pulp, a New York digital agency whose clients include Lancôme and Continental Airlines. “Jet Blue is not afraid to do something that will cost them a lot of money. It is admirable.”

Whether JetBlue has set a gold standard that legacy carriers must follow is uncertain. The big carriers have plenty of routes where it doesn’t compete with the discount airline. “I don’t think the legacy carriers are prepared to create this brand new entitlement unless they feel they have to keep Congress from passing its own bill of rights,” said Joe Schwieterman, transportation professor at DePaul University. He adds that paying compensation on JetBlue fares that cost as little as $100 is cost-prohibitive. Also, with no relief in sight for the congestion at JetBlue’s home, New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport, and weather becoming more difficult to predict, the bill of rights might create an incentive for canceling flights.

Jet Blue’s policy offers vouchers equal to the roundtrip cost for flights canceled within 12 hours from scheduled departure. Not everyone is convinced that the JetBlue Bill of Rights will be meaningful to customers, particularly if it creates a relationship where stranded travelers become more irate because their delay fell 10 minutes short of receiving a full price trip voucher. “They nickel and dimed it,” said Peter Warren, chairman and CEO of Warren Kremer Paino Advertising, a New York shop whose clients include Palace and Helmsley hotels and the Maine Office of Tourism.

“My philosophy is go big or go home. Up until now (CEO David) Neeleman has been that big guy. He’s not in the transportation business; he’s in the experience business. He had an opportunity here to really go big by offering free travel with very dramatic compensation. From a PR perspective, Neeleman has been perfect,” said Lewis of Digital Pulp. His agency handled crisis management duties last May when Bausch & Lomb recalled contact lens cleaning solution after the Center for Disease Controls determined its ReNu with MoistureLoc was linked to fungal eye infections in 109 patients.

JetBlue is deftly using the immediate and interactive tools of the Web to get its apology out there after Neeleman appeared on TV networks and major publications saying he was “mortified and humiliated” by his airline’s lack of performance. In the video apology on Jetblue.com, a buttoned-down Neeleman promises “the events that transpired last week ... will never happen again.”

“There’s a campy feel to the video,” said Lewis. “It doesn’t seem rehearsed. It feels very much like a JetBlue conversation to the individual and I think that is what people expect to see. He says things that are very definitive. He’s not making side-sweeping political statements. They’re really making some very definitive contributions to the relationship.”

The Web page also includes an e-mail solicitation and an explanation of the company’s Customer’s Bill of Rights. Passengers will be compensated based on the length of delays with vouchers ranging from $25 to the full amount of a fare. In the video, Neeleman outlines two responses to boost customer service: Training non-airport employees to serve as a sort of SWAT team that can reinforce gate employees and help match flight crews with planes, and training reservation agents to help passengers book alternative travel plans.

The airline will use the Web for updates but only when there is meaningful progress to report and additions to the Bill of Rights. The carrier also sent apology e-mails by Wednesday and updates to its TrueBlue loyalty club members, but will use that communication sparingly so the messages won’t be perceived as spam. E-mail feedback solicited so far is 80% for versus 20% against the airline.(

“(The majority) is positive in the sense that they’re saying I’ll be watching you to see if you live up to your promise, but I’m just giving you one more chance,” said Dervin. “The 20% that is negative is at least is very instructive with people telling us why they will never come back to the airline.”

Dervin related a telephone conversation with one New York gentlemen who vowed never to fly JetBlue again. He even declined an offer to spend an hour with her and carrier managers to explain his decision. JetBlue brass intend to host town meetings in the markets it serves and are soliciting suggestions from customers on how to host those gatherings. “We know the next time we have a system delay our customers are going to get out their stop watches because they have an expectation,” said Dervin. “We have to deliver on that expectation.”

--Mbeirne@brandweek.com

Posted Feb 27 2007, 12:13 AM by Mark Ritson with no comments

That Starbucks Memo

Is there anything better than a leader leading? Better yet, a marketer taking the lead with the brand that he helped to found? Here is the memo Starbuck's Chairman Howard Schultz sent out to senior staff pointing out that the company's growth had come at a great cost to brand equity. Poetry from beginning to end. Poetry.

 From: Howard Schultz
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 10:39 AM Pacific Standard Time
To: Jim Donald
Cc: Anne Saunders; Dave Pace; Dorothy Kim; Gerry Lopez; Jim Alling; Ken Lombard; Martin Coles; Michael Casey; Michelle Gass; Paula Boggs; Sandra Taylor

Subject: The Commoditization of the Starbucks Experience

As you prepare for the FY 08 strategic planning process, I want to share some of my thoughts with you.

Over the past ten years, in order to achieve the growth, development, and scale necessary to go from less than 1,000 stores to 13,000 stores and beyond, we have had to make a series of decisions that, in retrospect, have lead to the watering down of the Starbucks experience, and, what some might call the commoditization of our brand.

Many of these decisions were probably right at the time, and on their own merit would not have created the dilution of the experience; but in this case, the sum is much greater and, unfortunately, much more damaging than the individual pieces. For example, when we went to automatic espresso machines, we solved a major problem in terms of speed of service and efficiency. At the same time, we overlooked the fact that we would remove much of the romance and theatre that was in play with the use of the La Marzocca machines. This specific decision became even more damaging when the height of the machines, which are now in thousands of stores, blocked the visual sight line the customer previously had to watch the drink being made, and for the intimate experience with the barista. This, coupled with the need for fresh roasted coffee in every North America city and every international market, moved us toward the decision and the need for flavor locked packaging. Again, the right decision at the right time, and once again I believe we overlooked the cause and the affect of flavor lock in our stores. We achieved fresh roasted bagged coffee, but at what cost? The loss of aroma -- perhaps the most powerful non-verbal signal we had in our stores; the loss of our people scooping fresh coffee from the bins and grinding it fresh in front of the customer, and once again stripping the store of tradition and our heritage? Then we moved to store design. Clearly we have had to streamline store design to gain efficiencies of scale and to make sure we had the ROI on sales to investment ratios that would satisfy the financial side of our business. However, one of the results has been stores that no longer have the soul of the past and reflect a chain of stores vs. the warm feeling of a neighborhood store. Some people even call our stores sterile, cookie cutter, no longer reflecting the passion our partners feel about our coffee. In fact, I am not sure people today even know we are roasting coffee. You certainly can't get the message from being in our stores. The merchandise, more art than science, is far removed from being the merchant that I believe we can be and certainly at a minimum should support the foundation of our coffee heritage. Some stores don't have coffee grinders, French presses from Bodum, or even coffee filters.

Now that I have provided you with a list of some of the underlying issues that I believe we need to solve, let me say at the outset that we have all been part of these decisions. I take full responsibility myself, but we desperately need to look into the mirror and realize it's time to get back to the core and make the changes necessary to evoke the heritage, the tradition, and the passion that we all have for the true Starbucks experience. While the current state of affairs for the most part is self induced, that has lead to competitors of all kinds, small and large coffee companies, fast food operators, and mom and pops, to position themselves in a way that creates awareness, trial and loyalty of people who previously have been Starbucks customers. This must be eradicated.

I have said for 20 years that our success is not an entitlement and now it's proving to be a reality. Let's be smarter about how we are spending our time, money and resources. Let's get back to the core. Push for innovation and do the things necessary to once again differentiate Starbucks from all others. We source and buy the highest quality coffee. We have built the most trusted brand in coffee in the world, and we have an enormous responsibility to both the people who have come before us and the 150,000 partners and their families who are relying on our stewardship.

Finally, I would like to acknowledge all that you do for Starbucks. Without your passion and commitment, we would not be where we are today.

Onward…

 

 

Posted Feb 26 2007, 09:43 PM by Mark Ritson with no comments

Citi's New Brand Architecture

Ever since the mega merger with Travelers - Citigroup has been gradually evolving its brand architecture. The latest moves have just been announced.

 

 

Citigroup Announces Unified, Global Brand Identity Under "Citi" Name

Citigroup Inc.
(WebWire) 2/13/2007 1:55:43 PM

  Related Topics  
  • Advertising/Marketing  
  • Banking/Financial Services  
  • Business Announcements  
  • Financial Markets  

Underscores Commitment to Unified Company to Serve Clients and Deliver Shareholder Value

Definitive Agreement to Sell "Umbrella" to The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc.

February 13, 2007 - New York – Citigroup today announced a corporate branding change that unites its businesses under the well-known "Citi" name and its recognizable red arc design. This decision underscores the company’s commitment to bring its businesses together to serve clients worldwide.

"Our unified brand represents the promise to serve our clients as one company, as one Citi," said Charles Prince, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. "It also speaks to our exciting future as a highly connected, responsive, and profitable global leader in financial services."

"Citi is already among the most recognized and respected brands in global financial services. Our extensive global research and analysis also confirmed Citi is a highly effective brand across many languages, markets, and technology platforms. It is how most of our clients think about us already," Prince said. "Now, through a unified brand, we will leverage this symbol to represent our commitment to providing our clients with best-in-class advice, products and service."

The company also announced that it will sell to The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc. the trademark red umbrella that a legacy company acquired with its purchase of Travelers in 1993. The sale is conditioned upon Hart-Scott-Rodino approval, and is expected to close in March. Net proceeds from the sale of the umbrella will offset the future costs of implementing the unified brand.

"Our research continued to show that the trademark red umbrella was more connected with insurance, specifically St. Paul Travelers," continued Mr. Prince. "We are pleased to have entered into this agreement."

Beginning in the second quarter of this year, the following businesses will begin using a silver Citi with the red arc logo: corporate and investment banking will use the brand name Citi; wealth management will use the brand names Citi Smith Barney, Citi Investment Research and Citi Private Bank; and alternative investments will use the brand name Citi Alternative Investments. A list of Citi logos is attached.

Citi’s global consumer businesses, including the Citibank branch network, will maintain the signature blue Citi with the red arc brand name and signage. Also, there are no plans at this time to change the Banamex brand in Mexico. Primerica will also maintain its brand name, but it will use a new logo without the red umbrella.

While the company will do business as Citi, its legal name will remain Citigroup Inc. In addition, the names of its various affiliated legal entities will not change.

# # #

Citi

Citi, the leading global financial services company, has some 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 100 countries, providing consumers, corporations, governments and institutions with a broad range of financial products and services, including consumer banking and credit, corporate and investment banking, securities brokerage, and wealth management. Major brand names under the trademark red arc include: Citibank, CitiFinancial, Primerica, Citi Smith Barney and Banamex. Additional information may be found at www.citigroup.com or www.citi.com.

Certain statements in this document are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors. More information about these factors is contained in Citigroup’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Related Links

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Financial Services
Folding Citi's Umbrella
Liz Moyer, 02.13.07, 2:15 PM ET
 
 

Analysts criticize its strategic direction. A senior executive recently was assigned to cut costs out of a bloated infrastructure. Questions linger over ties between one of its former top executives and an anchor for CNBC.What does Citigroup (nyse: C - news - people ) do? It decides to drop "group" from its name and sell its red umbrella logo back to Travelers.That ought to fix things, right? Its new, pithy brand name, Citi, "speaks to our exciting future as a highly concentrated, responsive and profitable global leader in financial services," said Chief Executive Charles Prince in a statement Tuesday announcing the plan.If only it were that easy. This isn't the first time Citi has "rebranded" its global businesses, and it likely will not be the last. But the move marks a further departure from the old guard, led by Sanford I. Weill, who built the company from its origins as a troubled Baltimore commercial lender in the 1980s. Weill was proud of the Travelers umbrella logo, and had it emblazoned on just about everything including his own neckties. While still at Travelers, Weill bought Salomon Brothers in 1997 and merged it into his Smith Barney brokerage division. Corporate and investment bankers from Salomon Smith Barney continued to use the red umbrella after the 1998 merger of Travelers and Citicorp. It helped to differentiate them from the retail bankers who rolled coins in branches.That tension between the corporate and retail side, long present (and certainly not unique to Citi) may have been Prince's reason for the name change.Nobody outside the company refers to it as anything other than Citi, anyway. The name change appears to be intended to motivate employees to act more as one team. This is an offshoot of a project Prince initiated two years ago, when he set out to create one culture and one set of corporate values after Citi was beset with a series of embarrassing missteps, one of which got its private bank kicked out of Japan.But cosmetic changes to the brand won't solve deeper issues at Citi--namely a cost base that is growing faster than the rate of revenue growth. In December, Prince unveiled a cost-cutting plan led by investment banking head Robert Druskin. The company hasn't revealed details, but analysts have said it could result in a substantial restructuring charge. Some analysts have called for a break up of the company, saying its corporate and investment bank, its brokerage and its consumer lending operations are worth more apart than they are together.Then there was the management shakeup. Last month, Sallie Krawcheck, the chief financial officer, was moved aside to head the wealth management division, whose former head, Todd Thomson, left abruptly after questions about his corporate spending and his close ties to CNBC anchor Maria Bartiromo. (See: Dennis Kneale, " The Real Mess Behind Mariagate.")As part of Tuesday's announced changes, Citi is selling that red umbrella logo it inherited from Travelers Group back to Travelers. (The company, now known as St. Paul Travelers, is changing its name back to Travelers, too). Proceeds from the sale of the umbrella logo, which were undisclosed, will pay for the cost of taking "group" and the umbrella off Citi's documents and assorted property.Landor Associates, a New York firm that specializes in corporate branding, consulted with Citi on the brand change.In research, the red umbrella still resonated more with the legacy insurance operations, which Citi has long-since shed. The sale of the logo is expected to be completed by the end of March.Branding has been a hot topic lately. Last week, Ford Motor (nyse: F - news - people ) announced plans to rebrand several of its models to its popular Taurus brand. Cingular, the wireless company, recently announced plans to change its name to AT&T.Allen Adamson, a managing director at Landor, wrote on his blog this week, "The real challenge will be re-imbuing the names in question with positive associations--a difficult trench to climb out of for any brand." 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

January 15, 2007

Just ‘Citi’ as the Brand, and a Folded Umbrella

By ERIC DASH

Citigroup, the global banking giant, is shrinking — but only its name. Executives are prepared to rebrand the company "Citi" and to fold up its familiar red umbrella and instead use a logo with a stylized arc above the name. The new name and look, which follows a 14-month review of the bank's brand, will be presented to the Citigroup board this week, according to several executives close to the process. No final decision has been made and it could still undergo some minor changes. "We continue to work on our branding effort and will announce our decisions when it is completed," a spokeswoman, Leah Johnson, said. If adopted, the revised Citi brand and logo will be used at nearly all the vast financial services company's businesses, including retail branches and its investment bank concentrated in the New York area, and showcased around the world.The design is similar to the "citi" logo that now appears on much of its consumer advertising, office buildings and credit cards. A rollout could begin as early as next month.The plan to unify Citigroup's businesses under a new, single brand is part of an ambitious campaign by the chairman and chief executive, Charles O. Prince III, to better integrate the bank's sprawling parts after years of acquisitions — a strategy investors are still waiting to see pay off. Symbolically, it also marks the end of an era. Just as a new name became one of the signatures of a transformative deal by the former chairman, Sanford I. Weill, a more coherent brand strategy signals Mr. Prince's plans to shift the focus of a company sometimes seen as a deal machine to one largely powered by internal and international growth. The brand makeover comes out of the playbook of other big companies. Apple Computer, for example, last week shortened its name to Apple emphasize its broader ambitions for other technologies, like the new iPhone. Several years ago, Morgan Stanley ditched the suffix of Dean Witter, and Federal Express became just FedEx.By shedding the suffix "group" as well as the red umbrella, Mr. Prince is severing the bank's most tangible ties to Mr. Weill, Citigroup's patriarch, who made the old Travelers Group logo a key term of that company's landmark 1998 merger with Citicorp and who is rarely seen without a small umbrella pin affixed to his lapel.Over two decades under Mr. Weill, Commercial Credit turned into the Travelers Group, which morphed into Citigroup — while many of its operating businesses like the retail operations, Citibank, and the brokerage arm, Smith Barney, adopted their own looks and retained their old names. Over the last few years, Citigroup's consumer businesses took on the "citi" prefix to become CitiBank or CitiMortgage without an overarching plan or a formal approval process. Its card business, which spends the largest amount on advertising, became known as Citi. The result, in the eyes of some, was a mishmash of logos and titles that appeared disconnected, while many Wall Street clients, Main Street customers and even Citigroup employees simply referred to the different parts of the conglomerate as Citi. Now, Mr. Prince hopes to unify the company under one global name at a time he is urging more cooperation between the businesses. He also hopes to achieve some small cost savings on media spending, which totaled $623 million in 2005, according to TNS Media Intelligence.Most of the operating businesses are expected to adopt the "Citi" prefix, but each will use a different color arc to maintain a distinct look. Citi's corporate and investment bank will feature a black arc; its wealth management division will use a red arc, and its consumer businesses, a blue arc. Banamex, its Mexican retail bank, and Smith Barney are expected to retain the old names. Since October 2005, a panel of senior Citigroup business leaders and marketing executives has been evaluating the future of the brand. At the time, Mr. Prince said he believed that the company could benefit from "a more coordinated approach" to dealing with "one of our most important assets."The company hired Landor Associates, a brand-consulting firm owned by the WPP Group, and put Ajay Banga, a co-head of its consumer businesses, who helped build PepsiCo's Pizza Hut and KFC franchises in India, in charge of the review. Still, many in the company were divided. Top investment bank executives, some of whom had been campaigning for the resurrection of the Salomon Brothers name, initially thought that the adoption of the consumer brand's Citi logo would cheapen their image. Smith Barney executives expressed similar concerns. By late fall, when Citigroup announced that it would call the New York Mets' new stadium, CitiField, there was a growing consensus in favor of the new look. Plans were not final, however, until mid-December. At the same time, other Citigroup managers were deeply divided over the fate of the red umbrella.In the end, however, Citigroup's brand committee decided to drop the 137-year-old symbol, which has adorned the bank's pitch books, buildings and business cards — as well as some executive attire. It has also been a source of local controversy. In 1997, a TriBeCa community association petitioned to have the neon umbrella removed from Travelers' 39-story headquarters building at 388 Greenwich Street, now home to its investment bank. The New York City Buildings Department said it was a logo, not a sign, and it stayed after the company agreed to dim its lights overnight and turn it off for four hours after sunset.Now it appears that the umbrella will be folded up altogether. Citigroup executives said that outside marketing research suggested that the umbrella had no resonance for bank customers in the United States, especially since the Travelers insurance businesses had been spin off. Outside the country, a bank executive said, the symbol is associated with insurance as well as with bad luck in certain Asian countries.Whether or not Citigroup retains the rights, or sells it to another company, remains a question. It is also unclear what will happen to the 16-foot, 5,300 steel umbrella that sits outside the investment bank in Lower Manhattan. Of course, Mr. Prince may already have a place to display it in mind. Several months ago, he half-jokingly suggested to Mr. Weill that "if it ever does happen, that he is going to have to take the umbrella in front of our office downtown and move it out to my home in Greenwich," Mr. Weill recalled in an interview last fall.

 

Posted Feb 26 2007, 09:34 PM by Mark Ritson with no comments
Filed under:

Brands that UNDERinvest in Advertising

Its kind of like the anti-IPA Awards. All the big brands that dominate their market, not depsite, but apparently because of an inherent focus away from big ad spending.

In the Uk its the Pret a Manger effect. Big brands that do such a good job of building brand they do not need to spend much if anything on advertising.

In Prets case it simply because they do such a good job in the old fashioned brand building space - people, products, service, environment.

In all the hullabaloo about M&S discovering advertising last year (and boy did they discover it) there are still a large number of very BIG brands that eschew advertising in favour of other brand building approaches. They tend to be discount players like Ryanair and Aldi - who see BIG advertising as inconsistent with their brand. Hell, Aldi don't even have a marketing department let alone any ads.

Tesco is another notable example. Big Brand, small media budget.

 

In the US the poster boy for this kind of ad-light brand building approach is Starbucks. See 2006 spend data in the US here...

 

 

Photo

 

 

Posted Feb 26 2007, 09:29 PM by Mark Ritson with no comments

And then there were three... Gap Now Really in FreeFall

Gap has announced the closure of its new women's brand Forth & Towne. Here is a Business Week article on its launch which focuses on how the store was creating a branded experience. Then here is an FT piece on F&T's demise. Looks like The Gap is slimming down ready for advances from Private Equity.

 

SEPTEMBER 20, 2005

Forth & Towne: The Store's the Thing

At Gap's new women's apparel chain, architectural design -- notably the dressing room's central placement -- is defining what the new brand is



On a recent Saturday afternoon at the Palisades Mall in Nyack, N.Y., Forth & Towne's "style consultants" buzzed about, handing out bottled water and trying to help shoppers get comfortable in a place that wasn't even listed on the mall directory yet. This store -- as well as four others, in the Chicago area -- glows in a way that befits its price point, which is about even with Banana Republic's. Art-deco-looking furniture recalls the golden age of department stores, and sketches of the collection bring a sense of provenance to a brand new brand.

GETTING OUT TO SHOP.  But from any angle, the store is dominated by an illuminated circular wall topped by stainless steel- and crystal-beaded curtains and sculpted with niches filled with mannequins. Within its beaded pleats is the elaborately decorated "fitting salon," which is the centerpiece of the store experience -- and, by extension, the Forth & Towne brand itself.

"Why would you go to a store vs. shopping online? What's going to draw you out?" David Rockwell, Forth & Towne's architect, wondered recently, recalling his design process. "A lot of it is social interaction. We're in a world where there's more and more reason to stay at home. Forth & Towne is really about making a commitment to going out in the public realm."

And Rockwell is known for creating places that people want to be in. His designs for Nobu restaurants -- all seven locations in the U.S. -- transformed superb sushi into crowd-pleasing theater. He put the style in Starwood Hotel's high-style W brand with designs for two New York locations. And he often works in the theater, designing sets for Dirty Rotten Scoundrels and the Tony-winning Hairspray. What ties all his work together is a sense of celebration, of theatrical extravagance, that transforms going out into an event.

LIKE THE CLOCK TOWER.
  At Forth & Towne, the real stage is the fitting rooms, so his design literally pulls them to the center of the store. The narrow anonymous fitting room hallways are replaced by an inviting round room furnished like a little hotel lobby, with comfortable chairs and a "style table" laid out with fashion magazines, fresh flowers, and water bottles.

Twelve fitting rooms, each with its own unique wallpaper, surround the central space. The concept is to create a place that encourages interaction with friends, other shoppers, men-in-tow, and Forth & Towne's "style consultants." Like the clock tower in a town square or the large chandelier in a department store, the fitting salon marks the symbolic and celebratory center of their place.

In the absence of an existing brand identity, Rockwell and his client are turning on its head the conventional wisdom that a retail environment reflects and enhances its brand. Instead, the Forth & Towne architecture defines the brand -- and both are squarely aimed at improving the shopping experience. 

18 months later......

 

 

Gap to abandon new fourth brand

By Jonathan Birchall
Updated: 3:11 p.m. ET Feb. 26, 2007

Gap, the US troubled clothing retailer, is to close down a fledgling line of stores aimed at older women, in a change of strategic direction following the depature last month of Paul Pressler, its former chief executive.

The move comes amid speculation that Gap's management might consider the sale of all or part of the company, following two years of poor sales at its Gap and Old Navy brands.

The company's Forth & Towne stores, unveiled just 18 months ago, had sought to focus on baby-boomer women aged 35 and over, who represent an increasingly important segment of the US clothing market.

Gap said that despite an encouraging start "a thorough analysis revealed the concept was not demonstrating enough potential to deliver an acceptable long-term return on investment".

It will take a $40m pre-tax charge in its first and second quarters due to the closure of the brand's 19 existing stores, most of which opened just last autumn.

The new brand was a central element in the company's growth strategy under Mr Pressler, who has now been replaced as interim president and CEO by Bob Fisher, the son of Gap's founders.

While the stores represented a new attempt to focus on a well-defined market segment, they also took adopted a merchandising strategy that left some customers confused, with four different fashion "selections" in each store, that were supposed to target different life-styles.

Todd Slater, analyst at Lazard Capital Markets, welcomed the move, saying the brand "never gained much traction, suffered from fit, style, and image problems, and became a big distraction".

Mr Fisher described the experience with the format as "an illustration of the innovative risks you need to take in our business" and added that Gap wanted to "focus our efforts on stabilising the existing businesses".

Forth & Towne was developed and headed by Gary Muto, a company veteran who was formerly president of the Gap brand, before being moved to the project by Mr Pressler.

The decision is the latest in a series of changes made since Mr Fisher took over from Mr Pressler, including replacing Cynthia Harriss as president of the Gap brand with Marka Hansen, formerly president of the more successful Banana Republic stores.

Gap subsequently announced the departure of Charlotte Neuville, the head designer hired by the Gap brand in 2005 as part of a bid to reverse falling sales.

Some analysts have argued that the moves undertaken since Mr Pressler left, and ahead of the naming of a new CEO, indicate that the members of the Fisher family, who control over 30 per cent of Gap's shares, are committed to turning Gap around, rather than a sale.

Analysts at Merrill Lynch recently argued that there was only a 25 per cent chance of a leveraged buy-out of the company, noting that the Fishers had continued to back the previous management through several failed turnaround bids.

Gap's shares were largely unchanged by the news, trading at $19.71 at lunchtime in New York.

Posted Feb 26 2007, 09:24 PM by Mark Ritson with no comments

Moss, Borkowski et al

Response from Mark Borkowski, PR Genius, to my Kate Moss article last year pointing out that far from being "finished" the model actually had a record year in 2006.

 

ALL TIME "NODDY" HIGH!

I have done my 125th interview on Kate Moss, this time for an Australian News Network. The ups and downs of Kate Moss's life have been a rollercoaster ride. This week an article in a design magazine dug out one of my original quotes on the Kate Moss ferago, when the story originally broke.

http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/design/article/603548/mark-ritson-branding-hit-scandal-it/

The continuing need for 24/7 news quotes from pundits like myself and Max Clifford, only illustrates that you can comment on a situation as it happens, and as you see fit to comment at the time.

However, not representing the person, you cannot see the bigger picture and sometimes soundbites can fly back like a boomerang and smack you in the face.

I have always used my "get out of jail free card" saying that things are likely to change, but news organisations or newspapers always choose to fillet the caveat. It's clear that in the initial stages of the PR meltdown, brands did have to distance themselves from Moss. Those brands that needed an edge embraced her and by doing so, she became rehabilitated and her new existence was forged.

Make no mistakes; in any celebrity career, every day has a sunrise and a sunset and whether it's a red sky in the morning or at night, it's usually governed by the ongoing conduct of the individual to generate safe column inches.

Posted by Mark Borkowski on November 20

 

 

Original story...

 

Mark Ritson on branding: Hit by scandal? Make the most of it

Marketing 08-Nov-06

Bryan Ferry paused, just for a second, and the audience at the Victoria & Albert Museum thrilled.

No stranger to beautiful women, Ferry was on stage to announce who had
won Model of the Year at the British Fashion Awards. The crowd had a
clear favourite and the usually detached atmosphere suddenly acquired a

brief flash of anticipation. Finally Ferry smiled and two words fell
languidly from his mouth into the huge room: Kate Moss.

 

Moss did not accept the award in person. Instead, Vivienne Westwood
returned to the stage to accept it in her honour. Despite rumours that
Moss would appear to claim her prize, no one in the fashion cognoscenti
expected her to appear. Kate keeps quiet.

A little over a year ago, things were very different for the British
supermodel. That Daily Mirror front page, featuring Moss apparently
engaged in a cocaine binge, had been flashed all over the world. During
the painful PR week that followed, her major contracts with brands
including H&M, Chanel and Gloria Vanderbilt were abruptly and very
publicly ended or reviewed. Even Burberry was forced to unceremoniously
dump her image from its flagship stores.

The media were quick to punish and predict her demise. The New York
Times had Moss in 'professional freefall', The Times had her future
'hanging in the balance', while The Mirror boldly declared her career
over. Max Clifford announced that Moss was 'coming to the end of her
career', while that other PR uber-commentator, Mark Borkowski, predicted
that Moss would be 'crucified' and declared that she had 'as much
glamour as a disinfected bargepole'.

Things did not quite work out that way. The past 12 months have been
Moss' most successful in her 15-year career. Aside from last week's
award, she was also voted Best Dressed Woman by Glamour and given a
prestigious award for Fashion Influence in the US.

Her popularity with the public appears equally strong. Burberry reported
'extraordinary' demand for the £750 handbag Moss carries in its
latest ads, while Superdrug saw sales of its £2.99 charity bag
increase tenfold after the model was spotted with one.

Then there is the work. Since the scandal broke, Moss has picked up
contracts for Nikon, Virgin Mobile, Top Shop, Burberry, Stella
McCartney, Dior, Versace, Agent Provocateur, Louis Vuitton and her
original patron, Calvin Klein. Fashion insiders estimate she has
quadrupled her annual income to about £30m this year.

Moss is a very private woman, but 'Kate Moss the model' is a brand. And,
like any brand, we must understand her brand equity to correctly
diagnose her future success or failure.

One of the originators of the 'heroin chic' look when she graced the
cover of The Face in 1990, Moss caused further scandal when she posed
nude for Calvin Klein's Obsession in 1993. For the past 10 years her
personal life has continually featured in the papers and she is engaged
to a drug-addled pop star. She is a brand built on glamour, but also
danger and scandal.

This is the root of her success - Paris Vogue admitted as much when it
put Moss on its cover last Autumn. Burberry originally selected her to
represent the brand for exactly the same reason. She was the 'bad girl'
to contrast with its other British face, the aristocratic Stella
Tennant.

Moss' tabloid scandal was not career-ending, but career-extending. Look
at the other models of her generation: the Turlingtons and Schiffers are
part of fashion history. Rich husbands and charity campaigns are their
lot.

At 32, Moss is an unparalleled, contemporary success because she is
different and consistent, and because she is a brand.

30 SECONDS ON ... KATE MOSS

- After allegations of her cocaine use broke in September 2005, Moss was
dropped by H&M, Chanel and Burberry, reportedly losing £4m in
earnings.

- Chanel said it would not renew her £750,000-a-year contract,
replacing her with actress Keira Knightley as the face of fragrance Coco
Mademoiselle in a deal believed to be worth £1m.

- Burberry said it was 'saddened by her circumstances' and would not
extend her contract past October 2005, but subsequently decided to renew
the deal after all.

- Moss has secured several deals this year, including a £1.5m
contract to advertise Nikon cameras, a £1.2m tie-up with Virgin
Mobile and a £1m Stella McCartney contract.

- She is also set to return as the face of Calvin Klein Jeans, in a deal
worth a reported £500,000.

- Moss' earnings for the current financial

 

Posted Feb 26 2007, 12:00 PM by Mark Ritson with no comments
Filed under:

Non-Traditional vs Traditional Marketing Communication?

Traditional or Non-Traditional communication?

It's the classic question that we seem to always face. So which tools are which? It's actually a question of when.

I was on a panel of experts last week at a big conference in Asia.

The conference dinner the night before had been far too vigorous and an old friend from the drinks industry had been updating me on Asian drinking alternatives. It was now the morning after the night before and I was nursing the mother of all hangovers. I found myself gulping down water, wincing every time a flashbulb went off, and looking out into a sea of marketers hoping desperately that nobody would ask me anything tricky.

 

Which was when a voice from the darkness asked 'What are the traditional communication tools and what are the non-traditional ones?' I gulped. This was actually quite an interesting question and, as with most interesting questions about marketing, the answer was: 'It depends'.

In the olden days the answer was simple. Anything above-the-line - advertising - was deemed to be the traditional communication tool for building brands. The less traditional, and somewhat less glamorous tools, such as direct marketing and sales promotions, were the alternative approaches. Below-the-line did not just refer to the method of commission for these alternative methods, it was also a way of positioning them as sub-standard and unconventional compared with the gold standard of advertising.

Things changed in the 80s. Once-frowned-upon tools such as direct mail and sales promotions became increasingly accepted as advertising's equivalent and often its superior. A proven ability to deliver big ROI and the emerging agency expertise in these approaches meant these tools became traditional in every sense of the word.

Clutter had begun to emerge as a key problem for marketers and the new non-traditional tools were those freshly created by marketers to get around or through the cluttered communication landscape. Ambient methods such as ads above the urinals in toilets and infomercials became all the rage.

Then came the internet. Almost overnight, non-traditional meant anything online. First it was clunky web pages, then banner ads, then search optimisation, then blogs. Most marketers who experienced the turn of the century drew a distinction between the traditional offline world and the alternative tools associated with online communications.

But with internet spend now featuring heavily in most companies' marketing budgets, it is hard to continue to equate online marketing as an alternative approach any more. Flick through the average brand manager's laptop these days and search statistics are just as likely to appear as BARB or Acorn data. Indeed, with the ever-growing influence of Google's auctioning approach as a method for buying traditional media as well as search, it is clear that the online world is becoming the epicentre of most marketing communications.

The past few years have seen the emergence of touchpoints as the central model for marketing communication. Gone is the archaic notion that there is a period of marketing communication and then the sale, followed by consumption. Instead, all these stages are charted on a journey that begins with information search and ends when the consumer has disposed of the product. The impact of touchpoints has been to render all attempts to separate traditional from non-traditional media redundant. Everything can communicate brand equity and drive customer satisfaction, and everything from websites and sales people to store experience and packaging is included. We have finally reached the omega of marketing media: everything is alternative, everything is traditional.

I'd love to tell you that this was my answer to the question at the conference. Alas, my hangover dictated that the best I could come up with was 'Traditional is advertising and a bit of DM. Non-traditional is ... er ... Google and product placement.'

Posted Feb 24 2007, 01:26 AM by Mark Ritson with no comments

Microsoft Vista Launch

$500 million buys you a lot of launch - but in the case of Microsoft Vista the launch appears to have disappeared without trace. Why?

It should have been the biggest launch of 2007.

Abseiling acrobats formed a 'human billboard' high above Manhattan, fireworks illuminated the Grande Arche at La Defense in Paris, dancers performed all around the Taj Mahal and Bill Gates was on hand at the British Library for the UK launch - Microsoft Vista was upon us.

 

Everything associated with it was big. It was a 36-hour event that marked the start of a $500m (£257m) marketing investment, designed to generate more than 6bn global impressions and sales that will eventually exceed $70bn (£36bn). Yet for all the scale and budget of its launch, the impact of Microsoft Vista has been, well, small.

Those with good memories will remember the big headlines and long queues that greeted the introduction of Windows 95 some 12 years ago. Vista was a very different story; there was distinct indifference from the world's media.

According to John Bentz, senior vice-president at Waggener Edstrom, one of Microsoft's key PR agencies, the goal of the campaign was to create a 'visceral experience'. He said: 'We wanted it to drive broadcast attention, and to do that we had to do something significantly bold and daring.'

Despite this big-launch talk, two weeks later, Vista seems to have all but disappeared. Most of the trade press has remained singularly unimpressed, while the popular press seemed only mildly interested in Microsoft's attempts to generate buzz on launch day.

Then there was the crap slogan. 'The wow starts now'. We all know that marketing is more than a snappy strapline, but rarely in the brave field of marketing has so much been invested in so little. If you believe all the guff from Microsoft, the Vista launch has been years in the planning. If this is what years of planning generates, God help Microsoft if it ever has to go to market within months.

The big question is not whether the Vista launch was a major disappointment, but why it had such a small impact, given the funds, scale and time ploughed into it.

One possible explanation is that Vista is not as important to Microsoft as we might be led to believe. Despite the claims of chief executive Steve Ballmer that this was the biggest and most important launch in the company's history, the reality may be that a bigger launch is on the horizon. Vista is arriving two years late, which could mean it will soon be eclipsed by a more advanced Microsoft operating system. Rumours are already circulating about a new offering, codenamed 'Vienna', which, according to several Microsoft contacts, could launch as soon as 2009.

Another possible reason for the poor performance of the Vista launch might be the size of the budget - it may have been too big.

When marketers get too much to spend, they get lazy, big and ineffective. They start laying out for hugely expensive and ineffective executions and pay little or no attention to positioning or marketing return on investment. Over-investment in marketing is a relatively rare occurrence, but when it happens, the end result is the same as the much more commonly occurring scenario of under-investment.

Perhaps the most intriguing explanation for Vista's launch failure is a much broader one. In contrast with 1995, we are living in an inherently interactive, multi-vocal and polysemous world. The days of the big global launch may be over. This is the era of YouTube, blogging and co-creativity. The great irony of Vista is that the interactivity and connectivity it was designed to offer its users might also explain its apparently very big, but actually very small, launch.

Posted Feb 16 2007, 02:08 AM by Mark Ritson with no comments
Filed under:

Tiffany

Tiffany are doubly rare. An American luxury brand. And one that knows what it is doing. A great illustration of why marketing and sales are often very different things.

Tiffany launched the 'Return to Tiffany' collection in 1997.

The accessibly priced silver jewellery was so named because every piece carried the 'return' message alongside a prominent Tiffany & Co logo. The collection, headlined by a large silver charm bracelet priced $110, sold fantastically well.

Over the next five years, thanks in no small part to this collection, sales at Tiffany rose by two-thirds. The financial markets were impressed and the company's share price rocketed. By 2002, however, a flaw was growing deep in the heart of the Tiffany brand. The company was selling too much of the wrong product to the wrong people.

At this point that the Tiffany story could go in one of two directions. If the firm was being run by the average British chief executive, with no training, experience or appreciation for brand equity, the likely response would be to open a few more stores, set some aggressive sales targets and gradually drive the brand towards disaster. But Tiffany was led by Mike Kowalski, the kind of chief executive we rarely encounter in the UK. Prior to assuming the role in 1999, Kowalski spent five years heading Tiffany's marketing. So he was experienced enough to recognise that Tiffany's explosive sales success masked bigger, long-term problems. His diagnosis: the large number of silver customers represented a fundamental threat - not just to the business, but to the core franchise.

Kowalski looked beyond the sales figures and examined brand equity. Using extensive customer research, his team began to identity the precarious position Tiffany was now in. High-end customers were turning away from a brand that a growing number of them now perceived as targeting younger, less exclusive customers. The research also revealed that Tiffany's brand associations were switching from high-end luxury to affordable silver accessories. It was also being deluged with young female customers at weekends and its small, private boutiques and attentive staff struggled to cope with this bigger but less valuable clientele. It became standard practice to issue customers with a beeper on entry to page them when a sales associate became available. Tiffany's traditional customer base began to defect and brand equity was eroding.

In 2002, armed with the results of his research, Kowalski raised the prices on all of its most accessible collections, including 'Return to Tiffany'. The increase was not a response to rising costs or a desire for higher margins. It was a marketing decision intended purely to reduce sales. This sounds like madness if you are a salesperson. But if you understand brand, and the difference between marketing and sales, it makes perfect strategic sense.

Problematically, the price rises had no discernible impact on sales. So in 2003 and again in 2004, Tiffany drove prices even higher. Finally, with prices up by more than 30%, Kowalski achieved his goal: sales of jewellery under $500 began to decline. Profits took a hit and many analysts questioned the logic of the price increases. Tiffany's share price plunged in 2004.

It has taken more than two years, but Tiffany is now back on track. New high-end jewellery ranges and VIP invitations to high-value customers are gradually restoring luxury and exclusivity to the brand. Brand equity has been restored and the share price has begun to revive.

Mike Kowalski exemplifies all the qualities of a brand-centric chief executive. Take the long-term view: it's better to have 20% of the market forever than 60% for five years. Look at customer research as well as sales figures - who is buying and why? Don't be afraid to disappoint shareholders in the short term; they don't understand brand-building - that's why they are investors not marketers. Most important, prioritise brand equity over everything else. Always.

Posted Feb 01 2007, 02:24 AM by Mark Ritson with no comments
Page 1 of 1 (12 items)
 

ADVERTISEMENT