Rich Media - All Comments

Women in rock « NCALMedia

Women in rock « NCALMedia — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:32:12 GMT

Pingback from Women in rock « NCALMedia

re: Free economics work, as long as we're willing to pay

Robert Brett — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:46:01 GMT

"money makes the world go 'round"

Always has...always will.

When something is 'sold as free, you [or somebody] is paying for it elsewhere.

re: Free economics work, as long as we're willing to pay

AmarjitSingh Kullar — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:12:03 GMT

Maybe I want to read this book when I get time

Amarjit Singh Kullar

www.amarjitsinghkullar.info

re: Free economics work, as long as we're willing to pay

Martin Thomas — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:04:39 GMT

The media industry needs to be wary of shooting the messenger when it criticises Anderson's new book. He is simply dramatising the challenge faced by every business in the media and entertainment industries. Although the prognosis is bleak for many media businesses, new economic models will emerge.

The music industry has faced a similar challenge for the past few years and appears to have been reasonably successful in refocusing investment on live events and merchandising to compensate for a loss of revenue from traditional music sales.

re: Can Microsoft's Bing take on the might of Google?

Ben Risk — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:49:05 GMT

don't be ridiculous! Google it!

Twitted by RichSutcliffe

Twitted by RichSutcliffe — Mon, 04 May 2009 11:32:58 GMT

Pingback from Twitted by RichSutcliffe

re: The media TweetSheet - is your name down?

Jon Clarke — Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:46:17 GMT

Lots of the main UK media people can be found on this list, with more adding themselves as time goes by. www.mediastarz.co.uk/.../twitterchinwagstarz

We're following you too Rich

re: The media TweetSheet - is your name down?

Rich Sutcliffe — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:30:58 GMT

Sorry Mel, given how many people are already following you I presumed the whole of media land was already tracking your every move!

re: The media TweetSheet - is your name down?

Mel Carson — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:24:23 GMT

What about your stable of faithful bloggers Rich? http://Twitter.com/MelCarson :-)

re: The media TweetSheet - is your name down?

Steve Barrett — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:12:49 GMT

OK, you've shamed me into it. I'm now at: www.twitter.com/spikebarrett (Steve had already gone...)

re: The media TweetSheet - is your name down?

Alastair Duncan — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:37:48 GMT

@AlastairDuncan good to see another stokey twitterer

re: iPhone, therefore I am

Joff Outlaw — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:17:09 GMT

I threw mine in the river in a rash moment because text messaging is too fiddly, particularly at 1 am with partial eyesight.

I've got a basic nokia now - it's great - it texts and calls - everything else can wait until I am at work or home.

re: iPhone, therefore I am

Arif Durrani — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:29:10 GMT

how's the mediaweek site fixed for mobile?

re: iPhone, therefore I am

Rich Sutcliffe — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:41:31 GMT

I know what you mean about not wanting the experience to be interrupted by ads, but that's not necessarily the way the brands should reach out. For example, The Telegraph is the only broadsheet on there with a news app, so I read it, Last.fm, Xfm, Shazam ditto. They're not necessarily punting money at mobile banners, but they're still part of my iPhone experience whereas those who aren't there are missing out.

re: iPhone, therefore I am

Jack Wallington — Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:11:47 GMT

I've had mine since launch around 15 months ago and the novelty still hasn't worn off for me! That's either a good thing or a bad thing. Like you, I use my iPhone for a significant chunk of the day. I don't want that experience interrupted by ads, but there's definitely room for them. I still can't believe I have never seen an ad on mobile Facebook. What a waste.