Rich Media

June 2008 - Posts

You would think that Metallica would have learned their lesson. Take on the internet, and you will lose.

Having previously had their goatees burned when they waged war against peer-to-peer downloading sites, which ultimately lead to them achieving nothing other than being seen more as dinosaurs of rock rather than the monsters they had been, the poor, sensitive souls appear to have unwittingly landed themselves in hot water again.

The band has been forced to issue a statement on its website attempting to calm many thousands of angry young fans, who have been voicing their disbelief that Metallica representatives Q Prime attempted to have early reviews raving about their new album removed from music blogs, posted following an invite-only listening session of a yet-to-be-released album last week.

"Our response was "WHY?!!! Why take down mostly positive reviews of the new material and prevent people from getting psyched about the next record. . . that makes no sense to us!"" (sic) reads Metallica's post.

Why indeed? Surely a band as sensitive to customer care as Metallica have had to become can't have such misguided PRs that they thought that a discrete phone call to a web editor would go uncontested?

If a previously wounded blogosphere is talking you up, for God's sake don't shove a stick through the bars and poke it.

Related Links

http://metallica.com/index.asp?item=600942

http://www.thequietus.com/2008/06/metallica-and-reviews-for-all/

In the first of a regular look at what the right honourable member for Leigh is up to - not that this blog will solely deal with the DCMS, but we will keep a close eye on Whitehall - we find the Secretary of State in combative mood.

In the Media Week story Burnham spurns product placement, speaking at a Department for Culture Media and Sport Culture Convergence Think Tank seminar Burnham said that product placement in TV shows would "contaminate our programmes".

"There are some lines that we should not cross - one of which is that you can buy the space between the programmes on commercial channels, but not the space within them," he argued.

It's an interesting point of view, but not one that seems to have gone down with well with the Media Week readers.

"The unintended consequence is to give a boost to Web shows, where product integration is not regulated and well-established," comments Colin Donald

"The more Andy Burnham uses this type of terminology the less credence he will have," writes Frank Zazza.

I appreciate his drive for purity and credibility, ITV for one could do with a bit of shine for its recently sullied reputation, but has Mr Burnham really taken into consideration the pressure commercial broadcasters are under? Is there not a middle ground where regulated product placement might allow commercial operators to invest more in and, therefore, improve their output without ‘contaminating' Corrie et al?

We are, as it happens, in the process of trying to tempt the Mr Burnham onto Media Week TV, at the moment. We very much hope he'll take us up on our offer so we can delve further into the media strategy of the DCMS.

Page 1 of 1 (2 items)

Search Community

 

About this blog

Rich Media
Media Week's digital editor Rich Sutcliffe looks at the worlds of digital, print and the grey areas in-between

Contributors

Rich Sutcliffe

Blogging for:

Rich Media

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 08 Jan 2009

Total Posts: 155

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndication

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT