For a any campaign, there is rarely a time when search shouldn’t be considered as part of the marketing mix. An exceptional mechanic at capitalising on demand and a worthy investment despite its weakness in terms of stimulating that initial engagement. Some may say that appearing against a generic search result is beneficial and while I give that argument credence it is rarely the motivating factor in investment choices.
So we are all agreed, spend money on search. Now the tricky bit – the relationship of investment and results between SEO and PPC. Why do clients confidently and happily spend many hundreds of thousands on PPC however balk at the prospect of paying five figures for an annual SEO retainer ? Naturally the focus of a search budget will vary for a number of reasons - vertical, seasonality, competitive set, business objectives your current position and learning, internal resource, I could keep going for some time however what’s really starting to wind me up is the energy and funds going into the source of 15% of the traffic while the remaining 85% is just “assumed”.
More specifically SEO still seems to be falling between the cracks. It still doesn’t have a comfortable home, its not marketing, its not IT. As a result of this I have recently had the following exchange
“We cant do SEO someone, forgot to put a line in a budget”
“don’t panic” was my retort “lets recut the PPC budget and reinvest in SEO”
eery silence with a look that suggested I’d just asked him to give me his first born.
So my question to you, all 15 of my readers is, what have I missed ? Why on earth wouldn’t you reduce reliance on PPC to invest in organic search ?