Blogs

Reinventing marketing

Comments: 3
Rating:
 

In my previous post, I suggested that marketing - and marketers - are forever at war with themselves over two fundamentally opposed interpretations of what good marketing looks like. 

 

Proposition 1: good marketing means identifying and meeting customer needs profitably

Proposition 2: good marketing means changing consumer attitudes and behaviours in our favour

 

In practice, the split tends to take place when we move from 'the product' to 'its marketing'. When we are developing the product or service, our main concern is to identify and meet consumer needs, because we are much more likely to sell more that way. But when we are developing our marketing campaigns, our focus shifts to changing consumer attitudes and behaviours in our favour.

 

That's why, in general, consumers like and trust good products, and dislike and mistrust marketers and marketing. Products and services add value for consumers, but often their marketing doesn't.

 

That's a problem. A big problem.

 

It's the problem we have to address.

All Comments

  August 10, 2009

The alternative to ‘ stimulus-response ’ is to assume that, generally speaking, individuals buy and use

  October 13, 2009

Commenting on my last post on ‘stimulus-response’ Andrew Weir says: “In my humble view marketing should

  November 24, 2009

The quest for brand or customer ‘loyalty’ is one of a number of examples of what we could call faux marketing

To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT