Mobile Matters - All Comments

Concept: Location Based (LBS) / Geo Status Updates On Facebook & Twitter « Mobile Inc

Sun, 17 May 2009 02:17:07 GMT

Pingback from Concept: Location Based (LBS) / Geo Status Updates On Facebook & Twitter « Mobile Inc

Vodafone-Twitter deal is a teen winner « Media Quake

Vodafone-Twitter deal is a teen winner « Media Quake — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:17:54 GMT

Pingback from Vodafone-Twitter deal is a teen winner « Media Quake

re: Mobile search needs advertisers

Philip Buxton — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:10:13 GMT

Yep, strange given how fast they were onto the web. Thing is Google surpassed them so quickly there I wonder if they have enough money to invest in anything new (though this is of course what they should be doing) - particularly through classifieds-focused media owner-partnerships?

re: Mobile search needs advertisers

SEAN RUTTLEDGE — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:28:59 GMT

I'm pretty sure that at least for the immediate future the real opportunities in mobile advertsing are localised / locationbased opportunities that Yellow Pages & Thompson should have exploited a lot better a lot earlier

About the only effort I've seen fromtheseguys is "Find my nearest" which premiered on 3 about 5 years back and took 6 times longer to find anything than calling directory services

Mobile search needs advertisers « Media Quake

Mobile search needs advertisers « Media Quake — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:05:18 GMT

Pingback from Mobile search needs advertisers « Media Quake

New mobile FT site goes back to basics « Media Quake

New mobile FT site goes back to basics « Media Quake — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:17:50 GMT

Pingback from New mobile FT site goes back to basics « Media Quake

Brand v response - the false debate « Media Quake

Brand v response - the false debate « Media Quake — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:05:49 GMT

Pingback from Brand v response - the false debate « Media Quake

Mobile will have to take yet another ad break « Media Quake

Mobile will have to take yet another ad break « Media Quake — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:03:29 GMT

Pingback from Mobile will have to take yet another ad break « Media Quake

Mobile: now???s the time to buy « Media Quake

Mobile: now???s the time to buy « Media Quake — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:03:33 GMT

Pingback from Mobile: now???s the time to buy « Media Quake

Mobile: now’s the time to buy

Mobile Matters — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:58:12 GMT

In mobile, as in any other sector, a downturn – if you have the cash – is the best time to be buying

re: How will the mobile revolution be paid for?

Philip Buxton — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 11:35:30 GMT

Absolutely. The chief problem with web models is that they were offline models that have had to have been manipulated to fit (which is why they don't work that well). To take those already flawed models and re-hash them again for mobile is a bad case of commercial Chinese rumours!

re: How will the mobile revolution be paid for?

Alexander Fairfax — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:41:45 GMT

Concur!

Why bust our balls trying to thumb misfit models into misfit media? The agro that I’ve seen some businesses go through tying to squeeze premium content into ad-revenue models or other is none short of Herculanian, poor guys. More often than not, the product consumer value gets totally diluted and the trade relationships / remuneration weak / convoluted. The reason people worry about charging on mobile is because they’re migrating from web businesses that are a totally different animal. Danger of convergence…

How will the mobile revolution be paid for? « Media Quake

How will the mobile revolution be paid for? « Media Quake — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:21:26 GMT

Pingback from How will the mobile revolution be paid for? « Media Quake

Nielsen figures point to some answers « Media Quake

Nielsen figures point to some answers « Media Quake — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:24:28 GMT

Pingback from Nielsen figures point to some answers « Media Quake

Nielsen figures point to some answers

Mobile Matters — Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:21:05 GMT

We talked a while ago about how mobile usage – just like web usage - will be about services rather than