Mobile Matters

Philip Buxton, former editor of Revolution and digital media consultant, offers insights on the trends and realities of mobile for the media industry

Reports on Carling’s iPint have so far been overflowing (no pun intended) with praise. But, while the campaign brilliantly demonstrates how execution of ideas can be utterly tied into the medium (including device) on which it is viewed/used, it also misses the point that digital channels enable advertisers to complete the circle by tying their work to sales.

Carling is one of few brands - thanks to the efforts of people like Nicola Young - to have got its head round how to use digital channels as an FMCG brand. It focused on specific areas like football and music and developed assets (like venues such as the Brixton Academy) to support it all. Now it's worked out how using the special skills of the iPhone - namely its tilt function - it can engage well using mobile.

But, the iPint could and should have offered, first, instant information on the nearest pub with Carling on tap using the iPhone’s Google Maps and GPS services, and, second, a voucher (via SMS/email/Bluetooth/mobile web/whatever) for, say, a free second pint.

The fact that it doesn't is probably related to factors such as budget, technical knowledge/resource, or the need to get it out in time for the launch of the iPhone apps store.

Digital always offers the ability to link any advertising to the bottom line. In many cases, it might not be the right thing to do. But you can bet that Carling’s on and off-trade distributors - and even customers - would argue that iPint was not one of them

Follow me at http://twitter.com/Philipbuxton
Blog: http://mediaquake.wordpress.com
Circus Street site: http://www.circusstreet.com

 

All Comments

  August 5, 2008

I think you have missed the point.

  August 5, 2008

It's brilliant. You don't have to commercialise every viral/game.

  August 5, 2008

Hi - yep, I think it's brilliant too. It's just not finished is my view.

  August 7, 2008

I agree, it's nicely done but it's a party piece to show off your iPhone / iTouch ... nothing more. Carling could have done more with it

  August 7, 2008

Perhaps it doesn't need to be finished - just light brand awareness is all - a nice gimmik to say - hey, have fun with our brand - to push to the nearest pub that has carling is a nice idea but i wouldn't walk an extra mile for a carling when the nearest pub is 5 meters away...

  August 7, 2008

nope. but you might if you got a free one..?

  August 15, 2008

I think it's a great piece of brand engagement. It lets the user show off their iPhone while giving them a lovely brand experience. And that's what it is - a brand piece.

I think your idea of an application that leads you to the nearest Carling pub is a lovely idea. But it is a different idea. I'm a believer in keeping things simple and don't think the two things should be lumped together into one.

Maybe if you tell Trevor Beattie about your own idea he might buy you a pint to say thank you.

  August 20, 2008

That's an idea worth some debate - can/should 'brand' work be separated from 'response' work? The common view is they should, but I'm not sure it matters. Do 'engage with my brand' and 'buy my product' really need to be separated so?

  October 16, 2008

My views on the iPint (great idea, could have gone further) prompted some to argue that the idea was

To comment on this post you have to be logged in

Search Community

 

About this blog

Mobile Matters
Philip Buxton, former editor of Revolution and digital media consultant, offers insights on the trends and realities of mobile for the media industry

Contributors

Philip Buxton

Blogging for:

Mobile Matters

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 13 Aug 2009

Total Posts: 47

Recent Posts

Archives

Syndication

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT