<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>September is the cruellest month?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/jeremyleeonmedia/archive/2008/08/04/september-is-the-cruellest-month.aspx</link><description>Oh dear. September looks like it&amp;#39;s going to be a stinker if you work in commercial television. With ITV&amp;#39;s interim results out on Wednesday it&amp;#39;s not surprising that ITV is being singled out as the expected biggest loser with drops in excess</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>re: September is the cruellest month?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/jeremyleeonmedia/archive/2008/08/04/september-is-the-cruellest-month.aspx#24894</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:58:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:24894</guid><dc:creator>Ed Kemp</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Forgive my ignorance, but did the RWC really make that big a difference? Prior to the tournament everyone thought England would be on the first P&amp;amp;O home, so I can't imagine brands paid an awful lot for ad spots. I know ITV ramped its prices up for the final (and semi i think) but still, it was hardly like a football world cup from that point of view.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=24894" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>