Is it so wrong to derive just a tiny bit of mirth from the plight of those people who were stupid enough to pay £30 to visit Lapland New Forest to what most right-minded people would have guessed was not going to live up to what was advertised?
In truth it probably is, but it’s been difficult not to find some humour in the stories that have emerged from the muddy field at Matchams Leisure Park in Dorset. The Sun, in particular, deserves real credit for sending one of its reporters to the camp and getting her photographed on Santa’s knee. Santa, we are told, ‘smelt like a burger van’, while the elves that herded her into his grotto (described as a ‘plywood shed)’ were ‘spotty’.
Apparently, visitors were disappointed that the attraction bears no reality to the marketing on the website: there was no ‘winter wonderland’ scene, the ‘bustling’ Christmas market was nothing of the sort, the ‘log cabins’ were sheds and the ‘tunnel of light’ was some fairy lights strung around some trees, reported the BBC.
Naturally children were upset, people were angry and refunds were demanded. But aside from showing British journalism at its best – in other words when it is being mischievous – the sorry affair does provide some useful lessons about the true meaning of Christmas; it is overpriced, people will be disappointed, it’s likely to be wet and, most crucially, Christmas advertising should be treated with a large pinch of salt.