Blogs

Jeremy Lee on Media

Comments: 2
Rating:
 

Given that the country is teetering on the brink of the worst recession for more than a decade, the decision of culture secretary, Andy Burnham, to rule-out product placement on TV is at best bizarre and at worst crass.

The media sector faces unprecedented threats to its revenue streams as advertisers pare back spend so surely instead of putting them in some sort of straight-jacket, they should be encouraged to develop additional money through innovation.

Burnham seems to think that if the UK did adopt the practice, which is still the subject of an EC consultation, marketing directors would have an undue influence on editorial integrity. Rubbish. This would be in no-ones interest and, in fact, without brand references, programming looks even phonier.

All Comments

  June 12, 2008

The most powerful argument in favour of allowing product placement is that it will level the playing field with US production companies.  It is clearly unfair that a British broadcaster can show a US-made programme, bursting with product placement (does anyone remember the blatant plugs for Virgin, including a cringe-worthy appearance by Branson on 'Friends'), whereas this source of revenue is denied to European programme makers.

Unfortunately, as long as the EU continues to describe what the Americans call 'product integration' as 'surreptitious advertising', this is unlikely to change.

  June 12, 2008

Absolutely right - it's happening already.

It also struck me last night that the supreme irony is that just a few weeks ago that Gordon Brown was trying to get himself on an Apprentice-style TV show called Junior PM. Now if that isn't crass product placement then I don't know what is.

To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT