Brand Republic
 
Edition:
UK |
Asia
 
Digital jobs

Jobs

 

Directory

 

Online ad buying 

Comments:3   Add your comment
The practice of online planning and buying is coming under intense pressure these last weeks, first with Facebook and as we reported yesterday with adult listings and the Internet Movie Database.

It seems likely that the Facebook story, relating to consumer goods firms finding their ads running alongside the fascist British National Party's page, and the same again with brands finding themselves next to adult film entries on the IMDB.com is just the tip of the iceberg.

There are, no doubt, many other examples out there of online content appearing next to suspect content.

It does not seem as if the same standards apply to online content that applies to when ads are placed online.

Clearly, it is a different landscape and sites have a lot of inventory, but really it is not that difficult to work out a checklist of content that advertisers’ ads should not run alongside: racist, sexist, offensive or adult-related material.

If these simple checks are not being done, then it asks the question: are any checks being done?

The IAB has made efforts to shore up confidence with an audit of the sales houses that have signed up to the Internet Advertising Sales House, the IAB ad network that promotes best practice.

But as Marketing reports this morning it does not go far enough, because there are sales houses that have not signed up and are therefore not being audited.

This includes the likes of Google, which has not signed up to the initiative.

The burden, however, does not lie exclusively with sales houses. Online media planners and buyers are also part of the equation and the IPA says it is exploring additional protective measures for advertisers.

UPDATE: As pointed out below, t he BBC's 'Panorama' last month exposed examples of hundreds of violent videos were appearing on various websites and how some like Pure Street Fights were carrying ads from the likes of BT, John Lewis, 02, Carphone Warehouse and Orange.

Again in that incident brands insisted that they had no knowledge that their ads were running on such sites.

The placing of those ads highlighted by 'Panorama' was blamed on "rogue ad networks" although the programme did not name and shame.

Comments

August 14, 2007 11:02 AM
 
Don't forget the recent Panorama programme exposing the UK advertisers running ads on weird fightporn (?) sites....
 
 
August 14, 2007 12:21 PM
 
Here's another angle - a media buyer is charged with reaching x volume of y consumers (they see the ad). A comms planner is charged with creating engagement with said consumers (they do something with the ad). Facebook run of site ads do one, facebook applications do the other. Which is best? Discuss.
 
 
August 16, 2007 1:40 PM
 
Think this is a symptom of the 'pile it high, sell it cheap' network deals that seem to make up the bulk of online ad buys these days. It's a great way of blowing money fast and fewer larger deals make less work for planners, but where's the relationship with chosen demographic? Whatever happened to carefully targetted buying, advertorials and more?
 
To comment on this post you have to be logged in

About this blog

Gordon's Republic

Brand Republic's daily blog on digital, media and plenty in between.
 

About the author

Gordon Macmillan

Blogging for:

Gordon's Republic

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 26 Nov 2009

Total Posts: 1,626

 
 
 
 

Tags

 

Syndication