Edition:: UK |; Asia

Jobs

Project Director
£45000-£50000
CRM Planner
£30000-£40000
Interactive Designer
£28-£30
Associate Director - Digital
£55000-£65000
Junior Account Director
Up to £40k + benefits

Gordon's Republic

Blair and Hitler

Comments:0 Add your comment

Running an ad that compares the prime minister Tony Blair to Adolf Hitler is just plain wrong.I'm not the only one as a number of people complained about the ad for NO2ID, an anti-identity card campaign group, which ran in The Guardian.

As you an see it shows a close-up of Blair's face in monochrome, with a barcode placed on his top lip to resemble the German dictator's moustache.

NO2ID said that the photograph of Tony Blair was retouched to make it look like a 1930s portrait and the layout was designed to recall the Nazi era. The campaign group argued that the photograph did not portray Tony Blair "as Hitler" but was intended to be "a comparison of Tony Blair with Hitler based on policy, not personality".

On policy? Well that's okay then.

NO2ID said that the ad contained an implicit claim that "identity cards were useful to the implementation of Nazi policies across Europe; they argued that that was beyond doubt" and asserted that identity cards themselves had "been used to control populations in occupied Europe and were very closely associated with the process of sorting victims for the concentration camps".

In its defence, NO2ID argued that free speech was a vital function of advertising and said the ad was intended to be insulting to Tony Blair.

In its defence, The Guardian said the ad did not make a serious comparison between Tony Blair and Hitler, but sought to highlight a particularly contentious policy. It said the newspaper was aimed at an adult and educated readership and, as such, it should allow a certain degree of latitude in the advertising it carried that depicted political figures.

The Advertising Standards Authority rejected the complaints after concluding the ad may be have been distasteful to some but was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence.

The ASA said: "We considered that, although the ad may have been distasteful to some, it was unlikely to be seen as making a serious comparison between Tony Blair and Hitler but instead as highlighting a lobbying group's opinion that ID cards should not be introduced because of the threat to civil liberty they posed. We concluded that, as such, the ad was unlikely to cause serious or widespread offence."

Published Nov 29 2006, 03:25 PM by Gordon Macmillan

save it on Add to Del.icio.us

Del.icio.us Add to Digg

Digg

Stumble

share on

Facebook

Comments

No Comments

To comment on this post you have to be logged in

Top of Page

Search Community

About this blog