Blogs

European football's governing body has finally lost the plot.

 

Today Brazilian/Croatian striker Eduardo has been banned for two games for 'simulation' during Arsenal's return leg against Celtic last week.

 

A can of worms has now well and truely been opened.

 

I think any true fan would agree that something needs to be done about diving, but this ban has come completely out of the blue.

 

UEFA have deemed it worthy to judge the player well after the event, and yet we're unwilling to take a second look at the sending off Manchester United's Darren Fletcher in last year's semi-final - a decision that cost the Scot a place in the final against Barcelona.

 

Arsenal's manager Arsene Wenger says he will now contest every dubious decision from here on in. And who can blame him?

 

UEFA should have used the Eduardo dive as an opportunity to reconsider the introduction of video technology. There isn't a single sport that I think of that has introduced video replays that has been the worse off for it

 

Should football prove any different they could always get rid of it. But they simply won't know until they've tried it.

 

 

All Comments

  September 2, 2009

I dont know what you are complaining about Ed. Any change in policy has to actually start somewhere and this is as good a point as any. As usual it is amazing that the manager who never sees anything, saw that this was not a penalty.

Granted using technogy is probably a better way but who wants to see Wenger arguing with a machine?

  September 2, 2009

Granted they should clamp down, but UEFA lack consistancy. If they are going to start introducing bans for diving they should make this very clear at the start of the season and they should apply the rule to all teams/players. I seriously doubt Eduardo is the only player to con a referee last week. If they review a situation in which a player gets away with cheating and then punishing him, then why will they not do the same for a player who has been incorrectly dismissed - as in the case with Fletcher. It is far too random to be called fair.

  September 2, 2009

Cheating old Deano's been dealt. Edge - Wasps

  September 3, 2009

of course players geta away with it every week, that's the point isn't it? When action is taken, and formalised so players and managers know what will happen if they 'simulate' (ridiculously coy word) then we might see a reduction in Olympic diving. And it would be about time. I'd feel the same way, possibly more so, if it was one of my own team's players who got caught out

  September 5, 2009

I agree with both Ed and Chris, I think UEFA are acknowledging the need to take action on diving and that movement in any direction by a stagnant body such as UEFA should be seen as progress if only because it can then gauge how wrong it has been in its reaction. I also agree that the nature of this intervention is bordering on insane. Yes, the player dived, but he did so in a match that ended 5-1 on aggregate. If UEFA are going to wait to act until far after the event has concluded then they should act in accordance with the impact of the transgression on the outcome of the match and this doesn't seem to have occured either.

Also, if UEFA were going to kick off this campaign maybe Steven Gerrards dive in the champions league final would have been a better place to start: www.youtube.com/watch

To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT