Blogs

The Olympic Games, regarded by many as the greatest sporting event on earth, are less than a week away. But how many of members of Team GB can you name? Five? Maybe ten tops? I blame the BBC, which has failed to adequately promote the potential stars of the Games.
 
The efforts of disgraced sprinter Dwain Chambers and those of South African double-amputee sprinter Oscar Pistorius to reach the Games would have been two obviously compelling tales (Pistorius’ progress was followed by Five, while Nike features the athlete in its timely global ad campaign).

 Neither will represent their country in Beijing, but every single athlete who has made the trip has a story to tell - whether born with a silver spoon in their mouth or fighting out of a ghetto. The BBC has wasted a massive opportunity. It has, in fairness, broadcast a series of programmes called Olympic Dreams charting the progress of Olympic hopefuls which began in July - but it is far far too little and far too late in evening to attract a decent audience. It’s all a bit feeble and the series doesn't appear to have even made it on the BBC iPlayer.
 
The Olympics is full of sports we would not ordinarily watch and few of its stars are household names - so the human drama becomes even more important. Remember British 400m runner Dereck Redmond being helped over the finish line by his father in the ’92 Olympics having pulled his hamstring? That moment summed up the spirit of the Olympics perfectly - and credit to global Olympic partner Visa for recognising that and using the footage in its 2008 ‘Go World’ TV ads. Look it up on YouTube!

The BBC will no doubt do a magnificent job of broadcasting the Olympics - it always does. But how much more compelling would the Games be if the BBC took its lead from Visa and understood that the Games have always been about far more than winning and losing.

 

All Comments

  August 4, 2008

I had this exact same conversation the other day with some mates and we struggled to name 5 Team GB athletes. We could name quite a few from other countries though. Tom Daley was the most mentioned but it seems a bit much to be putting medal hopes on the shoulders of a 14-year old lad.

  August 4, 2008

With the Olympics, the BBC  has an opportunity  to pull in viewers who do not regularly follow sports on TV.  But in order to do that, BBC and other broacasters need to tell compelling human-interest stories.

  August 4, 2008

I completely agree. I was discussing this just yesterday with my Aussie flatmates.

We were comparing Olympic Games coverage in Aus to coverage in  the UK.

I've seen stories on the young 14-year-old diver here and maybe one or two other athletes but that is it.

In Aus, the news is dominated by stories about the Olympics and athletes with the potential to win or place. Most stories focus on the swimming stars but there is also coverage of other sports, which Aus athletes are due to compete in.

The BBC needs to give Britain champions to get behind and support. The more coverage you have, the more inspired children will be to get off their bums and go and play sport -and potentially reach the Olympics in the years to come.

Lose just a few of the 20 million football stories and you'll free up some space for other sports.

Such a wasted opportunity. Not just for the BBC, but for Britains themselves.

  August 4, 2008

Sorry, probably should have said: "but for British people in general".

  August 4, 2008

'BBC wastes...'

Be fair. There's only 400+ odd of them going, and they have to have time to pack and stuff.

I am sure that, once there, should any Brit come within a glimmer of a gong, we will be heartily fed sick of the coverage.

  August 4, 2008

I'm not sure you can lay so much resposibility at the step of the BBC.

What about asking first where the BOA promotion and PR has been? Surely the resposibility is with them to promote British athletes through the British media. When there is then a significant public interest is it down to the Beeb to satisfy that. In reality the majority of Olympic events are minority sports and the BBC is a public service broadcaster.

  August 4, 2008

Yes, they are minority sports but the Games are not minority interest... so

as a public service broadcaster it is the BBC's duty to give it more exposure. If they can't be bothered then the Olympics should not be a protected sport (which it is at the moment) and let's see what Sky could do with it... The Ricky Hatton vs. Floyd Mayweather was made all the more enjoyable on Sky last year because they ran a brilliant series of documentaries during the build up following the boxers. I'm not a huge boxing fan but having 'got to know' the boxers prior to the fight I really enjoyed it.

As for the BOA - they simply don't have the budget or reach to tells these stories... The BBC has!

  August 4, 2008

Greatest sporting event on earth? Perhaps. But I think you have a point that the BBC has a duty to do more with it especially given how many of its journalists are going on a junket. It has no excuse given the number of platforms it now broadcasts across - perhaps it could replace some of that utter rubbish comedy crap on BBC Three with more and better Olympic coverage

To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT