<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx</link><description>Just watched Amy Winehouse &amp;quot;sing&amp;quot; at the Nelson Mandela 90th birthday concert in Hyde Park. It&amp;#39;s known she&amp;#39;s in all sorts of medical trouble , on crack and all sorts. So why was she allowed on stage at what is supposed to be a celebration</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>One Year Blogging For Media Week</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#24208</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:25:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:24208</guid><dc:creator>DigiTales Blog - Mel Carson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Tomorrow is the 1st anniversary of my first post on DigiTales . In 157 posts, as the tagline says, I&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=24208" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22819</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:04:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22819</guid><dc:creator>Mackenziehead</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've never been a fan. she reminds me of that Mari &amp;quot;Beehive&amp;quot; Wilson from the early 80's. Her whole career has been a triumph of style over substance. (pure branding) disposable posture pop for north london dinner party chatter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22819" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22808</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:07:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22808</guid><dc:creator>roy marks</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;she was a very naughty ninner when she was on stage alright and singling wasn't good&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22808" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22801</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:39:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22801</guid><dc:creator>Rich Sutcliffe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;From Jocelyn: would witholding it create even more infamy and admiration from her younger followers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It probably would, yes, censorship in music has a tendenacy to do just that. But that wouldn't have prevented the organisers showing a little forethought and just not booked her for the event in the first place. It's one thing not airing a crack-addled performer after the event, but nobody would have batted an eylid had her name never been linked with the show in the first place. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22801" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22796</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:08:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22796</guid><dc:creator>Mel Carson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I read on the BBC after I posted that she played two songs and that the second one was much better and more coherent. Just thought it was interesting they aired the rambling interview and the less-lucid of the songs she performed....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22796" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22795</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:01:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22795</guid><dc:creator>Jocelyn Kirby</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I agree with G Shepherd. It was pretty sad to see her in the state she so obviously is in. She's a shadow of her former self and it is a shame to see her talent spoiled by the darker side of fame. I'm not sure that ITV had a choice but to show her performance though - would witholding it create even more infamy and admiration from her younger followers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22795" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22780</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:27:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22780</guid><dc:creator>Mel Carson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Even the BBC said her performance was strong! Who decides how they treat a phenomenon like her? Is it all about ratings?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22780" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Is ITV Responsible For Amy Winehouse?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/digitales/archive/2008/06/27/is-itv-responsible-for-amy-winehouse.aspx#22779</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 08:18:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:22779</guid><dc:creator>Mackenziehead</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely agree that her &amp;quot;performances&amp;quot; at Mandela and Glasto were shocking. Like a bad pub karaoke. And yet the media and fans rave about her. She is proof of the power of brand marketing, even when the product is so poor, if the brand / myth is built well enough. But for how long?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=22779" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>