DigiTales Blog - Mel Carson

Microsoft Advertising's Mel Carson collects stories and insight from the digital media space and brings them back down to earth...

The program entitled – Children’s Fight Club – exposed the practise of videoing assaults, playground fights and criminal damage being committed and then uploading it to online video sites. The high-profile YouTube came in for a particular drubbing, however.....

......so did a couple of smaller “niche” sites such as Live Leak and Pure Street Fights.

Leaving aside the obvious issues surrounding the idiots who initiate and film this type of crap, two questions for the digital industry sprung to mind:

How should generalist sites like YouTube and MSN Soapbox ensure their content is not of this kind of gratuitously violent and criminal nature? And how can we protect advertisers from appearing alongside such videos which could potentially damage their brand?

I believe media owners have a responsibility and a duty of care to at least be seen to be proactively doing something about it.

The Google spokesperson said that “the community” will judge the content and flag anything inappropriate, but that’s not going to happen!

The people searching for this stuff are just the sickos who want to view it. They’re hardly going to flag it for removal if it’s exactly what they’re looking for.

The types of viewer that enjoy videos of rabbits doing back flips are simply not going to be searching for “happy slappers”. Although last night may now have given rise to a few video vigilantes hell bent on flagging inappropriate content which wouldn’t be such a bad thing.

Technology should do the trick - as with search engine listings, keywords in the titles and descriptions could trigger alerts for analysts to take a look and judge whether the video is appropriate and take action. But it will take a little thought and investment....

This’ll then benefit the advertiser too, as will better, more contextual and intuitive algorithms ensure they have better control over where they’re ads are shown.

We’ve already seen the reaction to recent stories of blind networks having distribution deals with less than desirable sites. Action is being taken...

It has to be said that these cases are the minority that are spoiling the party, but with advances in technology and a little common sense it’s not something that’ll be too difficult to fix.

How stupid is it to film yourself kicking in a police car and exposing it to millions anyway?

Published Jul 31 2007, 01:42 PM by Mel Carson
Filed under:
 

All Comments

  July 31, 2007
i watched the programme. i did a search after to be honest. to see how accessible the stuff is and found a video put on by some liverpool gang. pictures of their bikes, dogs and then guns! and followed by a still of each of the gang and their name to show off! not the cleverest thing ive seen. disgusting though, surely in such a big company as youtube there should be a department that seeks this crap out and deletes it and blocks people who put it up!
  August 1, 2007
You're right, neither the user nor the police are going to monitor inappropriate material on a large enough scale to fully control the situation. It all comes back to the age old media argument of what is/isn't inappropriate and whether media genuinely affects its users. While watching a video like this won't suddenly send most people out to start fights, if it's encouraging the people that would to then do it more and brag about it online, then this material is affecting the end user detrimentally.
To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT