http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/dandouglassondirect/archive/2009/05/26/do-you-take-sugar-with-your-copy.aspxLast week, &#39;Campaign&#39; devoted its &#39;Close Up&#39; section and editorial to the demise of copy. It started by mourning long copy and then went on to toll the bell for &#39;all copy&#39;. This on the basis of awards - or lack of them. There wereenCommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/dandouglassondirect/archive/2009/05/26/do-you-take-sugar-with-your-copy.aspx#45341Wed, 27 May 2009 09:18:00 GMT0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:45341Mark Griffiths<p>There's one big problem. You guys call it 'copy'. You entrench the lack of consideration and respect. A word can point a thousand pictures.</p> <img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=45341" width="1" height="1">http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/dandouglassondirect/archive/2009/05/26/do-you-take-sugar-with-your-copy.aspx#45289Tue, 26 May 2009 12:44:22 GMT0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:45289Noelle McElhatton<p>Lincoln's address was so quick, so unexpectedly short, that the assembled reporters had bearly taken their pencils out by the time it was over. Many of them missed it. Isn't that the issue with short copy?</p> <img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=45289" width="1" height="1">