<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.brandrepublic.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Back to school for AKQA’s directors?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/bobwillott/archive/2009/06/18/back-to-school-for-akqa-s-directors.aspx</link><description>Now here&amp;#39;s a conundrum, or two conundrums actually. AKQA&amp;#39;s UK accounts, just published, show a big drop in post-tax profits from £1.5 million in 2007 to £281,227 in 2008, but this is attributed to some non-recurring salary costs arising from the</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 SP2 (Debug Build: 20611.960)</generator><item><title>re: Back to school for AKQA’s directors?</title><link>http://community.brandrepublic.com/blogs/bobwillott/archive/2009/06/18/back-to-school-for-akqa-s-directors.aspx#47142</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:05:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0f8ed6bf-041d-4f2c-bb76-9560b958a575:47142</guid><dc:creator>Will Rowe</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;It's not the first year though, is it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://community.brandrepublic.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=47142" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>