Bloggerati

Like most blokes I enjoy a good shave in the morning but I was suprised to see poster-sized ads for Gillette Fusion plastered over broadsheet sports supplements this week.

First of all, on a personal level, it annoyed me. I enjoy reading sport and these ads were screaming for attention. But they were just not relevant to my mood or what I was doing.

 Some years ago, I was involved in a blog seeding campaign for Gillette Fusion with Shiny Media (www.shinymedia.com). Disclosure: I'm a shareholder in Shiny Media. I thought the idea behind that campaign was smart: look to participate in conversations with bloggers where relevant. Maybe Gillette fusion is running a blogging outreach programme to support these latest ads.

However the poster-sized ads in the sports sections seemed from a different advertising age to me.

www.itsopen.co.uk

There's been a lot of talk about whether or not Twitter should take advertising lately.

But you can advertise on Twitter. Check out betweeted.com or www.monitter.com. These are popular, some would say, iconic, Twitter applications that take ads. Here's another: featuredusers.com.

I reckon these mark the start of a new type of advertising. It's niche and relevant. It's not mass. It's about a mass of niches.

Any views?

www.itsopen.co.uk

 

Digg is launching, if you have not already heard, a user- driven ads system. This is how it works: if the readers of the site love your ad: you pay less; if they hate it, you pay more. Imagine if that was applied across the board to advertising!! Advertising now has to created in collaboration with the customer or it has to be bang on the money and be really relevant otherwise it is going nowhere.

 Read more here:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/06/03/told-you-digg-for-ads-coming

So what's the future for advertising: my opinion, for what it is worth, is that it will be niche, niche, niche and more niche. Mass advertising is dying on its feet. Who watches TV ads when you can skip them? Who bothers with one- size- fits all  ads in print to ink newspapers which are not sustainable in the long term?

 Any comments?

Jeff Jarvis has come up with an interesting idea about advertising. He argues that ideally there should be no need to advertise as people should love the product so much they rave about it to their peers and thus promote sales. Advertising, he suggests, points out that the direct relationship has broken down somehow.

http://www.buzzmachine.com/2009/05/30/advertising-as-failure/

I think there is an element of truth in what Jarvis is saying particularly in an online context. Some companies seem to have already given up on entering into conversations with their customers online. They just allow complaints to carry on without saying anything. They feel they cannot change anything. Why are they so pessimistic? So instead they resort to ads to try to blast the message out that everything is alright really but if it is in effect just brash make- up on a pig then it ain't going to work. And people will continue to trash the company's reputation online. Motto of the story is listen to what your customers are saying online, involve them in your products, take their criticisms on board, collaborate with them and then you are more likely to be successful. Your customers will do the advertising for you by word of mouth.

www.itsopen.co.uk

Social media spreads..... People create their own content. As people co-create brands by editing youtube videos of ads and taking photos on flickr of products they are supplanting traditional brand advertising. Glossy brand messages - one size fits all- do not work well in a social media context. If you were at a party you wouldn't want to be interupted by someone shouting about a product which you did not care about, would you? The internet now is about niches. Niches of interest. Advertising has to get smaller to get bigger. Think niche. The trouble is that many ad agencies are not in a position to think niche. Big sweeping, centralized brand plans and campaigns are relatively easy to carry out. Big money, big messages, and in theory big reach. But they are not working. I saw a music festival recently which is accepting no sponsors. Brands are banned. Brand advertisers should take heed. A social media generation is here which demands more sensitivity. Your ads better be useful and relevant to them wherever they are online otherwise their will be a backlash.

www.itsopen.co.uk

Press barons and journalists trapped in traditional editorial mindsets cannot accept that their content should be free. They have failed to recognise that news is now a commodity. Google has made more or less everything a commodity. Everything is searchable. Content is everywhere. Newspapers who fight to charge for their content are going the way of the dinosaurs. It is time to open up. Drop the charges. Enable your columnists to enter into broader and wider conversations with audiences. Develop communities of interest around your content. Invite people in. Be interesting and you will gain influence for your content as it is shared around more easily and you will get more clicks on your ads because more people can get in.

 www.itsopen.co.uk

With the Evening Standard promising to be different, it is interesting to read the debates taking place on BuzzMachine (www.buzzmachine.com) about the future of newspapers.

Here is the key message: In the old way of thinking, the newspaper was a product. In the new way, news organisations provide a service. In the old way of thinking readers sat still to observe a performance.Now readers are participatory. In the old way of thinking newspapers marketed themselves to a population. In the new way, they converse, engage and collaborate with the communities they serve. The population markets the news organisation among itself. In the old way of thinking, editors were in charge, choosing which stories to provide to readers based on what they thought the readers wanted to know. In the new way, readers are in charge. They read what they want, when they want.

 If the Evening Standard really wants to be relevant to London, then Buzzmachine would suggest it puts these principles into action.

 

 

Lots of US companies are launching intern social media initiatives. See this one below from Anway, where they have invited interns to create videos about working with the company.

It looks like the digital immigrants are starting to hand the show over to the natives. At the moment those natives are on the fringes, what happens when they get their hands on the controls of the company?

 

http://interns.opportunityzone.com/2009/03/20/Interns-Expose-Amway.aspx

www.itsopen.co.uk

Tweeting is spreading across all media platforms now. ITV recently carried out an experiment allowing Twitterers to talk through a programme.

For more details see:

http://wearesocial.net/blog/2009/03/watch-tweet-live/

CNN has integrated facebook into TV coverage and now TV manufacturers are starting to add social media functions ie YouTube access to TV sets.

 Who said social media was a fad?!

It is interesting to see how the media feeds off itself ie newspaper articles are often based on forthcoming TV programmes and the radio spends a lot of time reviewing the newspapers.

What matters here for marketeers/advertisers etc is the content. Social media offers new platforms for distributing content. So how are you going to use them?

For TV companies social media is an opportunity to distribute its content through Twitter and You Tube. Susan Boyle has hit the big time on youtube so how will that impact on the show's ratings and how will ITV capitalise on that relationship with the viewers who are watching Susan Boyle only on You Tube.

It's time for new thinking and new approaches. Old media thinking is dead. It is time for experimentation. The brands that prosper now are going to be doing things a lot differently.

www.itsopen.co.uk

There's a very interesting piece in this week's Economist about consumer psychology and brands. As trust in brands suffers, The Economist argues that recommendations from  friends  will become more powerful. Cue the importance of social media.

http://www.economist.com/business/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13415207

The magazine argues: ‘As trust in brands is eroded, people will place more value on recommendations from friends. Social media make it harder for brands to pull the wool over consumers’ eyes, but they also offer canny companies a powerful new channel through which to promote their wares and test new products and pricing strategies.’

There are relatively few companies who are embracing social media in a strategic way. There are exceptions of course: the canny companies are getting involved already. Usually it's down to a few visionaries in the business who are comfortable with technology or can see the potential shifts in communications models that is taking place. And smart CEOs are starting to catch onto this area which tends to quickly galvanise a business into action.

However there are plenty of businesses who simply don't get it and will not do so for years. Many companies don't have budgets for social media as it is so new. But expect that to change.  If you want to stay in touch with key audiences, social media is the most important game in town.

My advice to brands is to start small and experiment. Identify the social media networks that surround and impact your brand and begin to engage with them. Afterall it would be rude, would it not, to simply ignore your customers who are talking about you now! Any brand must be careful to respect the etiquette of social media networks and blogs.

Here are some simple guidelines to begin with: Do your research; read what blogs and social media networks in your sector are saying; follow the threads of conversation; post comments when you have something interesting to say to the audience. Something that is relevant. Never hide who you are. Don't try to overtly sell a service or product. Link to interesting pieces you have read. Treat people with respect. Don't be frightened to correct mistakes and remember people are more polite when they know there is someone listening!

One of my favourite examples of a brand engaging with social media is Innocent. They have cleverly integrated a range of social media platforms in a model which works  well across different regions of the world. They are using social media to deepen relationships with consumers. Which is something that Coke, their new investors,  might be keen to learn from them.

One other point for brands: there is sometimes an emphasis on short term campaigns. Which to an extent is fair enough but social media should, I think, be approached on a long term basis with a clear strategy for a brand which involves collaborating with consumers and listening to consumers and participating with them in new ways. Brand teams need to have clear guidelines and to be familiar with the technologies and applications that are available. There are so many and the possibilities for creativity are immense. I even heard today of a company doing wine tastings via Twitter. You get your wine and learn about the wine from the expert who tweets with you. It sounds bizarre but then again who would have said the FT's Lex column would be using Twitter six months ago?!

www.itsopen.co.uk

 

 

 

Shell has launched a climate change blog with the aim of entering into personal conversations with its key online audiences. Written by its climate change advisor, David Hone, the blog is focusing onthe practical aspects of tackling climate change. (http://blogs.shell.com/climatechange/) As well as his work for Shell, David Hone is a board member and Vice Chairman of the International Emissions Trading Association (IETA). He works closely with the World Business Council for Sustainable Developmentand has been a lead contributor to many of its recent energy and climatechange publications. Shell is a client of ItsOpen (www.itsopen.co.uk) which I work for, and we are advising the media team on how to  develop the blog with social computing consultancy Headshift (www.headshift.com).

 

It's very early days for the blog but it is an example of a large organisation using social media to enter into challenging conversations. I'd be interested to know what people think about the blog and the approach being taken...

 

 

 

Jeff Jarvis, owner of the famous blog, buzzmachine,has brought out a book called 'What would Google do?' I highly recommend it for anyone who wants to understand how the models of communications are changing.

 I saw him talking about his book on a video (search you tube - he's everywhere) and he talked about customers being your advertising agency now.Which I thought was an interesting idea.

 The fact is that customers are editing your TV commercials online already. So the purpose is to create content which they want to distribute and talk about. And to involve them more in the advertising process. I'm surprised more companies don't have a look at how they are represented on youtube because they could pick up some interesting ideas for the next campaigns...

 www.itsopen.co.uk

The Today programme has put up its own YouTube video about life behind the scenes of the programme. It was plugged this morning on the airwaves and has received very mixed comments. With some viewers saying it is lame and like an amateur dramatics performance.

I found it mildly amusing. But it's a wasted opportunity. Of course it is a bit of fun and they probably enjoyed making it. And who can blame them, they have to be so serious most of the time! But I imagine that listeners would be much more interested in seeing meetings where the production team decides how and what makes the running order. I think it would have been far better to have informal chats with producers and editors about what they are working on and the issues etc. II would have liked more of a Microsoft Channel 9 approach. Use youtube to be more open about how Today is made. There are opportunities for more meaningful interactions with the audience. The Beeb goes on about it's your BBC. Well why not give listeners a chance to engage with editors and producers and presenters through youtube directly.

What do you think?

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hVeSPyAp8aU

www.itsopen.co.uk

Skittles (www.skittles.com) is involved in some inspiring online marketing at the moment. They have been regularly dumping their website's home page and opening up to social media platforms. First their web site home page became a gateway to all the conversations about Skittles on Twitter; then the site linked up to their Facebook page and just recently it has linked to its wikipedia entry. This is bold stuff especially as it is showcasing activities which are unedited. The Twitter conversations contained swearing about Skittles when that version of the home page was running live.Some social media commentators have dismissed the work of Skittles as a shallow PR stunt designed to generate online buzz. I see their point. But it has got people really talking about Skittles and they are allowing their customers to do the talking. A lot of brand marketeers are realising that with the rise of social media they cannot hope to totally control their brands in a traditional sense. In this instance, Skittles has boldly given up control. It shows a confidence in themselves, their product and their customers. It also shows a clear recognition of the shift of power to consumers who are being emboldened and empowered by easily accessible and open social media technologies.Take a look and see what they are showcasing now. I like it because it underlines how current web site designs lack the dynamism and spontaneity of social media. I also like it because Skittles is making a connection with all of its customers who are using social media. Many companies are in denial about how their audiences are using social media or they can't see because of medieval firewall policies which will prevent digital natives from ever wanting to join their companies in the future.This is a smart marking move and full credit to Skittles. However for the business to take this further they need to have meaningful conversations with Skittles customers who are using social media and involve them in the development of their products going forward.

It is worth noting as well that Skittles is not the first brand to dabble in these kinds of tactics. Zappos has long had a twitter channel at twitter.zappos.com that shows tweets mentioning Zappos as well as the tweets of Zappos employees.

Brand marketers who read this and wonder how on earth they can manage their brands should start to monitor conversations about their brands and begin to join in conversations. Taking into account the etiquette of particular communities. They should also look for opportunities to use social media tools to invite comment and feedback from their customers. The longer they hesitate the more of a headstart bolder brands like Skittles have.

(www.itsopen.co.uk)    

 

Martin Thomas has got in touch through this blog and seems to have an interesting book on crowd surfing. Just had a chat with him and he has the unenviable challenge of spreading the word of social media through large corporates. Something I have a great deal of experience of too. It can be demoralising and it can be inspiring depending on who you meet.

 Martin writes: 

 'Crowd Surfing looks at consumer empowerment from the perspective of the
corporation. How do companies cope when consumers start playing around
with their brands - making their own versions of ads, posting not
particularly flattering photographs on Flickr - or using social media to
mobilise protests? From a different perspective, how have some companies
managed to successfully harness consumer empowerment, using the crowd to
develop products, fine tune their communication or solve problems? We
have described these successful companies (and their leaders) as Crowd
Surfers.'

There is also a blog of the book www.crowdsurfing.net <http://www.crowdsurfing.net/>
if you are interested in the topic. Looks like it tackles some relevant themes.

Maybe someone would like to share a review with us? I haven't read it yet.

www.itsopen.co.uk


 

Page 1 of 12 (174 items)
1 2 3 4 5  Next  ... 

Search Community

 

About this blog

Bloggerati
A blog about blogging - including advertising on blogs, corporate blogs and the rise of social media

Contributors

Justin Hunt

Blogging for:

Bloggerati

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 26 Jun 2009

Total Posts: 210

Recent Posts

Archives

Popular Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Syndication

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT