Bloggerati

A blog about blogging - including advertising on blogs, corporate blogs and the rise of social media

I am beginning to wonder if online brand advertising ever works...I know this is probably a heretical thing to say to Media Week readers. But I think it would be good to open up a debate.I spoke to someone about advertising on facebook for example and they said they never look at the ads. They are too busy doing other things. chatting with their friends etc. Occasionally I notice brand adverts but they are outside of where I am. Or they are just irrelevant. They are not in the conversations. They don't relate to me. They are not a natural part of the blogs etc. I'm wondering if they really work at all. People might think they do. But surely Google ad words is now the most effective way of advertising. There is hardly any branding there.  Does brand really matter online? Does it carry any really weight? I think the key medium online is the people. That is the key medium and companies need to be communicating with people ie their customers, honestly and authentically. Otherwise they will not get anywhere. I think it is so hard for big companies to do this because on the one side they have PR agencies determined to uphold their 'messages' and on the other hand they have ad agencies demanding bigger brand messages. It's very niche online.  Can ad agencies and PR agencies relate to more open conversations with key audiences and provide messages that are highly targetted and highly relevant.

For example take hotel advertising. Who books a holiday now without checking what real people have said first on Trip Adviso? If the reviews of a particular hotel are rubbish, no amount of brand advertising is going to work and no amount of brand advertising is going to change my mind and no amount of PR messages is going to convince me. It has to be different. Someone from the offending hotel itself has to read what has been said. Do something about it and talk honestly to the people about the changes they have made to their hotel etc and demonstrate they are listening. And no agency can actually do that if it is to be meaningful. Either companies ditch agencies altogether and start afresh or agencies need to radically reinvent themselves to remain relevant online.

www.itsopen.co.uk

 

All Comments

  February 23, 2009

Only thing about online reviews is that - personally - i dont trust them. Too open to rival hotelsgiving bad reviews or staff/family/friends of said hotel giving glowing testimonial. I am convinced online review sites are riddled to the core with biased reviews. Interesting development are "gold star reviewers" (or whatever they are called on ebay etc)

Being able to pen (type) florid accounts of the quality of your hotel/dishwasher/moped (or person who sold you said item) and being able to share it with others and develop an online reputation for unbiased good quality reviews is what we want. So the future is highly informed, small pool of experts giving well written accounts of their views and experiences and not the stultifyingly ill informed masses giving us the benefit of their biased and low qualitypiffle... hmmm not exactly a new idea is it?

  February 24, 2009

Dan,

Have a look at this http://www.ideastorm.com/

Dell is basing its business on sourcing reviews from people. It's not all biased. They  appear to have been getting some very well-informed views from the masses.

  February 25, 2009

i agree with you - this looks good (although Id be interested to know how they promoted this - was it just a US thing?) I suppose however that technical products are always going to maybe achieve more in online ideas forums as that is the nature of their audience? I dont know many regular folk that would post an ideas such as "Coreboot formally LinuxBIOs instead of Proprietory BIOS"

Might be me being thick but it seemed a very technical forum rather than consumer? I didnt understand a lot of the stuff on there (although i did like the idea of a backlight for keyboards) Impressive if this is all genuine as they look as though theyve got around 3000 odd responses with no immediately obvious incentive to post - unless Ive missed something

However, I was talking more about "mass" market product/service/opinion forums.

  February 25, 2009

Dan, it is not just technical companies who are crowd sourcing. Take a look at this

mystarbucksidea.force.com/ideaHome

What do you think?

  February 27, 2009

Still finding it a bit tough to relate to posts such as "Whats your favourite Loose leaf tea?" and "A note on Soy Milk."

Again, i cant fault you for the number of replies theyve got (although much of the patter seems to be from the employees)

I suppose ultimately the test of this is what the brand gets out of it (tangiable results and ideas being implemented and the positive feeling from customers) divided by the cost of doing this. ROI. has this been measured do you know..? (hopefully independently rather than yet another tactically worded questionnaire designed to influence the marketing dept to carry it on.

Dont mean to sound totally like a 'nay-sayer' i think it is important to keep a dialogue with your customers - both active and non.

Although in fact Ive been a little swayed from my original point about reviews. It is reviews rather than customer dialogue which i think is the foggiest issue...

To comment on this post you have to be logged in

Search Community

 

About this blog

Bloggerati
A blog about blogging - including advertising on blogs, corporate blogs and the rise of social media

Contributors

Justin Hunt

Blogging for:

Bloggerati

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 24 Nov 2009

Total Posts: 224

Recent Posts

Archives

Popular Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Syndication

 
 

ADVERTISEMENT