Blogs

Everyone's bashing the Royal Mail and CWU. The Royal Mail are being criticised for poor management, arrogance and for failing to adapt quickly enough to the realities of the digital age. CWU are being criticised for much the same thing with Billy Hayes pilloried as a modern day Arthur Scargill (Wiki him if you're under 30),

There may be truth in both accusations. But I'm not going to explore the merits of the dispute.

What I really don't like is the sneering tone of affluent urban classes - "we don't really need the post these days, do we? I do everything on my Blackberry..." the sub text being "do we really have to subsidise the post for Ethel Miggins living in a rural Cumbria?" (Yes, you do).

It's the same unpleasant sneer that's you can see in the latest Dixons.co.uk campaign where they have a pop at John Lewis' middle England values. You always used to experience it when buying a hi-fi or computer - "You want what?...you ARE joking aren't you...?". And I sense other brands are adopting an approach of "you must be stupid/out of touch if you don't use our brand" for their advertising.

The mail service provides a lifeline for many communities and for older people. My mum would be lost without it. Direct mail still delivers high quality customers and donors for many brands. I was also reassured that my surgeon chose to communicate complex, life or death medical information to my consultant in a considered letter, rather than dashing off a quick email (with the inevitable typos). And I want my internet purchases to be delivered without an extra £7.50 charge for courier delivery.

It may well be that a strike is one of the last throes of a dying industry, but we would all be poorer without it.  I do hope the sneer does not become the tonal template for Cameron's Britain. It's all too reminiscent of the unpleasant 80s when we knew the price of everything and the value of nothing. Ok ya?

All Comments

  October 20, 2009

Agreed. We are guilty of taking the Royal Mail very for granted. When I think back to the origins of the postal service, we have a lot to be thankful for. And I'm sure even the sneeriest of Crackberry users  is not immune to the thump of newly delivered birthday cards on the doormat. The ping of a new email just doesn't compare.

  October 20, 2009

Absolutely right Chris. Most people I know don't take Royal Mail for granted at all. We all use it regularly, and appreciate the effort put into a hand-written note or card, and on-line purchase deliveries. I'm lucky enough to know my postman by name, and we often have a chat. He even takes my outgoing mail. Life would be the poorer without him.

  October 20, 2009

I agree with you on the Royal Mail, well said. But I love the Dixons campaign. Sneering at lazy, non-essential companies such as John Lewis and Selfridges is fine by me.

  October 26, 2009

I agree - with an abhorance of the arrogant sneer.

It is a game though - a formulaic bad mouthing media manipulation of stories of tiresome spin doctor rhetoric.

Sensation sells - I assume is the what leads media to lose touch with people feel on the street.

More accountancy led closed systematic thinking crushes societal values, small businesses and those in need of local service.

Ho hum - it's the shareholder capitalist age still.

the way Royal Mail has been managed has diminished its value as a service - and now the guys doing the service get the blame?

Same old story

  October 28, 2009

So on the basis that your mum would be lost without it, we should prop up an organisation that has continually failed its customers over the last ten years, where poor management is endemic and financial performance desultory - in what was, for decades, a monopoly. Perhaps you'd advocate a nationwide return to Betamax too, just to accommodate those poor folk unfortunate enough to invest in the format. I would have found your comments about the Dixons campaign laughable were it not for the slightly sinister 'middle-class fundamentalism' that infused them. Can you not appreciate the irony when casting your spiteful judgements on the 'sneering tone of the affluent urban classes'? Presumably that's a swipe at people with more money than you but, in your estimation, less taste?  And coming from a man who drives a Volvo Estate.

To comment on this post you have to be logged in
 

ADVERTISEMENT