Brand Republic
 
Edition:
UK |
Asia
 
Digital jobs

Jobs

 

Directory

 

Is art better than advertising?  

Comments:3   Add your comment
Rape, HIV and abuse of women are serious subjects. But ActionAid rather than try and shock us (unlike the Banardo’s approach) has found a very engaging way to raise awareness. Not through advertising but art. 2876 women around the world contract HIV every day.

A girl in South Africa has a higher chance of being raped than of learning to read. Violence and rape against girls are a major factor in these women getting AIDS. 15 million women are already infected with the virus. The PUT YOUR FOOT DOWN campaign has been designed to put a stop to this alarming fact.

So was the solution a shocking press ad? A distressing viral? Or a shock horror TV commercial? No, they turned to YCN and discovered Finish artist Ritta Ikonen. Ritta is an amazing artist and mind. I’ve known her for a number of years since she worked with us in one ad agency. Everyday she’d come in with a different name badge on. She carried a small box with micro models of figures in. Her work – a figure on an eyelash – was one featured on a series of Beck’s art themed bottles.

I think she found the way we work rather odd. What is interesting working with people who don’t have the same background as most of us in advertising is they think different and think we all think the same. They probably have a point. I have an interesting mix of creatives in my department at the moment, a fashion designer, architect, product designer, illustrator and a film maker.

Give them an ad brief and the outcome is challenging in the sense they challenge us. Personally I think all agency creative departments (we have over 20 people) should employ 20% non ad people. Just over a year ago I went to an exhibition at the RCA based around environmentalism. Ritta’s piece, The Last Snowflake, was a very thought provoking piece.

Born out of the thought that one day, thanks to global warming, there’ll be no more snow. Many other pieces by other artists stimulated debate and discussion. What really made us think was the power of the art to communicate, far better than the formulaic ad method (picture and pun) we often adopt. We discussed the concept of ‘ideas’, a term used in the ad industry. “What’s the idea in any great art?” was one comment. “Art emotionally engages people, that’s why it works. Surely good ads emotionally engage people. The ‘idea’ is just an attempt to rationalise it.”

You have to agree. This should lead us to question if now is the time to review our communications methods? Have we become too formulaic? The oddest brief I’ve recently been set was to redesign/decorate a piano for Boris Johnson’s London summer festival (for Sing London). After many hours of work our creatives produced the Soho themed piano – covered in black PVC and with a silver zipper made from piano hammers.

It’s sexy and looks amazing and already it’s getting publicity. People love art. They like things that are different, imaginative and engaging. How many ads do that these days? ActionAid embracing art and Rtitta is a brave move but then they are one of the few charities that take risks and aren’t afraid to explore new ideas. Good on them. Thousands of people, besides signing the petition, sent Action Aid a real shoe.

Ritta then used the shoes to capture the essence of the campaign and create a talking point. Each one displayed as part of a big installation told an individual’s story. Given that social networking is such a buzz word at the moment this campaign delivers against it big time. To see a charity use art to convey a serious message is different. Sure we’ve seen art projects before but not for serious messages that result in serious change.

Comments

June 23, 2009 8:58 AM
 

If you want to see the sexy Soho Piano go to This Is Jack blog and scroll down to 'customised piano'.

thisisjack.wordpress.com

.

 
 
June 24, 2009 10:53 AM
 

Inspiring stuff Chris, thank you. Perhaps all art is not quite useless.

Perhaps it can make us think. And act.

 
 
June 30, 2009 10:07 AM
 

Art will always be better than advertising because it has no brand to please.

It doesn't even have to please its viewer. It may even make us feel extremely uncomfortable, and that's great art. Damien Hirst's For the love of God. I hated it. I still do. Not for what it is, but for what it means, whereas Shark in Formaldehyde I love, and still do. Both are great works of art for different reasons. Banksy is the one I love most of all. Some of his work in London still goes unnoticed on the walls of London. He doesn't care. for him, art is for the people.

One artist in particular caught my attention at the D&AD Student showyesterday. Neil Hanlon from Derby University. Bold confident brush strokes with strange grotesque figures. You can feel the passion. Other than Nike, and other sports brands, when do you feel the passion ignite when you see a logo at the end of an ad/ Normally it's a let-down. Only the passionate truly hit the heights, because they

give part of themselves to the idea, and go beyond reason.

Those of us old enough to remember the Silk Cut Slash when it first came out remember what massive impact it had. It didn't need any words. The Slash was the brand. The Government health warning gave us an easy clue to the product category job for us all. It worked on so many levels.

If you were anti-smoking, the message was clear.

If you was a Silk Cut smoker, the message was clear.

If you couldn't care less, the message was clear.

Each message was different.

Each was clear.

Art has no message other than our own free interpretation:

www.youtube.com/watch

 
To comment on this post you have to be logged in

About this blog

Arnold on ethical marketing

Ethics is the fastest growing area of marketing. From green campaigns to greenwash. It's hot. It's complicated. And most companies get it wrong.
 

About the author

CHRIS ARNOLD

Blogging for:

Arnold on ethical marketing

Member since: 03 Jun 2008

Last login: 04 Nov 2009

Total Posts: 310

 
 
 
 

Tags

 

Syndication